More On Remittances

October 13, 2009 RSS Feed Print

Commenter NM says my last post "doesn't make useful sense" because I don't answer questions like:

How many dollars of imports did America buy from Mexico, including oil, to counteract the $120.4 billion they bought from us?

The answer, according to the State Department, is that Mexican exports to the U.S. amounted to $223 billion in 2007.

So yes, Americans consume more Mexican goods than Mexicans consume American goods. But in what sense does this affect my main point that remittances are good for Americans?

Mexican imports into the U.S. do not "counteract" against American exports to Mexico. It simply means that U.S. consumers have more goods to enjoy. If anyone is convinced that this trade deficit poses a problem, more immigration (and more remittances) would help narrow the deficit by pushing up Mexican incomes and allowing them to buy more of our exports.

One more fact: Merely looking at U.S. exports to Mexico doesn't fully account for how much Mexican consumers contribute to the U.S. economy.

Official calculations of exports exclude a billion-dollar industry—the goods sold directly to Mexicans who cross into the U.S. to shop at stores in border towns. These "border exports" are not exports in the strictest sense of the word, but have much of the same impact. An article by Benjamin Gochman and Rutilio Martinez of the Consulting Group of the Americas LLC explains (unfortunately, the full article does not appear to be available online, but it is from the Rocky Mountain News, Feb. 19, 2005.)

Border exports to Mexico are the goods and services that Mexicans buy in American cities located on the U.S.-Mexican border or a few miles north of this border. These exports include consumer goods, used cars, firearms, capital goods such as used agricultural machinery, and a small number of luxury cars. Outside of firearms, these purchases are perfectly legal and could be registered as exports. However, the U.S. Department of Commerce does not register these purchases as exports. Therefore, there are no official figures on the magnitude of these exports. However, in 1998, the U.S.- Mexico Chamber of Commerce estimated American border exports at $20 billion dollars (U.S.-Mexico Chamber of Commerce, 1998).

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Let's hear about the subsidies that illegal immigrants receive via US taxpayer-funded social services, a big factor in why they can afford to send huge amounts of money out of our economy (we would have huge amounts of money to save too, if we got "free" healthcare, "free" school meals and the like). Let's hear about the thousands of Americans who have lost the equity in their homes -- their single largest family financial asset -- because illegals moved in next door and stuffed a single family home with 25 people -- a factor which also allows them to send huge amounts of money home. You're not even barely scratching the surface of the remittance issue and the negative impact it has on Americans.

MaryJ of CA 10:15AM October 14, 2009

If we want to argue that "remittances" by Mexican immigrants to their families back home are good for America, it's got to be true that SOME of the money sent there gets spent here---via both our exports and cross-border shopping. But, we could also argue that ALL of the money paid to American workers (as opposed to immigrants working here illegally) gets spent here.

On a broader moral plane, we could say that Mexican workers actually produce more value in the American economy than we pay them---since they tend to work cheaper---and therefore "deserve" every cent (except for the illegality of being here). We could say there is something right about helping a neighbor nation that suffers more poverty as a whole than we do.

I would also express fears that American corporations may be reaping the benefit of the cheaper labor to the exclusion of American workers, and that in a purely economic sense, most of the remittances sent out never return. There may be some good things about the whole of immigration, but I can't believe the case that sending lots of money out of the country right now is one of them----not with our unemployment situation here.

Muser of NM 4:26PM October 13, 2009

Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement