Amazon Now Streams HD Movies and Shows

April 22, 2009 RSS Feed Print
Amazon's streaming service on a Roku

Amazon's streaming service on a Roku

Amazon has added high-def content to its Internet streaming service. It's a me-too move, with the retailer joining Apple, Vudu, Netflix and other streaming services that offer HD titles.

Also like the others, Amazon's HD can't match the stunning picture of a Blu-ray disk -- or even an over-the-air HD broadcast. I tried the Amazon service and the high-def image is better than what Amazon and others offer in the lower standard-definition. But to my eyes, the high-def version is more like an upscaled DVD than true HD.

The service is available through PCs as well as devices that carry the Amazon service, including newer TiVos, the Roku Player and Sony TVs that have the Bravia Internet Video Link. Amazon can now also stream its 40,000 titles to Panasonic TVs with Viera Cast.

The HD streams worked smoothly for me on a Roku. They do take a minute or more to load up, or about twice as long as standard fare.

For watching an action movie with lots of special effects, I'd probably spring the extra $1 for an HD version of movie from Amazon. That's the typical premium over the same movies in standard definition, which can be rented for $2.99 to $3.99.

For a drama flick where it's mostly faces and dialogue, save the $1 and stick with SD.

Tags:
Amazon.com,
technology,
television

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Dear Anthony,

I'm amused by the "duh" at the end of your comment since you clearly don't know too much about what you're ranting against. And knowing what HD means "to you" isn't really relevant.

Blu-Ray video quality is typically better, yes. But the "HD" standard includes 1280x720 AND 1920x1080, in both interlaced and progressive modes (1080i and 1080p), and allows for all kinds of different bit rates which also drastically alter the image quality and file size of each movie being authored. So claiming that using the term "HD" automatically means Blu-Ray quality is just ignorant on two levels - "HD" doesn't specifically designate any of those details and neither does "Blu-Ray." All "Blu-Ray" really designates is a physical disc specification, on which you could store a bunch of recipes if you were so inclined...the term does not inherently infer anything about video quality. And if you really want to argue semantics, the term "HD" has been used to describe anything above standard definition...

If you really want Blu-Ray quality you're not just looking at a slightly longer download...more like 10x longer. A ~45min episode of a TV show in 720p H.264 format will run you around 1.5GB on iTunes, and that includes two audio tracks. On BD that number would jump to more like 10GB at least. Those are rough averages but you can't expect people to embrace digital downloads as a viable entertainment option if it takes all night to download one episode of a TV show. To get that number down to anything acceptable you would have to sacrifice bit rate to an extent that would render the whole notion pointless.

TinkerTenor of CA 11:10PM January 17, 2011

HD should mean exactly the same regardless of the company offering it. HD to me means 1080p. If you advertise HD, to me that means blue ray quality. There is NO reason why companies cant offer blue ray quality. After all, its just a download. Being higher quality just means it will be a longer download. Duh!

anthony of FL 7:30AM June 24, 2009

can u use a xbox 360? for this service

Carlos of RI 8:42PM May 10, 2009

Dave's Download

Our in-house gadget guru, Senior Writer David LaGesse, checks out the latest technologies and gizmos, from computer software to GPS systems -- and reports back to you in plain English.


advertisement