The Subprime Perps: Wall Street and Main Street Both

March 28, 2008 RSS Feed Print

This commentary aired on PBS's Nightly Business Report on March 27, 2008:

It's always the little guy who gets fleeced, while the smart money sneaks out the side door.

Right?

Well, not this time. With the subprime crisis metastasizing throughout the financial system, we're seeing something that's as reassuring as it is troubling: Wall Street is taking its lumps along with everybody else.

Nobody seems real surprised when ordinary Joes take on too much debt, or don't bother to read the fine print, and end up losing their shirts.

But now, it turns out the financial geniuses on Wall Street did the same thing. The collapse of investment bank Bear Stearns is basically a gargantuan foreclosure, with JPMorgan repossessing the distressed property.

And instead of fleeing ahead of the storm, the smart money at Bear got trapped. Hundreds of executives had their savings tied up in Bear stock. Their fortunes have evaporated, practically overnight. One investor even lost $1 billion. Thousands of jobs are disappearing, at Bear, Lehman, Goldman, Morgan Stanley, and other money firms.

Wall Streeters tend to suffer more luxuriously than the rest of us, and it might be second or third homes the spent bankers end up unloading, rather than the literal roof over their heads. But this still demonstrates that the binary view of the subprime crisis—Main Street is the victim, and Wall Street is the perpetrator—is vastly oversimplified.

Yes, there were villians, and, yes, there were dupes. But everybody got greedy. That includes homeowners who wanted more house than they could afford, along with bankers who wanted higher returns than they could get from conventional securities. If Wall Street committed a crime, then Main Street was an accomplice. And now they're both feeling the pain.

Tags:
subprime mortgages,
PBS

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Well it looks as though the giants at Wells Fargo and Washington Mutual are at it again. In the midst of a forebearance agreement my loan was sold from Wells to WAMU. However, the agreement which was similar to Annie's was not transferred and consequently my home was foreclosed upon. Since the FHA was involved, I'll have my day yet. The good bad and the ugly of this are yet to be played out. Hopefully, the good people of FHA will come riding over the hill to my remains.

of 11:29AM April 09, 2008

We are working with Wells Fargo Financial to pull our home out of foreclosure. What are they offering? $5,000 good faith deposit, two consecutive months thereafter of $1,500 per month (all with no written agreement, good faith estimate, or modification on their part) after that they said they write a "payment agreement" for 12 months at $100 less per month of our normal payment and then after the 12 months they want to bring it back to our normal payment ONLY at an ARM (adjustable rate mortgage of 8.75%) even though we have 8.25% now.

Interesting because they want this with a $5,000 good faith payment with no good faith agreement, payment plan, forebearance or modification in writing and then want to put us on an ARM at higher than our current interest rate after 12 months.

How is this working with homeowners? Basically, it seems like predatory lending, in that you either agree to terms that are worse than your current terms or lose your house and who's going to complain because they are already embarrassed about the sitution they are in and the bank can say, "well we tried to work it out but the homeowner didn't want to."

Annie of AZ 2:15PM April 08, 2008

For ten years, the subprime management methods infected World commerce. In that time, in almost every nation, finance organizations created subprime note generator organizations. These peculiar organizations were held off-the-books to protect parent owner organism.

It is unfortunate that USA finance organism first originated the UML models that spread into World finance. In addition, as the new models generated immense returns, non-USA financial organism felt obliged to cooperate or mimic USA models.

In a short time, non-USA financial organisms surrender their USA toxic paper to their Central Bank for redress. Every Central bank sees subprime note funds that exited their nation; and in redress, they expect full refund, interest, and penalties.

At this time, the FBI investigates financial criminal activities. RECO charges seem not coming. In this acceptance or organize financial crime then some see the USA government as an active participant.

Unless the USA acknowledges international law and courts, sanctions placed upon the USA bring financial debacle to all USA commerce.

Unless the USA demands and applies hardened ISO Standard bookkeeping with real-time functional active transparency, recovery seems beyond reach.

Some nations will lead international finances into and through this international subprime management affair.

Given that the USA recognizes international law and courts, then with functional ISO Standard bookkeeping (in sorting many international subprime management affairs) the USA may re-model international finances in a new and inter-active dynamic World commerce.

Thank you for your time and labour in my agendas.

Anthony Maxwell Taylor Fokker 3:12PM March 29, 2008

Rick Newman

Rick Newman

The global economy is mysterious, even scary. Chief Business Correspondent Rick Newman connects the dots. In addition to his writing for U.S. News, Rick is the co-author of two books: Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon on 9/11, and Bury Us Upside Down: The Misty Pilots and the Secret Battle for the Ho Chi Minh Trail.


Read Rick's latest blog entries here.

advertisement

advertisement