What an Obama Do-Over Would Look Like

January 27, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (22)

Many Barack Obama supporters felt a messiah had arrived when he assumed the presidency in 2009. But when it comes to predicting the future, Obama has proved he's a mere mortal.

A year ago, the unemployment rate was 7.7 percent, and mainstream forecasts predicted it might hit 9 percent or so before leveling off. The financial system, meanwhile, was a shambles, with banks barely lending. Stocks were still plummeting, huge companies like General Motors and Chrysler were on the brink of insolvency, and investors were worried that a full-blown depression might unfold.

[See 21 things we're learning to live without.]

Obama focused on the financial crisis, assuming that once he got that fixed, employers would start hiring again and the job market would rebound. Then he moved on to a set of long-term priorities: reforming healthcare, combating global warming, creating sustainable, high-paying "green jobs," pushing America down a path toward energy independence. Remember all those comparisons to FDR's first 100 days? Obama thought in big, historical terms and tried to use his popularity and charisma to remake America.

A crushing recession, however, has driven America in a direction Obama didn't anticipate. Unemployment is now at 10 percent, and it's likely to go higher. Aggressive intervention in the financial markets did in fact prevent a deeper downturn and set the stage for a recovery. But middle-class distress has mounted all the same, and it's wrecking the rest of Obama's agenda. These and other lessons from Year 1 will probably guide a shift in Obama's priorities for the rest of his term. So here are six things the president might do differently if he could relive his first year in office:

Stimulate faster. The $787 billion stimulus bill passed last year wasn't really a job-creation bill, and Obama—and the nation—have been paying a steep price for that. Despite all the talk of "shovel-ready projects," well under half of the money went toward the immediate creation or preservation of jobs. Nearly one third went toward various kinds of tax breaks and credits, which put more money in the pockets of individuals and businesses—where it has mostly stayed. Another big chunk—more than $200 billion—paid for health, food, unemployment, disability, and other extended benefits for the needy. In theory, that money was supposed to flow into the mainstream economy, keeping people employed. If it has, it hasn't been enough.

[See how to live happily on 75 percent less.]

Explain the bank bailouts better. Most of the bank bailouts were inked during President Bush's term, leaving Obama little room to maneuver on them. Still, he could have said from the outset that the bank bailouts were a necessary evil and explained that even if bankers are the most vile people on earth, a functioning financial system is essential for a healthy economy. It would have helped if tough financial reform measures and the new, $90 billion bank tax came sooner, so that it looked like Obama had a coherent plan and wasn't merely pandering to voter outrage.

Apologize for AIG. This bungled bailout is the biggest blot on an emergency economic triage plan that has more or less worked. Obama should just come right out and say that paying off AIG counterparties in full—which cost American taxpayers an unnecessary $62 billion—was a grievous mistake made in the heat of battle. Even though it mostly happened under Bush, Obama should beg forgiveness in his usual humble-magisterial style. Taxpayers got sold out, and it's not good enough for the president to just let it slide or blame somebody else.

Bail out small businesses on a par with big banks. Part of the outrage over the banker bailouts is the impression that they were the only bailouts. More than a year after the big bank rescues, Obama is now talking about tax credits and other breaks for small businesses, as if these heartland enterprises are a tiny afterthought. If there had been less money for Wall Street and more for Main Street a year ago, fewer Americans would feel abandoned by their government.

[See why class warfare will dominate Obama's presidency.]

Stall cap-and-trade. Obama and Congress started pushing this complex legislation, meant to reduce pollution, while businesses were still getting hammered by the recession, finding it tough or impossible to get loans, and trying to figure out how sweeping healthcare reform was likely to affect them. Pushing cap-and-trade regulations at the same time made Obama seem insensitive to the intense pressure on business owners who were trying to keep their companies afloat and their workers employed. It would have been better to save this for his second year or even his second term.

Simplify healthcare reform. Healthcare reform legislation has taken so many twists and turns that it has become exhausting to follow and almost impossible to plan for. And it's not even over! It's true that most people don't like change, but they'll accept it if you explain what's coming and give them room to adjust. The healthcare ordeal, by contrast, has left consumers and business owners alike numb, perplexed, and completely distrustful of politicians, including Obama, who seem to vacillate between wildly divergent stances. Obama's strategy has been to let Congress take the initiative, but that has made him seem wishy-washy on a matter he himself has deemed one of America's most vital priorities.

If he had a chance to do it over, Obama might forget all about FDR and his big ideas, choose one set of pragmatic reforms, get it done, declare victory, and then get back to that tricky little matter of jobs. That's where he's headed anyway.

Tags:
economy,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (22)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Well, that's what happens when you elect a Jughead Commie Moron.

Baldemar Huerta of IA 12:56AM September 28, 2010

wtf

bando of CO 11:11AM March 12, 2010

I agree whole-heartedly that the actions of congress towards the economic/health/jobless rate have been LESS than stellar and probably knee jerk responses to save their jobs in an election year. I, personally thought (and wrote all my congressmen)why not give every middle class family in the country a couple of million dollars? Mortgages could have gotten paid off, credit card debt could have gotten paid off, outstanding loans could have gotten paid off and, of course, consumer spending could have skyrocketed. Notice I said could have...it would have depended on the American public actually doing those things and congress having the faith in the public to do those things. Then we come to what congress actually did and what has happened since. Getting all those non-producing congressmen/women out of congress sounds like a great idea, and it might be. But consider this....If the company you worked for was insoluble and they brought in a whole new corporate staff, what would happen to your job? Maybe nothing. But most likely they'd do what a lot of businesses have done and cut jobs and scale down. I think that's what would happen if suddenly there were a whole NEW congress. Inexperience and unlimited power? No, thanks. Yes, they need to go, but there has to be a way to eliminate them more studiously. No, I don't have any grand ideas about that...yet...LOL

I understand that the global economy is part of our lifestyle now. There's really no way around it with technology being what it is. But I do think America would be better off focusing on us and getting us back on our feet than subsidizing who knows (actually) how much is being given to other countries that either don't really know how to fix themselves or refuse to. We can't be the greatest country in the world AND be the world's biggest debtor at the same time. I think somewhere along the line, the tea parties are going to become the newest political party. Question is, will the power available to them corrupt them as well?

But back to my original thought....yes, we, the American public, have to let government know without a doubt WE are the USA. At the same time, WE should take care not to have knee jerk responses to events that will take time to decipher and repair.

Barrett Beach of TX 10:18AM March 06, 2010

Rick Newman

Rick Newman

The global economy is mysterious, even scary. Chief Business Correspondent Rick Newman connects the dots. In addition to his writing for U.S. News, Rick is the co-author of two books: Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon on 9/11, and Bury Us Upside Down: The Misty Pilots and the Secret Battle for the Ho Chi Minh Trail.


Read Rick's latest blog entries here.

advertisement

advertisement