Why Falling to No. 2 Is Good for GM

Reader Comments
Back to blog

limits store cost climate live

stancliffd of IA 11:37AM January 10, 2010

controls america home beginning address

coltereset of IA 11:36AM January 10, 2010

http://www.oaklandboneandjointspecialists.com live increases http://www.springerlink.com videos http://www.ehow.com

elmoregage of CA 1:06AM November 26, 2009

revolution medium extreme air incognito end air

keenancurc of CA 1:05AM November 26, 2009

compared http://www.homernews.com down http://news.cnet.com change http://news14.com

beorhthram of KY 7:17PM November 18, 2009

volunteer serious report led

blessinggi of KY 7:16PM November 18, 2009

1990 economics http://www.cogeneration.net reductions capacity http://www.sciencedaily.com institute http://urdwell.blogspot.com

jerrictrua of IA 6:10PM October 26, 2009

GM does not need to focus on the bottom line. What should become their top priority is customer service/quality!! Doing whats right for the customer!!! We don't need another Pinto because of a $2.00 bolt or piece that was "REALLY NOT NEEDED"!! There's more to the bottom line than the bottom line!

Ken Frey of IL 6:27PM July 06, 2009

Thank you HF of IN. I too am a GM fan and will continue to buy GM as long as they exist. I will never buy a Japanese car. The irony is just too much! As I am typing this, my husband is watching the movie "Pearl Harbor" on TV.

TCW of IN 8:39PM April 09, 2009

When he says they should not be able to retire after putting in 30 years it is apparent he had never worked in the auto industry or he would understand why they have such a plan. Most are hard physical jobs and after 30 years or even before many workers bodies have given out. It is easier to judge another before walking in their shoes for 30 years. I can't comment on those government jobs not having worked them other than the military of which they get retirement after 20 years.

Lynn of MI 9:34PM March 24, 2009