An Immigration Compromise?

June 25, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (19)

The economic crisis seems to have pushed the immigration debate to the wayside--even though lifting restrictions on foreign workers could arguably be a big stimulus in itself. But that doesn't mean that some on Capitol Hill aren't still trying to bridge the gap between people who don't want any kind of "amnesty" and those who want to make legal immigration easier.

The nonprofit group the Krieble Foundation recently promoted its "Red Card Solution" to the immigration issue with an event for members of Congress and their staffers, and they also had a National Press Club event where some members of prominent free-market groups like Freedom Works.

What's the idea?

* The U.S. government authorizes private employment agencies to grant temporary non-immigrant work permits. Foreign workers apply in their own countries for the permits.

* Job applicants are matched to current, unfilled U.S. jobs; temporary, non-immigrant workers fill a specific job for a specific time and may return home when the job ends.

* Permits are in “smart card” biometric data, enabling border authorities to see that temporary workers enter legally for pre-agreed employment and return when the work ends.

* All permit holders must pass criminal background checks in their home-country databases and in U.S. databases.

It's far from a real free market for immigration. But is this a good compromise with the "no amnesty" crowd? I asked advocate of (more) free immigration and blogger Bryan Caplan of George Mason University what he thought. He said that while tying guest workers to specific jobs creates a lot of problems like potential abuse by employers, such a plan would stillI probably be "a big improvement over the status quo."

Reader Comments Read all comments (19)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS, they are breaking the law by being here, what's the issue? Why wasn't border patrol & immigratioon out there rounding up these illegals by the truck load when they were protesting in the streets??? ILLEGAL! My ancestors came over from Europe & went through all of the LEGAL PROCESSES THAT ARE IN PLACE WHICH EVERY IMMIGRANT CAN DO to becaome a citizen. Why should they just be given citizenship? HOw does that make sense? My relatives had to work for everything to come here, to pay for the boat fare, to work hard to make A LEGAL living & pay taxes, why should these a magic wand be pulled out by the government & *poof* now these ILLEGALS can have citizenship? THAT'S INSANE!!! Why are we not enforcing the laws already on place? I'm sure that there are some that will argue that they do pay taxes, ok fine on one of my dead relatives Social Security number? Or maybe a friend of yours who has visited Mexico & had her identity stolen & her life/credit ruined by it? What a bunch of garbage. There is a LEGAL process to go through to become a citizen of this great nation, I don't care what your college GPA was, you do not get special treatment.

MsFreedomIsPrecious of MI 10:16PM June 27, 2009

Our representatives assemble to find legal paths to citizenship for illegal immigrants and ignore the rights of our citizens.

The ridiculous practices in the U.S. have helped to create the cascade of illegal immigrants using every possible service in our country.

The sanctuary city of Los Angeles provides subsidized housing, food stamps, health care and schooling... all FREE. Illegal immigrants drive down wages and drive up rents.

State taxpayers pay the bill but have no representation in this system. The state representatives just pass the buck to the Federal government who does little or nothing.The citizens ask for enforcement of our immigration laws and borders, not another temporary worker program.

Nobody gives us free food, healthcare or housing. Our cities are overcrowded and we watch our taxes rise to meet the needs of illegal immigrants and the free services they receive. Even though we pay the bill, citizens are left with the problem on every corner, in every school, hospital and jail.

The Amnesty granted illegal immigrants in 1986 was a disaster, why should we consider something like that again? We need real enforcement before any other reforms can proceed. E-Verify, illegal employer enforcement and biometric ID would be a good start..... but much more is needed. Let's stop the incentives that encourage illegal immigrants to come here in the first place!

Our outrage falls on deaf ears. We have no advocates or lobbies working on our behalf. The United States loses BILLIONS of tax dollars every year giving away free services to illegal immigrants. But our representatives would rather tax the citizens, rob the schools, close the hospitals and fill the jails instead of being politically incorrect and deporting illegal immigrants.

MadMommy of CA 3:59PM June 26, 2009

Generalizations are necessary for formulating policy. Bureaucracies don't have the time to ferret out every little detail about every single individual in order to come to some policy conclusion. So they generalize. It's not a good thing or a bad thing. It's simply the way policy must be implemented.

Let's assume you are telling the truth. I agree it's a sad story. But you are still in the U.S. illegally. You still have sucked up more resources to date (in public education, in special language training, in health care, etc.) than you have given back. Now if you were allowed to stay, then perhaps you would give more back to the country which has given you so much more than you could ever possibly have gotten back home. But most illegals won't. Their kids don't become engineers. They are more likely to become gang-bangers and single teen mothers.

You write, "It would be like me telling an African-American to go back to the African tribe from which his descendants came, or any other ethnicity for that matter."

No, it wouldn't. By law, they are American citizens and you are not. And that's all the difference in the world.

Pincher Martin of CA 3:30PM June 26, 2009

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement