6 Small Steps Toward a More Normal Economy

July 17, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (10)

The Great Economic Recovery Hunt has been underway for about half a year, and the quarry bag is still pretty empty. A few optimists have tried to wring hope from fuzzy statistics showing that retail sales or housing starts or some other indicator aren’t as bad as they could be. But with the unemployement rate at 9.5 percent and going higher, that’s been unconvincing.

A recovery that will actually feel like one is probably a year away, at best. But we may finally be seeing signs that some parts of the economy are turning the corner. Here are six:

Booming bank profits. Goldman Sachs earned a scorching $3.3 billion in the second quarter. JP Morgan Chase earned $2.7 billion. Citigroup and Bank of American reported less impressive numbers, but each still turned a profit despite mounting losses on consumer loans. To be clear, the banks’ profits have been subsidized by the government’s TARP program and a bunch of other emergency measures meant to provide very cheap capital to the banks. And it’s obviously problematic that a few Wall Street banks are earning a fortune with taxpayer assistance. But the whole financial bailout was intended, first of all, to get the nation’s financial system back on its feet. One toe at a time, it’s happening. The real test is whether a healthier financial system will help the broader economy recover—or bankers just gorge on the profits, keeping loans as tight as ever.

[See America’s most endangered malls.]

CIT’s lonesome meltdown. Last fall, the feds were so panicky about the economy that just about any bank in a whiff of trouble got bailout funds. The CIT case suggests that the bailout spigot is finally closing. CIT Group is a nonbank lender that services a lot of small- and medium-sized businesses. It’s lost almost $3 billion over the last year and is at risk of declaring bankruptcy. So far, despite company pleas, the government has refused to toss a life preserver. If CIT goes belly-up, it could harm hundreds or thousands of businesses dependent on its loans. But unlike last fall, the government isn’t jumping in just to prevent borrowers and investors from worrying. We already have systems designed to deal with failing companies, like the bankruptcy process and FDIC takeovers. Letting those run their course might cause some pain, but it’s a sign that the system is once again working the way it’s supposed to.

The Federal Reserve’s reality check. The Fed has finally joined the mainstream in its outlook for job losses, after months of optimistic projections that seemed out of touch with the real economy. The latest Fed projections are for the unemployment rate to range from 9.8 percent to 10.1 percent for all of 2009, which means it will peak at some number higher than that over the next few months. The Fed’s prior forecast was about 0.6 points lower. It’s not good news that the Fed sees a worse job outlook than it did a few months ago. But the Fed’s rosy numbers were falling behind reality, making its projections seem more like government propaganda than the combined wisdom of the nation’s economic cognoscenti. More realistic numbers give the Fed’s outlook more credibility—and that is good news, especially since the Fed board members also predict that economic growth for the rest of the year will be a bit stronger than they believed a few months ago. It would be nice to believe that.

[See 8 industries that will sit out a recovery.]

The glacial P-PIP rollout. Relax. You’re forgiven if you can’t remember—or never knew—what the government’s Public-Private Investment Partnership was supposed to do. This is the plan to subsidize the purchase of “toxic assets” (now lovingly known as “legacy assets”) from banks, to get the worst money-losing investments off their books so they’ll start lending money again. It’s a complicated program funded by—you guessed it—taxpayer money, with dubious prospects that the money will be returned. Anyway, the P-PIP isn’t officially dead, but it hasn’t kicked off yet either, and it’s a couple of months past the original estimated start date. It turns out most banks have been able to raise money on their own, which could eliminate the need for yet another government life-support program. If P-PIP fades away with little notice, few will complain.

500 failed banks. Don’t’ worry, they haven’t failed yet, but FDIC chief Sheila Bair may have told a group of senators that 500 additional banks could close before the financial meltdown is over. That’s according to Republican Sen. Jim Bunning of Kentucky. The FDIC typically doesn’t predict bank failures, and an FDIC spokesperson has been downplaying the number and saying Bunning got it wrong. But it’s plausible. Many more banks than that failed during the S&L bust of the ‘80s and ‘90s, and even 500 failures would constitute a small chunk of the 8,000 or so banks in the United States. Here’s the important thing: Last fall, a rumor like this would have sent the markets plunging. This time, the markets didn’t even notice.

[See 11 places with a worse economy than ours.]

Action at AIG. The disaster-prone insurance giant recently sold a car-insurance division for nearly $2 billion, and it’s rumored to be close to selling its valuable American Life Insurance Co., or Alico, to MetLife, for $15 billion or more. This is great news for taxpayers who have lent AIG more than $80 billion so it can wind down its business without triggering a panic. The only way for taxpayers to recoup their money is for AIG to sell off its assets at the best possible price. Since last fall, the only bidders have been bargain-hunters hoping for fire-sale discounts. But a thaw in the credit markets has finally brought out serious deal-seekers. We could even see bidding wars for some AIG assets. Ah, the good ol’ days.

Tags:
JPMorgan Chase,
AIG, Inc.,
Goldman Sachs,
Federal Reserve

Reader Comments Read all comments (10)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

new group new business

clevefeele of 8:30PM November 27, 2009

As far as the Tarp loans (bailouts as some try to depict them) are concerned, they filled the neccessary function of stabilizing the economy of this country when a complete collapse was certain by providing liquidity when private money headed for the hills in the form of a electronic run on our finacial Institutions. It will almost certainly break even at worst and even thats not bad for not allowing everybodys assets falling to zero with the crushing deflation that threatened home prices falling far more and a dollars that would have been worth zilch with the failure of 60 trillion dollars worth of derivitives. Where was everybody planning to move to when all this happened? Its hard to find a country that taxes its citizens less with a reasonable chance of safety with law and order and a opportunity to work, but the yo-yo protesters of the steps government has taken to stabilize a collapsing economy are just fearfull that they might see a Tax increase in the future. If these whiners were alive during the eisenhower administration they would have 3 times the tax burden of today. Most sane people would rather pay a few more dollars in taxes to assure themself that there countrys economy doesn't collapse but these idiots would see their country and all their assets destroyed before acknowledging that private money ran for the hills in total fear and the government saved our collective rearends by becoming the lender of last resort and instituting programs that have put some of this "easily spooked" private money back to work. If the price of this is a few more taxes, take heart because its better than complete collapse.

Mike of VA 6:32AM October 06, 2009

Why is it that Henry Paulson purposefuly let Bear & Steans & Lehmon Brothers fail? Why did we not bail them out what made them not qualify for TARP Money that was given under the Bush Admin.? Wait a minute I know why he did it Henry was once employed with Goldman Sachs. It was just the good ole boy system looking after them. Now Goldman sachs has no competiveness with the comp. I wonder what kind of kick back or how much money he stand to gain from their profits that were made in the second quarter. I know many people who need jobs so now let's see if they can get hired by Goldman Sachs? I am a teacher and as a result of lowere tax revenues we have had to increase our classroom sizes in order to layoff teachers. The state of Calif. is also faced with this as well as other states. What are we doing with our studens future. As a teacher I know what it is like to work for less. As far as the bail out goes. Who is going to bail out the American people when our government fails to pay back all of the money that they have borrowed. We are breaking the back of many american tax payers now. I agree with having a fair tax in which it is a flat tax - then everybody pays their fair share of taxes. I don't agree with a national sales tax - because people are not buying anything from a lot of retailers. Many of our retailers are going out of business - so how would that raise money? I am not an economist by no means. I will say what started the decline of America is by having a corporate tax too high not to encourage businesses to create jobs. Greed is a word that comes to mind in corporate America. Finally enough is enough an a little will do. I don't know if many of you have seen it at the grocery store - but less is in the bags and you still pay the same amount or more for the product. This is all I have to say. Why not hire moms across America to work on auditing budgets across America and live within the means. You can't spend more than you have. Credit is a wonderful thing but it is something that must be used wisely.

Kandi Cooper of GA 6:57AM July 21, 2009

Rick Newman

Rick Newman

The global economy is mysterious, even scary. Chief Business Correspondent Rick Newman connects the dots. In addition to his writing for U.S. News, Rick is the co-author of two books: Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon on 9/11, and Bury Us Upside Down: The Misty Pilots and the Secret Battle for the Ho Chi Minh Trail.


Read Rick's latest blog entries here.

advertisement

advertisement