4 Countries With Better Healthcare Than Ours

September 15, 2009 RSS Feed Print

If the healthcare systems in Canada and Europe are so much worse than ours, somebody ought to tell the Canadians and Europeans.

There's little dispute that the United States has the most expensive healthcare system in the world. Our nation spends about $7,300 per person on healthcare every year, nearly 2.5 times the average for developed countries, which is $2,964, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

[See 4 conundrums that impede healthcare reform.]

But there's intense argument over whether our system is better than that in other countries. Just about everybody with an opinion on the matter has a horror story to support it. To make his case for reform, President Obama has cited several Americans who suffered or died because they couldn't get adequate care or an insurance company denied coverage. Defenders of the U.S. system trot out examples of Canadians or Brits who had to wait so long for rationed care that they developed several new diseases in the meantime. And everybody loves to pick on France, where care is generous but taxes are high and work optional.

Anecdotal snapshots, however, tell us nothing meaningful about an issue as complex as healthcare, since the plight of a given individual reveals nothing about the effectiveness of the overall system. Now we know something more useful: how citizens in various countries rate their own healthcare systems. The Deloitte Center for Health Solutions surveyed 14,000 people in six countries, asking them to grade their own healthcare system from A to F. The standardized results allow comparisons among all six countries.

[See 4 problems that could sink America.]

If you're expecting to hear that the United States scored worst, then surprise! America was only second worst. Germany got the lowest grades, with just 18 percent of Germans giving their healthcare system an A or B. In the United States, 22 percent of respondents gave the healthcare system an A or B. Switzerland got the highest marks, with 66 percent of people giving the system top grades; France was next, at 63 percent.

Here's how all six countries fared. The survey data are from Deloitte. Also included are cost data from the OECD, to give a sense of who's getting the most satisfaction per healthcare dollar:

Canada: Percent rating the healthcare system A or B: 46 percent; D or F: 15 percent; annual healthcare spending per person: $3,895

France: A or B: 63 percent; D or F: 12 percent; spending: $3,601

Germany: A or B: 18 percent; D or F: 44 percent; spending: $3,588

Switzerland: A or B: 66 percent; D or F: 14 percent; spending: $4,417

United Kingdom: A or B: 32 percent; D or F: 20 percent; spending: $2,992

United States: A or B: 22 percent; D or F: 38 percent; spending: $7,290

Many critics of American healthcare would like to see the United States adopt a single-payer system modeled on Canada or the U.K., while free-market defenders insist that government-run healthcare would be a disaster. Deloitte's survey data show that socialized medicine in Canada and Britain is more popular than the quasi-capitalist healthcare system in America—which costs far more. Brits and Canadians may be more satisfied partly because they have a higher tolerance for government bureaucracy than Americans do. But the findings also undercut claims that the British and Canadian systems don't work.

[See why postal-style healthcare might not be so bad.]

The Economist recently derided American critics of Britain's National Health System for creating a bogus bogeyman meant to scare Americans anxious about reform. "Painting an inaccurate picture of the British system . . . helps blind Americans to weaknesses in their own one," the magazine wrote. "The NHS costs half as much per person as the American system costs. Yet it delivers results which are on some plausible measures actually superior. . . . And it does this while avoiding the disgrace that so shames America, of leaving around 46 million people, some 15 percent of its population, without any form of health insurance."

But don't bother asking the Brits about their own system. What do they know?

Tags:
healthcare

Reader Comments Read all comments (534)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

"everybody loves to pick on France, where care is generous but taxes are high and work optional." DAMN !! Where did you heard that ? In France, sure we've a very good healthcare protection, but work is not an option !

Samuel Cour 8:54AM December 31, 2011

I'm not particularly religious but most religions that I know of teach charity and compassion...they also teach responsibility for oneself and ones family, accountability, work ethics and obeying the laws of the land. Some people need and deserve help but I have to wonder how many of that 40 million do not work because they choose not to or because they've learned how to live off the system. How many own designer jeans, drive nicer cars than they need, have boats or in other ways make financial choices that could have purchased health insurance instead? How many are breaking the law by being here in the first place? How many need help because they choose to abuse drugs and alcohol? I would help anyone who sincerely needed it but giving to people who should help themselves is enabling a different kind of disease and it's making our country sick.

Lora of FL 5:03PM June 23, 2011

The seeds of the health care problems were sown many years ago when the medical insurance industry was established without foresight and understanding of the human behavior. The insurance system encouraged the public to use medical care without proper restraint and concern for cost. The insurance companies were only too eager to pay whatever the medical profession wanted because it meant more business volume and made medical insurance more compelling. They are now trying to control the costs but it is too late. The rapidly increasing medical costs, in spite of decreasing cost of technology, contributed to a spiral of wage inflation which made America uncompetitive in the global context and created an unsustainable financial environment. The net result is that the health insurance premiums now exceed what the health care would have probably cost out of pocket if the insurance industry did not exist. One can only understand this if he or she has lived in a country where the medical insurance industry does not exist although admittedly things are getting worse there also as capitalistic greed is being imported. I recently got two knee X-rays and half hour consultation with a capable orthopedic surgeon for less than US $11.00 in India and that was above norm by local standards.

For America, the genie is out of the bottle and there is no way to go back unless there is complete economic demise and we start from scratch.

Haresh Patel of CA 8:52PM January 28, 2011

Rick Newman

Rick Newman

The global economy is mysterious, even scary. Chief Business Correspondent Rick Newman connects the dots. In addition to his writing for U.S. News, Rick is the co-author of two books: Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon on 9/11, and Bury Us Upside Down: The Misty Pilots and the Secret Battle for the Ho Chi Minh Trail.


Read Rick's latest blog entries here.

advertisement

advertisement