Why a Chrysler Bankruptcy Won't Faze Car Buyers

April 23, 2009 RSS Feed Print

If Chrysler declares bankruptcy or liquidates, it will be a historic corporate failure. But car buyers might not notice that much.

Executives at the No. 3 U.S. automaker have tried practically everything to stay in business, including an attempted marriage with General Motors last fall, begging the government for money, and now, a risky plan to merge with Italian automaker Fiat.

Nothing seems to be working. GM, which has severe problems of its own, said no. The Obama administration decided Chrysler is too small and weak to survive on its own. The only way the government will plow more money into Chrysler – beyond the $4 billion it’s already spent – is if the Fiat deal flies.

[See 7 American cars worth bailing out.]

But that looks endangered, too. Fiat has its own money problems, and it’s suddenly interested in buying GM’s Opel division, to strengthen its position in Europe. Merging with Chrysler, as a way to re-enter the U.S. market, may suddenly be a lower priority.

Meanwhile, Chrysler's creditors still haven’t made necessary concessions, which are required by the end of the month if Chrysler has a chance to avert bankruptcy. Consulting firm CSM Worldwide sees a 95 percent likelihood of Chrysler declaring bankruptcy, and the government is supposedly helping Chrysler prepare for a Chapter 11 filing.

[See what GM must do to survive.]

If that happens, it will directly affect 50,000 Chrysler workers, and thousands more at suppliers and dealers. But the impact on consumers will be much more limited. Here’s why:

Chrysler has been shrinking for years. The automaker’s market share is only about 11 percent, according to J.D.Power & Associates, down from 16 percent ten years ago. GM’s Chevrolet brand alone sells nearly as many cars as Chrysler’s three divisions. With overall industry sales down about 40 percent from their 2005 peak, there are simply too many automakers and too many dealers selling more cars than Americans want to buy. Even if Chrysler and all its brands disappeared overnight, there would still be an oversupply of cars and factories in the U.S. market.

[See 5 reasons to buy an American car.]

Chrysler’s vehicles are the wrong kind. When gas hit $4 per gallon last year and Americans downsized their taste in cars, Chrysler suffered more than any other automaker. That’s because it’s far more reliant on big trucks and SUVs than anybody else, even GM. “The inferior quality of its existing product portfolio and its heavy truck mix leave the company poorly positioned,” the government’s automotive task force declared in its March 30th findings on Chrysler. The Fiat deal was supposed to fix that, since Fiat builds some small cars popular in Europe. But under the best conditions it would take at least two years to start selling those here, and that would solve just part of Chrysler's problem.

[See 5 reasons to shun American cars.]

The company has few killer products. Out of 25 or so Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep nameplates, CSM counts only four as “unique:” The Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Ram pickup, Dodge Viper, and Chrysler Town & Country minivan. Most of the rest, like the Dodge Durango SUV, Chrysler Sebring sedan, and Jeep Patriot are similar to many other vehicles in the market – and in most cases, not as good.

The best vehicles will probably survive. If Chrysler declared bankruptcy, it could still end up in a kind of merger with Fiat or another suitor, such as Nissan, Hyundai, or a Chinese automaker. The difference would be a much more severe downsizing across Chrysler’s entire operation, resulting in fire-sale acquisition prices for the most valuable assets. If that happened, brands like Jeep and the Dodge Ram would probably survive in their current form. But the umbrella brand – Chrysler – is so weak that CSM predicts it could disappear entirely.

[See what it’s like inside GM’s fight for survival.]

GM and Ford could benefit. A lot of consumers still insist on buying from the Detroit 3, but few limit their loyalty to just one of them. That means many Chrysler customers could shift over to Ford and GM – which might be just the kind of help they need to fix their own problems. So patriotic buyers who want to spend their money supporting the home team will still be able to. There would just be fewer players on the team.

Tags:
Chrysler,
General Motors

Reader Comments Read all comments (10)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Chrysler still has no clue. The sales drop-off in Chrysler products is not just a result of bad design, poor reliability, or - as Chrysler would have us believe - the wretched economy and high gas prices. The reason prior Chrysler and Dodge owners have no interest in new Chrysler products, even at bargain prices, is that prior owners have already been subjected to all the swindles they care to deal with. In my opinion, the Chrysler warranty and extended warranty departments conspired with crooked Chrysler and Dodge dealers to deny warranty coverage for items clearly covered in the written contracts. This all started about 20 minutes after Chrysler allied itself with Daimler of Germany. Our ownership of Chrysler products ended with a 1996 Dodge Intrepid. It was the best road car we ever owned, our first with air bags and ABS, and it achieved as much as 28.5 MPG at 70 MPH with a very powerful V6 engine. I just got tired of fighting the crooked dealer service departments. My wife's 1969 Fiat 850 Spyder was cute as it could be, and performed quite well until high-octane unleaded gas became unavailable. Fiat left the US market long ago. Chrysler's brief partnership with a German company was a disaster for consumers. What are the chances that Chrysler product dealers and the Chrysler warranty departments will be any less crooked when aligned with an Italian company? By the way, I easily won the small claims court cases against the Dodge dealers. I just don't want to go through all that nonsense again. And I don’t want to have to drive 75 miles each way for competent routine service when many Chrysler dealerships are within 10 miles.

Lawrence Kahn of CA 6:59PM May 28, 2009

Chrysler and GM have built pieces of fecial material and charge more than an import of the same catigory. As for the imports Toyota is built in America, the Honda is built in America the Acura is American Honda, The BMW has models that are made in America, I think KIA is now being built in America. So I ask, arn't these cars built in America; American cars?

Rick Waggoner (former GM CEO) testified in congress that GM builds inferior quality products. The next day GM bought full page ads apologize and afirm they will not do it any more. (ya right)

The auto dealers rape you with extreme intrest rates, low ball trade values and list price-plus for parts; and expect us to buy them? Let them reap what they so sorly deserve, let them die out as they should. No government money should have been given to them in the first place, it is soo wrong to reward what I consider preditory, lousy run, corporations with our tax dollars. Throughout the pages before the comment section a main theme in most pro/con why to buy or not is the low quality of american car manufacturing GM & Chrysler Nuff said I believe they are both going to be gone in a few years and the tax payer holding more bad debit. So sad, almost criminal the government could have saved medicare and funded universal health care for the trillions this is going to cost with intrest probally going to China

thomas of FL 5:40PM May 02, 2009

We own a Durango & a restored Jeep. My family (back to my grandparents) has owned more Chrysler vehicles than anything else over the years. We will notice! I like my Chrysler vehicles. We also owned (and recently sold) a 10 yr old Saturn w/200K & still running strong. Obozo just killed Saturn...a reliable, affordable car because of the worthless UAW union. He shouldn't be in the business of micromanaging corporations to begin, but he certainly shouldn't be telling corp which cars they can sell. He also killed GM's SUVs which are their BIGGEST sellers. Yeah, real smart. With Ford being the only American car left not micromanaged by the Usurper, we'll be looking to foreign cars because Ford has too many social agendas on their plate, much like Kodak, to worry about quality.

Anne-Marie of FL 5:43PM May 01, 2009

Rick Newman

Rick Newman

The global economy is mysterious, even scary. Chief Business Correspondent Rick Newman connects the dots. In addition to his writing for U.S. News, Rick is the co-author of two books: Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon on 9/11, and Bury Us Upside Down: The Misty Pilots and the Secret Battle for the Ho Chi Minh Trail.


Read Rick's latest blog entries here.

advertisement

advertisement