What GM’s Downsizing Means for Drivers

June 3, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (28)

If General Motors is getting small, something big must be happening.

GM's announcement today that it will close four SUV and pickup-truck plants—and possibly stop building Hummers—is a startling turnaround for Detroit's biggest automaker. The car companies routinely speed up or slow down assembly lines to tweak the mix of big and small vehicles consumers seem to be most interested in. But shutting down several production lines, and possibly killing off an iconic brand, signal a long-term retrenchment.

It's obvious why: With gas prices cresting $4 in much of the country, nobody wants to buy the kinds of big vehicles that have been GM's mainstay. But there are even deeper implications behind the automaker's move. Some of them:

$5 gas. The biggest question among drivers and automakers alike is what will happen to gas prices. GM seems to be betting that they'll continue to go up, which many analysts believe. Goldman Sachs has predicted that oil prices, now around $125 a barrel, could hit $200 a barrel by 2010. That could lead to gas costing $5 a gallon—and maybe even $6. If that happens, demand for large vehicles obviously will get even weaker. That seems to be the scenario GM is hedging against.

Fading profits. When gas was cheap, GM and its competitors made profits of $15,000 per vehicle, or more, on some of their biggest trucks and SUVs. That cash cow has been put out to pasture. The profit margins on smaller cars are much lower—and some small cars are actually loss leaders that produce no profits at all. Even Honda and Toyota will feel the sting, since they too produce trucks and large SUVs that have become much harder to sell.

Speedier breakthroughs. The costlier gas gets, the stronger the incentive for other kinds of fuel. While announcing its truck cutbacks, GM also affirmed plans to build the Chevrolet Volt, an electric plug-in vehicle that could get the equivalent of 50 miles per gallon or more and run on power from the electrical grid, which would be much cheaper than $4 or $5 gasoline. Skeptics have argued that GM's plans to sell a commercially viable plug-in by 2010 are unrealistic. But Toyota and Nissan have now joined the race to field some kind of plug-in by 2010, and GM's move away from big vehicles could intensify the competition. That's the best way to foster breakthroughs.

Big shifts by other automakers. GM is a wounded giant, but it's still the biggest automaker in the United States, with the heft to change the market. All the automakers are curtailing their big-car lineups, while focusing on smaller crossovers and sedans. But now they may have to accelerate their own shifting plans. The plants GM is closing produce 700,000 vehicles, about 40 percent of the company's output. GM will offset some of the lost production by ramping up output of smaller cars, which will significantly change the kinds of vehicles available to buyers. Like GM, Ford and Chrysler have been overreliant upon large vehicles that are now stacking up on dealer lots. Since GM is their top competitor, they'll have to keep pace.

Better cars. It may take a few years, but as the automakers invest their engineering talent in more efficient cars and new technologies—rather than "horsepower wars," the competitive mantra of the past dozen years—the payoff will be cars that do more and require less fuel. It will be a painful transition for drivers and car companies alike. But the car you drive 10 years from now might just be a prototype for the gas-free automobile.

Tags:
General Motors,
car manufacturers,
cars

Reader Comments Read all comments (28)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

How ridiculous to think that an Electric Bike (I assume plugged into the SCE power grid) is going to change the situation and solve the problem; need for inexpensive and non-carbon footprint technology. Depletion of electricity means more power electric plants which continue to silt up among other things, the Colorado river. The river is no longer reaching it delta and is drying up. Not only that, but Radio Wave Sickness can be created with as little as 60 Hz. There are too many psuedo greeners out there trying to make money on the situation seemingly for their Narcissistic selves, ie; draw attention to themselves as some sort of "Green" guru, when all that needs to happen is to to get back to the original true green developments out of the 60s and 70s everyone should practice, without trying to be a self-styled guru seeking teflon accolades.

Anderson, Ojai

www.OjaiandVenturaVIEW.com

INFORMATION: Colorado River (see) http://www.spotimage.com/web/en/2497-the-colorado-river-is-no-longer-reaching-its-delta-the-story-behind-spot-2-s-last-image.php

ELECTRICAL POLUTION: http://www.electricalpollution.com/

J. Anderson of CA 2:14AM May 29, 2011

WHY DO THE OIL COMPANIES HAVE SUCH A PULL WITH WHAT OUR VEHICLES GET FOR MILEAGE ? WE ALL KNOW THAT EVEN V8'S ARE CAPABLE OF GETTING 40 OR 50 MILES TO THE GALLON;SO WHEN CAN WE QUIT BEING DICTATED BY THE OIL COMPANIES AND START SAVING US ALL A LOT OF MONEY EACH YEAR ? ANY NEW VEHICLE WITH THAT GETS 30 MPG IS CRAP,TECHNOLOGY HAS IMPROVED SO WHY ARE WE GETTING SUCH POOR FUEL MILEAGE OUT OF EVERYTHING PRODUCED ? I WOULD LOVE A RESPONSE TO THIS;THANK YOU

RICH MANZARI of SC 4:57PM January 15, 2009

I opt for the 4 day work week. Plus many jobs can be done on the computer at home. That way many people would only commute 3 days a week. We have the capacity to do this; we need the leadership and vision. We are trapped into thinking that we have to "go to work." Do the work at home. Students in high school could go 2 to 3 days a week. On the other days they could be logged in doing assignments and projects. This is doable. Where is the vision in this country?

skyreader7 of TX 12:42PM June 17, 2008

Rick Newman

Rick Newman

The global economy is mysterious, even scary. Chief Business Correspondent Rick Newman connects the dots. In addition to his writing for U.S. News, Rick is the co-author of two books: Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon on 9/11, and Bury Us Upside Down: The Misty Pilots and the Secret Battle for the Ho Chi Minh Trail.


Read Rick's latest blog entries here.

advertisement

advertisement