Pethokoukis: 'Ron Paul's Dumb Plan'

August 3, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (51)

Since I've given Ron Paul a platform to speak the merits of auditing the Fed, I think it's only fair for me to link to former Cap Com blogger Jimmy P's article on why he thinks Paul's bill could damage the economy. Here's one of the key points:

Even if the result of the Fed bill is only more aggressive congressional questioning and criticism, financial markets might well fear the bank would start taking congressional wishes into account when making policy.

“If the markets and foreign investors perceive it that way,” says economist Michael Feroli of JPMorgan, “it could immediately push up borrowing costs even if the audits are only a symbolic increasing of congressional oversight of monetary policy.”

I'm going to stay agnostic on the issue of whether or not Paul's bill is a good idea. But here's my question to opponents of the bill like Jimmy P: Almost everyone recognizes that the Fed was a major contributor to the current financial crisis, because, as Jim writes, it kept interest rates down for too long. So without taking an anti-Fed approach a la Ron Paul, how could similar Fed mistakes be prevented in the future? If Greenspan could make such big mistakes, is there anyone who could possibly be "better"?

Reader Comments Read all comments (51)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Two websites that will help people understand the workings of the Federal Reserve and why we will have to move to a new money system to salvage our Country.

How money has shaped events and governments throughout time. The History of money changers; http://www.iamthewitness.com/books/Andrew.Carrington.Hitchcock/The.History.of.the.Money.Changers.htm

The math and science showing that our current economic system has already failed and will not continue on. Crash Course by-Chris Martenson http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/08.09/crashcourse19.html

Paul Taylor of WA 6:29PM August 22, 2009

The founders anticipated a free market in money with commodity based money.The congress is supposed to define the monetary unit,not have the ability to create money out of thin air like our FED does.The FED ISN'T CONSTITUTIONAL.Some of you suffer from the fantasy that if the Fed didn't create new money when the economy grows we "wouldn't have enough money."This is a conceptualization error.The prices would adjust to the available money supply.The money(the means of exchange)serves a numeraire function.If the base money supply were 1/10th what it is now, prices and wages would drop by a tenth all else being equal.It would be a net wash.The problem with the Fed constantly debasing(they would call it a"flexible" currency)is that punish the savers.Everyone feels richer when the Fed lowers interest rates(by increaing the credit money supply artificially)but real credit can only come out oreal savings.The FED creates a bubble economy where more projects are STARTED,BUT THEY CAN ONLY EXIST(IF THARE COMPLETED AT ALL)SO LONG AS THE BUBBLE CONTINUES.tHE FED WILL DESTROY THE CURRENCY IF THEY TRY TO KEEP THE BUBBLE ECONOM Y GOING THOUGH.

JOE PEELER of FL 11:32AM August 08, 2009

Saying the Fed had "something to do" with out current depression is like saying the Japanese had a little something to do with Pearl Harbor.The Federal Reserve has a monopoly on the issuance of money and controls our credit and interest rates.The FED thinks it can replaces real savings with artificial bank credit expansion.An interest rate is a price and they manipulate it through so-called open market operations.Each dollar bill in circulation represents a good or service.When a person saves money they are relaesing resources that other people can borrow on.When there are no real savings there can be no credit.When the Fed creates credit out of thin air it is unsustainable.and a bubble economy ensues.It encourages wild speculation.More projects are started but they are bubble activities and can only be sustained by the Fed's ability to sustain the credit bubble.They can keep it going for only so long befroe they destroy the currency.The market shouls set interest rates and in that way production can coordinated acroos time and we'll rid ourselves of these bubbles.We need commodity money(gold,silver)that can't be debased by the state.

joe peeler of FL 10:21AM August 07, 2009

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement