Comcast Caps Will Stifle Internet Video

August 29, 2008 RSS Feed Print

Having announced it will cap monthly Internet downloads, Comcast is reassuring its broadband customers that few of them will be affected. Fewer than 1 percent now exceed the monthly cap of 250 gigabytes, the company says.

It does look hard to reach the cap, according to Comcast's estimates. It involves millions or at least tens of thousands of the E-mails, songs, and photos that most all of us download every day.

Wait. What about the next great thing—movies across the Internet? Comcast's estimates drop to earth with a thud. Comcast says the cap would allow 125 standard-definition movies a month, or about 250 hours of programming.

That initially sounds like a lot. But look closely. A family of four can regularly have three TVs going. Each TV could only watch three hours of video a day. In America these days, that's not a lot.

Then throw high-definition fare into the mix. Comcast doesn't say, but it could mean between 40 and 120 hours of high-def video, depending on compression and how good the "high definition" is. Let's say 80 or 100 hours for the sake of argument, and quality.

A family hits that ceiling with no problem.

That's without other uses on the horizon cited by Josh Lowensohn on the Webware blog. Subscription music services will change how we listen to music, online storage sites will change how we store our data.

Not many of us are using those yet. There also aren't many who regularly download high-definition movies. And it'll be a while before the services mature enough that we'd want to entirely depend on any of them.

A company like Vudu can already deliver consistent, great-quality video across the Internet. Others will quickly get better.

If caps like Comcast's don't cripple them.

Tags:
Comcast,
internet,
video

Reader Comments Read all comments (22)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

So I think a good way to handle this problem is to post the names and phone numbers of whoever you manage to reach so we can all start calling them.

Email addresses work well also.

The key is to have someone's name to go with it. It makes it personal.

I don't watch tv, (don't own one, just a projector) but I do watch movies.

I think the real reason for comcast throttling bandwidth is because they provide cable tv and want you to use their product. It's all about the money.

lberto of MD 11:39PM April 14, 2009

So I think a good way to handle this problem is to post the names and phone numbers of whoever you manage to reach so we can all start calling them.

Email addresses work well also.

The key is to have someone's name to go with it. It makes it personal.

I don't watch tv, (don't own one, just a projector) but I do watch movies.

I think the real reason for comcast throttling bandwidth is because they provide cable tv and want you to use their product. It's all about the money.

lberto of MD 11:38PM April 14, 2009

I honestly think that Comcast should see the errors of their ways. They say that the average consumer won't be affected by the 250gb cap. That's a bunch of bull if I ever heard it. Now a days you have smartphones, iphones, xbox360s, and the like that use bandwith too. I don't agree that they should be allowed to monitor what end users use their connections for, that's what the government is for. Comcast should just leave us alone and do some r&d into a infrastructure that doesn't share nodes on the star network they have now. Yes I'm thinking about leaving comcast, and like most people, I don't like DSL because of it's speed issues as well as contracts must be kept for 1-2 years. Still doing more research on this.

75aces of CA 10:08PM September 26, 2008

Dave's Download

Our in-house gadget guru, Senior Writer David LaGesse, checks out the latest technologies and gizmos, from computer software to GPS systems -- and reports back to you in plain English.


advertisement