A State-by-State "Pain Index"

July 9, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (46)

The recession might technically be over, but the funding crunch in state and local governments could actually get worse. The stimulus act passed in 2009 sent about $250 billion to states, to help offset a plunge in tax revenues, which is how most states fund schools, roads, Medicaid, welfare, and many local services. Even with that federal aid, states have had to cut spending by nearly $50 billion, and raise taxes by another $30 billion or so. The combined effect of higher taxes and fewer services directly affects Americans' quality of life—and it could get worse as stimulus spending starts to run out and the federal government begins to deal with its own mismatch between spending and revenue.

[Read more on states where taxes are up and services are down.]

To measure the impact in each state, I created a "pain index" combining tax increases and spending cuts in each state since 2009, based on data from the National Association of State Budget Officers. Here's how each state ranks:

 

State New Taxes Per Person Since 2009 Spending Cuts Per Person Since 2009 Total "Pain" Per Person
Alaska -$3 $1,268 $1,265
California $312 $543 $855
Wyoming $0 $698 $698
Rhode Island $91 $528 $619
New Jersey $6 $596 $602
Delaware $286 $167 $453
Hawaii $96 $348 $444
South Carolina $33 $442 $475
Utah $28 $409 $437
Oklahoma $49 $421 $470
New York $419 $0 $419
Minnesota $83 $330 $413
Maine $71 $322 $393
Arizona $154 $237 $391
Georgia $15 $344 $359
Louisiana -$16 $358 $342
New Mexico $22 $315 $337
Alabama -$3 $338 $335
Virginia $1 $307 $308
Florida $30 $237 $267
Michigan $51 $202 $253
North Carolina $105 $146 $251
Kansas $151 $96 $247
Mississippi $28 $218 $246
Montana $0 $234 $234
Idaho $0 $219 $219
Oregon $141 $66 $207
Vermont $57 $130 $187
Kentucky $37 $134 $171
Tennessee $42 $126 $168
Colorado $107 $60 $167
New Hampshire $121 $10 $131
Nevada $112 $12 $124
Maryland $6 $96 $102
Iowa $23 $75 $98
Pennsylvania $0 $55 $55
Wisconsin $159 -$105 $54
Missouri -$2 $45 $43
South Dakota $7 $14 $21
Massachusetts $135 -$150 -$15
West Virginia -$44 $18 -$26
Arkansas $5 -$44 -$39
Illinois $17 -$79 -$62
Washington $147 -$218 -$71
Nebraska -$1 -$90 -$91
Texas $1 -$93 -$92
Ohio -$106 -$15 -$121
Connecticut $221 -$354 -$133
Indiana -$50 -$131 -$181
North Dakota -$301 -$700 -$1,001

 

Notes: Figures include tax increases and spending cuts that have been enacted since fiscal year 2009, which began on July 1, 2008 in most states. Spending cuts refer to changes in each state's general fund between fiscal years 2008 and 2011, and in some cases is based on proposed budgets for 2011, since final budgets have not been passed in every state. Negative numbers indicate tax cuts or spending increases, and a negative "pain" number means the net burden on taxpayers is lower, not higher.

 

Tags:
federal budget,
federal taxes

Reader Comments Read all comments (46)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I think it is funny how spending cuts are pain. Only to the state employee we did not need anyway. I have not noticed any decrease in the number of state or local employees standing around. States should cut when taxes are too high or when we have a down turn that decreases tax dollars. The only pain is when they ask for more money(taxes). The less dollars goverment has the better the off the people will be.

Richard of GA 11:29AM October 19, 2010

America....Wake-up!

Government has better pay and benefits.

Most have 50 - 100% of base pay for retirement packages. How many in the Private Sector have this perk!

Most are paying a few dollars to $150/month for health care, with the average under $100. Most private sector employees are paying $300 - $500/month.

Base pay on average from studies indicate most govt sector jobs avg 25% more than the private sector.

They truly do not know how to buy or what true costs are for goods and services. You can't find that with 3 - 5 bids, true cost analysis needs to take place. Govts do not understand the benefits of a solid Purchasing organization.

As tax payers, we should be demanding that the govt employees take home pay and benefits are aligned with the Private Sector.

When will we wake up and cut Fannie MAE and Freddie MAC. Both money losers.

I hope the Governor of NJ keeps waking up America, as he has did an excellent job citing the wasteful spending, i.e. increases in Teachers and O/H, when student population has dropped!

Schools, cities, states do not have a clue on how to buy goods and services.

The overhead in govt operations is beyond anything in the private sector. We do not need increased taxes, we need right sizing and leaders like Dave Cote from Honeywell to start shaking things up!

Mark of MI 7:02AM September 24, 2010

The figure for Vermont must only be a survey of wealthy out of state second homeowners ( with additional tax breaks obviously ) that summer in Vermont ...because it sure the heck isn't from the locals !

Patricia of VT 10:21PM September 23, 2010

Rick Newman

Rick Newman

The global economy is mysterious, even scary. Chief Business Correspondent Rick Newman connects the dots. In addition to his writing for U.S. News, Rick is the co-author of two books: Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon on 9/11, and Bury Us Upside Down: The Misty Pilots and the Secret Battle for the Ho Chi Minh Trail.


Read Rick's latest blog entries here.

advertisement

advertisement