The Bad News Behind a Falling Jobless Rate

January 7, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (4)

It sounds like welcome news. The unemployment rate dropped from 9.8 percent to 9.4 percent, the sharpest one-month drop since 1998. After months of grim news about jobs, it finally seems like things are heading in the right direction.

[See 20 industries where jobs are coming back.]

But the fine print is discouraging. The economy did add 103,000 new jobs in the latest month, which accounted for about half of the steep drop in the unemployment rate, according to forecasting firm IHS Global Insight. But the number of new jobs is much lower than economists expected, and the current pace of job creation is far too weak to offset all the jobs lost during the recession. The other reason the unemployment rate fell is a shrinking labor force. Nearly 400,000 unemployed people stopped looking for work in the most recent month, because they felt no jobs were available. They gave up, in essence, and dropped out of the labor force. And that is not what is supposed to happen as the economy recovers and workers, in theory, become more optimistic.

Such "discouraged workers" have become a key variable in the jobless numbers, and in the overall direction of the economy. There are now about 4 million Americans classified as "discouraged" or "marginally attached to the labor force," which basically means they'd look for work if they thought it were available—but they don't, so they're not. That's in addition to about 14.5 million people who count as unemployed, because they're actively looking for jobs. Four million labor-force dropouts may not sound like a lot compared with a total labor force of nearly 154 million, but those marginal workers represent the difference between healthy growth that would bring the economy roaring back, and the kind of tepid growth we have now, which leaves millions of consumers feeling unsure about their jobs and anxious about the future.

[See why "recession-proof" jobs are a myth.]

A shrinking labor force also masks deeper weaknesses in the economy. The size of the U.S. labor force peaked at about 155 million in October 2008, right after the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the financial panic that led to millions of layoffs. Back then, the percentage of adults either working or looking for work was 66 percent, about average for the last two decades. The labor-force participation rate has since fallen to 64.3 percent, the lowest level since the early 1980s. Fewer Americans are working, and fewer Americans want to work. If the participation rate were still 66 percent, unemployment would be closer to 12 percent—a number nobody would tout as cheerful news.

There's usually a decline in the size of the labor force during recessions, as people who might ordinarily work decide to go back to school, or to stay home and help out around the house, until the job market improves. But the decline in the size of the labor force over the last two years is the sharpest since World War II, and economists now think the labor force could be shrinking permanently. Bank of America Merrill Lynch recently predicted that labor-force participation will tick upward as the recovery picks up, but then resume a gradual downward trend that's been in place since 2000. Their analysis shows that a shrinking labor force could whack a full percentage point off of GDP growth annually.

[See how U.S. consumers are conquering debt.]

That would have a tangible impact on millions of Americans. Slow economic growth means an indefinite oversupply of workers, which would continue to hold down pay levels--even for those with jobs that feel secure. That would make it harder to save, pay down debt, and keep up with inflation. Fewer earners in the economy also means fewer people paying taxes, which would exacerbate federal deficits and state and local budget shortfalls, which are already a big problem. And of course the unemployed will continue struggling to make mortgage payments, maintain health insurance, and in many cases simply put food on the table, straining the social safety net that working Americans pay for.

Economists still expect the unemployment rate to go back up as the economy improves, which, paradoxically, would be good news because it would signal that discouraged workers are regaining some hope and treading back into the job market. IHS Global Insight, for instance, predicts that unemployment will drift back toward 10 percent in 2011, then turn around and end the year close to 9 percent. But that up-and-down trend, typical at the end of recessions, was already supposed to be happening by now. Instead, workforce discouragement seems to be lasting much longer than usual. Optimism, for many, remains as elusive as a job itself.

Twitter: @rickjnewman

Tags:
recession,
employment,
economy,
unemployment

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The roman empire had free bread for whoever showed up for the games.Ie fights beheadings and killings. the masses who bought into tis mind set were manipulated by the roman leadership. The american and Global empire has to keep the food and fuell coming to the tables of people who have no interest in the country or the world. The credit will run out for the American empire. and the world, once the oil stops or a combination of events make resupply impossible. Hurricanes, earthquakes and destroyed food supplys, will cause a reset in the world ecollogical balance.

kenk 2:57PM January 09, 2011

The roman empire had free bread for whoever showed up for the games.Ie fights beheadings and killings. the masses who bought into tis mind set were manipulated by the roman leadership. The american and Global empire has to keep the food and fuell coming to the tables of people who have no interest in the country or the world. The credit will run out for the American empire. and the world, once the oil stops or a combination of events make resupply impossible. Hurricanes, earthquakes and destroyed food supplys, will cause a reset in the world ecollogical balance.

kenk 2:51PM January 09, 2011

Keirsten, how do you know this? Do you deduce this by a few acquaintances you may have or do you have statistical numbers to back up your statements? We may feel that many people we know do not care about their future but in these times it may not be a sign of not caring but depression, of having lost hope of having a better future.One should not assume without real professional research to know how others react to the fact that we are in the worst economic depression since the great depression.What you in your holier than thou attitude assume is the lack of their moral character (thank God your not like those losers) may represent the fact that they see that good paying jobs that pay the bills and leave enough left to save for retirement are gone and not coming back. They see that government has done absolutely nothing to help main street Americans keep their heads above water let alone have hope that there will be a better future.They see banks, health care insurance companies, petroleum companies and drug companies rape their paycheck every week and it just keeps getting worse. Why, I find myself wondering why you are so optimistic!

ellyn of NY 4:20PM January 07, 2011

Rick Newman

Rick Newman

The global economy is mysterious, even scary. Chief Business Correspondent Rick Newman connects the dots. In addition to his writing for U.S. News, Rick is the co-author of two books: Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon on 9/11, and Bury Us Upside Down: The Misty Pilots and the Secret Battle for the Ho Chi Minh Trail.


Read Rick's latest blog entries here.

advertisement

advertisement