Biden, Swine Flu and the Economy

April 30, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)

Let's says the Biden Scenario is acccurate. Let's say we should be avoiding public places because of the swine flu. What is the economic impact of a pandemic that requires such measures? IHS Global Insight has run the numbers on Captain Trips:

Scenario One. "In an epidemic (roughly 75 million infected in the United States and 100,000 fatalities), the supply and demand effects cut less than 0.5% off the growth rate of real GDP and last less than a year.  The impact in emerging markets would likely be two to three times as big."

Scenario Two: "In a more serious epidemic – or pandemic – with fatalities four to five times higher, the impact on real GDP growth in developed economies would be more like -2% to -3%.  In the case of the United States, this could mean a growth rate of -4% to -5% in 2009 and an even bigger rise in the unemployment rate. For poorer countries, which are less able to cope with such an outbreak, the impact would be devastating, and produce downturns of depression-like proportions."

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Seems to be playing bad-cop to THE ONE. Keep the confusion rolling, you know.

Jimmy P ... where've you been hiding?

Bibi of MI 1:22PM April 30, 2009

Let's do our part and avoid unnecessary public places for a while---not just for ourselves, but for the sake of making the whole thing smaller.

Church, restaurants, casinos, social clubs, large meetings, whatever. They're optional, you know.

Muser of NM 12:58PM April 30, 2009

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement