How the Economy Will Look On Election Day

July 9, 2010 RSS Feed Print

A lot can still happen before the midterm elections in November. But one thing that's probably safe to rule out is a dramatic improvement in the economy.

In fact, there's a good chance the economy has already peaked for the year, and that has dire implications for President Obama and Democrats hoping to maintain control of Congress. Many Americans probably didn't notice, but the economy grew by about 3.5 percent over the last 12 months. Forecasting firm IHS Global Insight thinks that growth peaked in the second quarter, at about 3.8 percent. Those would be healthy numbers in a normal economy. But much of that growth came from government stimulus spending, the first-time home buyer tax credit, huge capital injections by the Federal Reserve, and other fairy dust sprinkled on the economy by Washington.

[See 10 states where taxes are up, services down.]

The government's potions are starting to wear off. The stimulus spending will gradually wind down over the next couple of years. The Fed has ended its biggest financial maneuver, meant to juice demand for bonds, stocks, and other securities. After being extended once, the home buyer tax credit has expired for good. And with the huge national debt becoming a problem in itself, Congress has begun to shut the door on further requests for aid to the unemployed, strapped state governments, and other supplicants.

Economists are waiting for the private sector to seize the baton, which is what usually happens as the economy heals from a recession. But the private sector isn't getting the message. Hiring remains weak. Home sales have tumbled, despite the lowest mortgage rates in 50 years. Consumers worried about their jobs aren't spending enough to bounce the economy out of its rut. IHS chief economist Nigel Gault foresees "a subdued recovery by historical standards," with growth slowing to just 2.5 percent in the second half of 2010.

[See 5 reasons a double-dip recession could happen.]

Incumbents clinging to their seats—especially Democrats defending President Obama's agenda—will accentuate the positive: At least the economy is growing. Aggressive government action averted a depression. It could have been a lot worse. That's all true, but good-enough arguments will sound unconvincing in November, when the economy will still feel pretty scary. Here's how some key indicators will look on Election Day:

The unemployment rate, which is 9.5 percent now, will probably be higher. It might even cross the unnerving 10 percent threshold again. In a way that would be a good thing, signaling that the most discouraged jobless people—the ones who gave up looking for work—have regained hope and started job-hunting again. But it's hard to rationalize high unemployment as good news, especially amidst the political sophistry of an election.

The stock market will continue to be volatile. It's practically impossible to predict whether stocks will go up or down, but there's a plausible case for a bear market that could easily last until November or later. Some theorists believe the huge rally that lasted from March of 2009 to April of this year was artificially driven by government intervention—especially the Fed's maneuvers, which are now mostly over. And it makes sense that the stock market would take a breather as economic growth slows. This matters for politicians because the direction of stocks directly affects whether voters, particularly those with retirement accounts and investment portfolios, feel better or worse off.

[See how the markets outran the economy.]

European debt problems will probably get worse before they get better. The big bailout for Greece, brokered in April, temporarily stopped a panic, but underlying problems remain and they still haven't been addressed in bigger countries like Spain and Italy. Even worse, some European countries seem headed back into recession, which will intensify the strains. Europe's debt problems matter here because any risk of default triggers fears of contagion, forcing banks everywhere to restrict credit and raise lending rates. That would torpedo the stock market, raise operating costs for companies, and further crimp spending and hiring.

[See what Washington needs to learn from Greece.]

Financial and healthcare reform might represent bragging points for activist Democrats, and sweeping new legislation may very well do some good down the road. But there will be few tangible results by November. Meanwhile, the complexities of new and proposed regulation have added to compliance costs and reduced profitability in sectors like finance and insurance that employ a lot of Americans. On Election Day, the perceived pain may outweigh the potential gain.

[See 4 things financial reform won't do for you.]

A double-dip recession will still be a headline worry. And expect Republican challengers to seize on the hype. Most economists think a double-dip is unlikely, but economic forecasts have been getting weaker, not stronger, and Lord knows the prognosticators have gotten it wrong recently. After steady improvements, consumer confidence has taken a startling U-turn, heading back toward recession levels. A terrible housing market and weak consumer spending doesn't leave much else to fuel a recovery. And the government, which has kept the economy afloat, is out of money.

The question for November isn't whether the gurgling economy will produce Republican gains. That seems inevitable. The question is whether Republicans will regain control of Congress—and if they do, then what? Political analyst Larry Sabato, for one, predicts that Republicans will gain 7 seats in the Senate and 32 in the House—enough to stymie most Democratic plans, but not enough to regain control of either chamber. If that's what happens, Republicans might consider it a blessing. The economy isn't looking so great in 2011 or 2012 either, and the next Congress is going to have to confront the inevitable need for tax increases and spending cuts. Maybe we'll get used to throwing the bums out every two years.

Tags:
elections,
economy,
economic stimulus

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Dean von Germeten wrote:

>>>To all you precocious criminal brats who sold US out, bring back our steel mills, please? (sic)

I was born in the late 50's and raised in Pittsburgh. Even at that time the city was a bit dirty, the rivers well, you would NEVER think about swimming in the river. One of the few cities in the world with inclines (2 cable cars attached on a very steep track such that at any time, 1 was at the opposite end as the other and they passed midway - i.e. they counterbalanced each other), at the top of the Mt. Washington incline was a picture of Pittsburgh at the turn of the century. The street lights had to be turned on JUST TO BE ABLE TO SEE - AT HIGH NOON!!! That was the pollution brought forth by 19th century steel mills. Granted, today's factories are quite a bit better, but they're not perfect. China is polluting the heck out of it's country, just as we once did. Their rivers are dying and being polluted, only when their population screams, the government shuts them down and does not listen (ours is often only marginally better).

>>>Cancel the Fed and nationalize the banks. Reclaim true govt. ownership of all dollars printed, issue citizen bonds and zero interest loans to all US citizens and businesses.

Here I agree with you. The Federal Reserve Act was done very underhandedly. The US has the RIGHT AND ABILITY to coin it's OWN money, it does NOT need to "borrow" money from the "Fed" (which is a PRIVATE corporation). I mean just think about this. The government says they want to borrow some money, so the Fed prints it (they did NOT have it before!!!), hands it to the gov't then, has the GALL to collect interest on money that they created out of thin air. If you do not believe this, then I am sad to say, you do not know how the "Fed" (which again, other than being allowed to exist has NOTHING to do with the government) works.

>>> Renege on public debt. I don't owe int'l banksters squat; do you?

No, but I DO know people that hold T-Bills. Other countries have done this and we (stupidly) have forgiven so much debt to other countries that I can't even count. I do think it's time that we force China's hand here and simply TELL THEM they're going to forgive a few trillion (say 50% of what they currently hold).

>>>Death by firing squad or hang for treason and economic sabotage, all guilty parties, but must include Congress!

The laws that we have are made for primarily lawful people. There are always ways around rules that can be found by lawyers. This is a fundamental problem with a system such as ours. We have too many politicians and not enough statesmen. No one in political office should a) receive any type of pension or retirement fund other than perhaps a 100% personally funded 401k b) be allowed to retain office for more than 2 terms and c) be allowed in any way to influence any politicians, lobby, etc once they leave office.

Bob Plugh of NH 10:32AM July 22, 2010

The Banking industry...

The Insurance industry..

(The drug companies cut a backroom deal and did not make the list)

The student loan industry...

Coal Mining companies....

Electrical Utilities....

Oil Companies...

Industries that are under attack by current administration...

If the industry that you work in is not currently under attack now, will it be next year?

Are you sure enough to expand your company (hire new workers) or start a new one?

Would you invest money in company?

The investors (bond holders) in GM had their investment confiscated by the government and given to the UAW union goons that contributed to the Obama campaign. This was done in a method contrary to hundreds of years of bankruptcy law.

Would you STILL invest money in a company?

How much is average energy cost for a typical company going to go up after climate change legislation passes? (Nobody knows)

How much is the average cost for health care for each employee going to up after the health care bill is fully implemented? (Nobody knows)

How much more is credit going to cost you, assuming you can still get credit, after the financial regulation bill is implemented (Nobody knows)

Oh, I almost forgot: IT IS BUSH'S FAULT

Amused of WA 1:41PM July 15, 2010

It it amazing to listen to Democrates brag about financial wonder produced by " Bill Clinton " and Complain about Obama inherating Financial disaster from Republicals when he took office.

More surprising, is the fact that Republican leadership do not seem to respond by correcting the Economic fact that it was the Republican congress and Senate, who were responsible for crafting the steps taken to improve Economy in mid 90's. They were the responsible for Balanced Budget, as everybody know, that it is the congress which produces Legislation.

Also bear in mind that Nancy Pelosi took over the Gavel in 2006, and it would be interesting to see if she had any proposal or discussion about impending Economic disaster. I remember her as a party of NO NO NO. Why dont the Republicans do not point that out, which the Fact Checker Liberal New media can easily check.

P Patel of TX 5:40PM July 14, 2010

Rick Newman

Rick Newman

The global economy is mysterious, even scary. Chief Business Correspondent Rick Newman connects the dots. In addition to his writing for U.S. News, Rick is the co-author of two books: Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon on 9/11, and Bury Us Upside Down: The Misty Pilots and the Secret Battle for the Ho Chi Minh Trail.


Read Rick's latest blog entries here.

advertisement

advertisement