How To Measure Your Well-Being Against the Dow

March 9, 2009 RSS Feed Print

Are you better off than you were in 1997? The Dow Jones Industrial Average certainly isn’t. As we keep hearing, the Dow, which has fallen about 55 percent from its October 2007 peak, is slumming around at its lowest point since April 1997.

If your personal well-being were tied directly to the Dow, that would mean you’ve gone precisely nowhere over the last 12 years: No raises, no quality-of-life improvements, no lessons learned, no fears conquered, no wisdom gained.

It’s a question worth asking. So I asked myself if I’m better off than I was 12 years ago. First, I refamiliarized myself with the world in 1997. That was the year Princess Diana died in a Paris car crash. El Nino was causing weather havoc around the world. General Motors and Ford were the two largest companies atop the Fortune 500. (By 2008, they had fallen to 4 and 7, and they’ll probably fall even lower this year.) It was a blase year for movies: The top draw was Men in Black. ER and Seinfeld were the top TV shows.

[Have you found innovative ways to survive the recession? Share them: flowchart@usnews.com]

I don’t know what my net worth was in 1997, but I’m pretty sure I felt more secure then than I do now. I was married with one baby and another soon to arrive. My wife and I never talked about whether our jobs were in jeopardy. We owned a nice home that felt like a stretch when we bought it, but seemed more manageable as our household income rose. We didn’t estimate how much our house appreciated each year, we just assumed that it would. We certainly didn’t worry about it falling in value. That never happened.

Twelve years later, a lot has changed. I’m divorced, so I’ve gone from belonging to a two-earner family to a one-earner household. Among other things, the safety net is a lot smaller if one of us – well, me – becomes unemployed. My income is higher, but with two kids, so are my expenses, and the amount left over after the bills are paid is arguably lower than it was 12 years ago. I rent a home instead of owning one. My vast portfolio of global holdings – er, I mean, the few meager investments I’ve been able to make – have plummeted in value, just like everybody else’s.

[See 10 ways to survive without a bailout.]

So if wealth and job security are the gauge, I’m standing in place, or maybe even drifting backward. That’s partly due to personal circumstances, but everybody has personal circumstances like divorce, illness, accidents, and mistakes. We have to factor those in. Still, all told, I could feel pretty gloomy about my progress.

But I don’t feel gloomy. Since 1997 I’ve also gotten a lot smarter. I have a much stronger skill set and more realistic expectations. I can see more clearly how the world works. A bit of adversity – accentuated by the current recession – has helped me learn how to be happy with less. I think way more about conserving energy than I did in 1997, about cutting needless expenses, about pooling my resources with others.

[See where greed still carries on unabated.]

I didn’t have a backup plan in 1997. Today, I have three or four. There’s no guarantee those plans will work if I need them, but at least I realize there may not always be a spouse or employer or government out-bailer standing by to help when needed.

Warren Buffett said recently that “people have really changed their behavior like nothing I’ve ever seen.” He talked about consumers abandoning luxuries, being scared and confused, and taking to the sidelines until they better understand what’s going on. “There’s been a reset in people’s minds,” he said.

That’s another thing I’ve accomplished since 1997: A mental reset. I don’t have to spend every penny of my paycheck. If you’re President Obama trying to jump-start the economy, of course, you don’t want any resets. Our economy depends on people spending money – as much as possible. But if you’re an individual, it makes perfect sense to hoard your resources, in case you end up as one of the unlucky unemployed. And once you’ve broken your addiction to stuff, it’s easier to plan for a rainy day – and survive it.

[See why I, Rick Newman, deserve a personal bailout.]

Buffett thinks America’s best days still lie ahead. So do I. I’m hoping that all the additional lessons I’ll probably learn through the remainder of this recession will help me be even better prepared to thrive when better days dawn. But I also realize that may take awhile: Forecasters now say the Dow could drop even further, to levels not seen since 1995. That’s the year two losers blew up the Oklahoma City Federal Building and O.J. Simpson got acquitted of murder. Come to think of it, it would be nice if we could just stop at 1997, even if we have to stay there for awhile.

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Linda Lohman is obviously an idiot (perhaps due to age - poor excuse), who lacks even the most infinitesimal of comprehension skills.

Rick Newman refers to the Dow twice in the first paragraph and again in the second and last - which article did you read Califorlorn?

That the author interjected touch stones from the years at which the DOW now resides, and personal recollections apparently knocked YOU off of your favorite subject Linda . . . that subject being YOU, you Ditzy Old Witch!?

Robert Wallin of TX 5:19PM April 30, 2009

I cannot see that the title of this article matches the TEXT! There was no formula to provide the reader something to measure. And I sure don't entertain the idea that I'm in the same predicament as this writer. IF this article were to be re-written withOUT all the "I" pronouns, it could involve the reader. But as a retiree on a fixed income, this stage of my life is NOT even close to measuring anything against the DOW. In fact, I find no mention of the DOW. Possibly DOW means Darn Obfuscate Writer.

Linda Lohman of CA 3:32PM March 12, 2009

2wellread is right - OJ got chased in his Bronco in 1994, acquitted in 1995. Sharp eyes. Correction since made. ~ Rick Newman

Rick Newman of NY 10:37PM March 09, 2009

Rick Newman

Rick Newman

The global economy is mysterious, even scary. Chief Business Correspondent Rick Newman connects the dots. In addition to his writing for U.S. News, Rick is the co-author of two books: Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon on 9/11, and Bury Us Upside Down: The Misty Pilots and the Secret Battle for the Ho Chi Minh Trail.


Read Rick's latest blog entries here.

advertisement

advertisement