How the Facebook Economy Trumps the Real One

January 3, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (44)

I couldn't help but noticing: Facebook has become a startup wonder and Web powerhouse at about the same time that the overall U.S. economy has hit the skids. So I decided to apply some cutting-edge economic analysis to determine whether there's a correlation.

[See 20 companies that cratered in 2010.]

First, a brief economic history of Facebook. Mark Zuckerberg started the site in 2004, while in college, and by 2005 he had relocated to Palo Alto, Calif., where little startups go to get big-time funding and make billionaires of the founders. In 2006, Facebook changed from a small-time membership site to a worldwide social network open to anybody. Microsoft boosted Facebook's profile in 2007 with a $240 million investment that put the startup's value at about $15 billion. Traffic grew in 2008 and soared in 2009, when the number of Facebook users nearly doubled. By 2010, there were a few days when Facebook even drew more Web traffic than Google. Zuckerberg, at 26, became the model for the lead character in a hit movie and Time's Man of the Year. And the social networking site began 2011 with a $450 million investment from Goldman Sachs that set the company's value at about $50 billion—more than Yahoo, Time Warner, or News Corp.

While Facebook has been taking off and Zuckerberg has been banking billions, however, a lot of other things have been going wrong. So I created a few charts comparing Facebook's growth to the unemployment rate, the median price of a home, and the S&P 500 stock index. If you're a conspiracy theorist, you'll be very, very suspicious.

[See why baby boomers are bummed out.]

Since June 2007, for instance, when research firm comScore began tracking Facebook stats, the number of unique Facebook visitors in the United States has followed a trendline very similar to the unemployment rate. Both began an upward spike in the fall of 2008, with a sharp increase throughout 2009. Facebook's growth, according to comScore, started to level off a bit over the last few months of 2010; unemployment also flattened out, hovering just under 10 percent.

So is Facebook responsible for rising unemployment? Not directly, since Facebook itself has added nearly 2,000 jobs since the recession began at the end of 2007. But what about everybody else, especially those who are unemployed? Surely some of them became bored after getting laid off, they joined Facebook, got addicted to the Texas Hold 'Em or Lady Gaga or Sarah Palin or Jackass pages, and dropped out of the labor force. No wonder we have an epidemic of long-term unemployment. Maybe the most popular Facebook pages should have a few job listings posted near the bottom. After all, Facebook knows your employment status, along with the last job you held, your former salary, the bare minimum you'd work for, and the most scandalous thing you've ever done to embarrass your employer.

[See who will prosper in 2011.]

Home values have gone in the exact opposite direction of Facebook's popularity. Home values peaked in the summer of 2006, according to the National Association of Realtors—just about the time Facebook's membership was starting to ramp up. Then, as Facebook's membership surged, home values plunged. You might think there's no connection—until you think about hugely popular Facebook games like Cityville, Farmville, and Frontierville, which have hundreds of millions of users. Can it be a coincidence that Americans have become addicted to fantasy worlds in which they build cities, tend farms, and gamely settle the frontier, while in the real world they default on their mortgages and move back in with their parents? The American Dream is dying in Detroit and Las Vegas at the same time it's thriving in virtual worlds where collateralized-debt obligations, foreclosures, and repo men aren't a problem.

Facebook's impact on the stock markets has been a bit harder to isolate—until you factor in government intervention. The stock market peaked in October 2007, which was nearly the same time as Microsoft's big investment in Facebook. Microsoft has now more than tripled its money. But the average stock market investor endured a nauseating market plunge in late 2008 and early 2009, and is still down about 20 percent from the peak. That started to worry the Federal Reserve, which in 2009 launched its "quantitative easing" program—known around the Fed as the "Facebook Put." Since then, the stock-market trendline turned sharply upward—mimicking the Facebook trendline. If the Fed is ever forced to reveal the details of its inner workings—as some in Congress insist it should—we'll no doubt learn that the esteemed central bankers have spent countless hours obsessing over Facebook and its impact on the broader economy.

[See why "recession-proof" jobs are a myth.]

Corporations, of course, have increasingly used Facebook to tout their offerings, at the same time they've slashed costs, cut payrolls, and enjoyed record profits. The Facebook pages for Coca-Cola, Starbucks, Oreo, Disney, Red Bull, Skittles, and Converse are all among the top 50 most popular Facebook pages (along with Facebook itself)—each with more than 12 million fans. That helps explain the efficiency revolution in corporate America: Why use humans to get your message out when you can use Facebook and avoid the extra healthcare and pension costs? Critics complain that we don't make anything in American any more, but if you look at the brilliant Facebook pages urging people to drink more soda and eat more candy, it will make you proud of American ingenuity.

So it's no surprise that Goldman Sachs, Wall Street's savviest money firm, has now taken a stake in the most powerful economic force on the Web. It may not do much for the Main Street economy, but the financial-technological complex has never been stronger. Best of all—for those in the Facebook Economy—Zuckerberg remains as ambitious as ever, determined to double Facebook's reach and hit 1 billion users. Let's hope that correlation with unemployment was just a coincidence.

Twitter: @rickjnewman

Tags:
Coca-Cola,
Starbucks,
economy,
Facebook,
Sarah Palin

Reader Comments Read all comments (44)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Socializing is becoming obsolete. The mad texters sending 40 messages a day about nothing. Words being taken out of context,because of vocal tones are not present. This country is about the latest gadget. More entertainment out of an I-pod touch, than bowling with the family.

Where have our priorities gone? The dollar continues to decline as the threads of the family are being pulled apart by technology- yes it brings us together .. There is also a price to pay. Your child could be sitting in front of you and texting a Sex offender @ the same time! SCARY THOUGHT We are lost.

Jason Emory of OR 12:12PM January 20, 2011

Zuckerberg is simply a genious,fb is wonderful for work if you think about it.You lost your job?There is postings of job openings and friends can tell you about what new ones they found.Dont blame him for the unemployment its our choice.If we pick to look at the games instead of the posting of jobs its our fault.While we are playing games he is making billions!Yes its addicting in its way but its good way to find out what is happening in the "real" world instead of the cover ups in the media,and come on we should limit ourselves and actually live life you know the reason why we are on earth?Dont blame fb for breaking up your marriage or relationships.Sorry I might have forgotten but who is actually choosing to use most of their time on fb and not with their spouse and gf/bf?Did i miss a mind control thing that made us do what you all are blaming him?The answer is no!You choose not him how to spend your time if you dont spend you time wisely why blame him when you should be blaming youself so plan and use your time to the best.Also it seems as if its the older generation who is blaming him,we are coming up in the world.you should be proud that the future generation is doing this!It shows how much we learned from the best and that is you.i take my parents opinions seriously after all they are more experienced than i am.

Jasmine of TX 1:50PM January 19, 2011

Why not economic downturn?

I was one of the lucky ones.

When my wife caught me flirting with women and went ballistic, she DIDN'T leave me.

She simply banned my Facebook privileges.

It is all so easy so slip into a virtual world of fake connectivity and relived past lives. "Are you on Facebook? Friend me!". Its not that FB is evil- its that people are weak.

Why not comment about your boss? Well I'm self employed so I'd be commenting about me...

Zynga offers so many artificial worlds to take up your time- I was at level 136 of Mafia Wars while my marriage was crumbling...

Zuckermann is not socially awkward- hes a social engineering genius! Zuckermann found a way to bring the cheerleaders and football captains to their knees, trembling before him.

As a fellow geek, I cannot help but admire this-this Wizard!

FR

Frank Rizzo of MA 5:24AM January 18, 2011

Rick Newman

Rick Newman

The global economy is mysterious, even scary. Chief Business Correspondent Rick Newman connects the dots. In addition to his writing for U.S. News, Rick is the co-author of two books: Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon on 9/11, and Bury Us Upside Down: The Misty Pilots and the Secret Battle for the Ho Chi Minh Trail.


Read Rick's latest blog entries here.

advertisement

advertisement