Paying the Record Labels Over and Over Again

October 22, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

Record labels shouldn't be able to control what we do with our legally owned MP3 files, argues Michael Robertson within a post by Greg Sandoval in the Digital Media blog.

Robertson is the Web pioneer who's in a court battle with record companies over his MP3tunes.com, which lets users store their music on the Web.

The post was prompted by the launch of a new website, Lala.com. Lala struck deals with the labels and will charge us 10 cents each to stream songs we ostensibly already own. Robertson:

"This is about what users are allowed to do with their music. Are they allowed to put it on their phone and their game devices or on multiple PCs without paying the labels each time?"

Tags:
websites,
internet,
music

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I'm not certain what licenses Lala.com paid to the music companies but it is so effortless to use their site. There are no ads and I can listen to almost every song I could think of. Maybe Robertson needs to just be in court all the time, but as a music listener I'm happy that Apple and lala.com decided to just license the music for me.

Rich McGinness of FL 4:36AM October 24, 2008

The 10 cents is for unlimited streaming of songs that you don't already own. If you own the song you can upload it and listen to it for free. Not to be rude but you didn't even write that much in your blog entry and it was still wrong.

Tom of CA 7:15PM October 23, 2008

Michael also have a post about this in his blog;

http://michaelrobertson.com/archive.php?minute_id=276

John of CA 5:35PM October 22, 2008

Dave's Download

Our in-house gadget guru, Senior Writer David LaGesse, checks out the latest technologies and gizmos, from computer software to GPS systems -- and reports back to you in plain English.

advertisement

advertisement