5 Economic Flubs That Will Cost Democrats Most

Reader Comments

Back to blog

Either it should be tax cuts for all Americans or NO tax cuts for All Americans.

This country is a Republic not a Socialist Country. Being unemployed for 2 years now I DO NOT BLAME PRIVATE BUSINESSES OR THE RICH on the contrary I BLAMED THE FEDERAL GOVT. The federal govt takes our hard earned money and decides where it is to go. Private businesses pays us fairly for the work we were hired to do. The more the govt takes from us the more we ask or hope for a higher pay raise. Private businesses are taxed as well, and if they are taxed more at a higher rate for them to make a profit they would need to do more lay-offs or send more jobs overseas. Employees, American People and business owners are the ones being squeezed to death by the Federal Govt. Federal Govt, Congress should extend all tax cuts to all Americans the richest to the poorest until our country is economically strong, when GDP is strong again that is when the tax revenue will be rolling in again. Also stop giving so much money to others countries while so many of us in America are hurting.

Joanne of NY 2:11PM October 08, 2010

The Republicans present so many targets, I hardly know where to start. With regard to the restoration of tax cuts, I wouldn't be upset if they all expired, but since the economy is shaky it is probably judicious to restore cuts for the lower earners (bottom 99%) at least temporarily. But the Republicans say this is unfair to the high earners and would be "job-killing". Various sources (60 Minutes, Robert Reich on NPR, etc.) have documented that the highest 1% of earners have increased their share of the national earnings from 10% to over 23% over the past 40 years. Put another way, according to census data, the ratio of household income for the top 5% of households, relative to the median household, has gone up from 2.66 in 1967 to 3.62 in 2009*; that is a 36% increase in relative income for the top 5%, and probably much higher for the top 1%. So raising the top bracket by a few percentage points seems like restoring some balance; the top rate would still be far below what it was thoughout the period following WWII.

On the job-killing part, I have to ask the Republicans for their evidence. Just how would the retained earnings create jobs? Buying shares of stock (from someone else) doesn't create jobs; it merely shifts ownership of the existing means of production. Buying IPOs might create jobs, but what % of IPOs are bought by individuals as opposed to hedge funds and persion funds? Buying a Lamborghini or a villa in the south of France could hardly create jobs here in the U.S. On the other hand, tax cuts for the lower 99% of us should show up in the economy much faster (or conversely, letting the tax cuts expire on us will further contract existing spending and consumer confidence).

It is argued that the lower end of the top 1% are owners of small businesses (job-creators) who would be unable to hire more people if their S Corporation profits (taxed as ordinary personal income) were taxed away. Do they think we're stupid? Money spent on hiring (or buying machinery to create jobs) is a business expense and wouldn't get taxed anyway. Sheesh. The Republicans seem to think we will believe any sound bite they throw out because everyone is upset with Washington politics, which they would translate to mean the Obama Administration.

* http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/historical/inequality/taba2.pdf

John of PA 4:52PM October 04, 2010

"Tis a shame that Dems did not deal with extending the low end Bush (and Obama) tax cuts early in 2009 and DO AWAY WITH the high-end tax cuts. They would have had the populace behind them all the way, THEN.

Now, it looks very inept that this is not long since done, AND, worse, we lost the national confidence and resultant job creation that would have resulted from high end tax hikes.

Yes, you heard that right. High taxes at the high end do not destroy jobs. They actually insure jobs. You don't "know" that because you have been listening to liars since Ronald Reagan made it popular to be one.

Muser of NM 11:11PM October 02, 2010

To all that say you have to payfor tax cuts are loking at it wrong.

The money is yours goverment takes and spends it on what ever.

If goverment does not have the money it can not spend it the problem is the the goverment need to look at the thing it has to do verse the ant to do.

Jasen Gibbens of IN 1:02PM September 23, 2010

The federal tax credit was the big reason that put me over the edge and is why I decided to build a new house. I probably wouldn't have done it othewise. So, it was a completely new purchase that wouldn't have happened otherwise. In addition, I bought a house full of new furniture.

So, be careful with your criticisms.

Bottom line -> Incentives work!

Marty Moran of TX 10:23PM September 20, 2010

Keep the government system as it is, voting, but eliminate the politics.

Who wants to be a politician? Those who love power, money, fame...

Exactly the kind of people that we do NOT WANT in power in the government!

Get rid of politics and you get rid of the majority of corruption in the government.

The British government was thought to be the most honest government in the world....that is until about 10-20 years ago, when paid politicians began entering the scene. Doesn't that tell you something. Everyone, and I mean everyone knows that you cannot trust a politician. They tell you lies to your face, and then do exactly what is best for themselves...not for the people!

We need a system of government that is just, works for the good of the people...exactly what we have, without the politics. All we need to do is to come up with a better way to elect people to office, without any campaigning. IE, if you say vote for me, you loose your right to be voted for.

Then, each of the voters vote for those people that they know to be honest, responsible, that care to serve humanity, have real moral integrity. Those people who receive the most votes, are elected. Just like today without the politics.

You end up getting honest people who in positions of importance, instead of the embarassment that we have in power today.

Eyes wide open to what's going on in the world today of HI 10:26AM September 09, 2010

We are missing the boat here. Higher levels of education are great, but, we completely forget the person who has experience as education, which is a much more valuable education.

By requiring that employees must have a certain level of education for any given postion at a company, we exclude the gifted who have not gone to college, yet can out do any college graduate in many things.

Of the many employees I have had to terminate over the years, the majority are college grads as opposed to those with high school diplomas who had better work ethics and a yearning to learn and grow in my business. Of the college grads you would think invaluable, were two MIT grads employed at different times, both of which did not know what end of a screw driver to hold.

Bill of CA 11:24PM September 08, 2010

Many of the government efforts deal with the short term cyclical problem with politically popular give-aways - cash for clunkers; first time buyer support; extended unemployment benefits. What is needed is to deal with the structural problem noted above - but that takes vision and political courage. Paul Ryan's Roadmap is a start.

Bill Bowen of CA 10:46AM September 05, 2010

According to a National Bureau of Economic Research study released in April 2010, the United states is the only nation in the world whose achieved educational level for adults over age 25 has NOT risen over the past 15 years.

Whatever your educational level is, and the job it enables you to do, since we've been standing still for over 15 years while everyone else has been gaining ground, there are more foreigners today with the same skills you have who want your job than there were 15 years ago. In simpler words, there are more competitors for your job than ever before.

Newly minted engineers in China make less than $2,000 a month. There's no American engineering graduate who can survive on only $2,000 a month. The American expects full benefits as well and the Chinese engineer none.

Here's the big surprise -- the Chinese engineer reads and writes English, especially engineering English, just fine. English is a required subject in Chinese schools.

This is why wages in America are going down. It's really simple -- there are more competitors at every level, for every job, than ever before and many or even most of them are very happy to get a lot lower wages than Americans.

Since, like most humans, Americans resist reducing their wages, the alternative way producing corporations can reduce costs to match those of foreign competitors is by laying off American workers and hiring foreign workers instead.

Let me give you a clue -- the foreign competitors aren't going away. In fact, there are more of them than ever and their market success is growing.

Until Americans once again offer the world labor markets something that just can't be gotten anywhere else [best trained workers] at the optimal price, one of two things has to happen -- Americans will accept lower and lower wages, or America will suffer from higher and higher unemployment. [Or the value of the American dollar will fall -- which implicitly lowers the wages of Americans and raises the cost of living here in America because all imported items' prices will go UP as the dollar falls. That's oil, tvs, computers, automobiles, clothing, shoes, and everything else that America mostly imports.]

You can't stop learning and educating yourself at age 25 -- or whenever you stopped -- and maintain your standard of living. There are tens to thousands of competitors out there who aren't stopping their learning and they all want your job. When their cost per unit of output is lower than yours -- you'll be told, like the UAW was told, that it is either wage cuts or job cuts.

For the sake of fairness, if for no other reason, our politicians need to stop glossing over the real problem. they also need to grow backbones and tell the government employees and their unions that the gravy train has gone off the tracks and it is time for either across the board wage cuts or jobs will be eliminated wholesale.

cheery thoughts, eh?

Spock_(rhp) of FL 9:19PM September 03, 2010

Good old log rolling Congress. Ask yourself WHY the federal estate tax was allowed to lapse in 2010 allowing George Steinbrenner (remember him?) to pass from this mortal coil into the cosmos and have his heirs pay $0 in federal estate taxes. Congress is still sitting on their hands and haven't even entertained any legislation to correct this horrific omission.

Pete of WA 11:04PM August 29, 2010

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Back to blog

Rick Newman

Rick Newman

The global economy is mysterious, even scary. Chief Business Correspondent Rick Newman connects the dots. In addition to his writing for U.S. News, Rick is the co-author of two books: Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon on 9/11, and Bury Us Upside Down: The Misty Pilots and the Secret Battle for the Ho Chi Minh Trail.


Read Rick's latest blog entries here.

advertisement

advertisement