Why Low Inflation Seems High

January 27, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (6)

Does Ben Bernanke ever buy gas? Or shop at the supermarket?

If he did, the Federal Reserve Chairman would probably know that a lot of everyday items have gotten more expensive lately. Yet the Federal Reserve—whose primary job is to control inflation, along with unemployment—isn't worried at all about rising prices. If anything, the Fed is worried that inflation is too low, not too high. "Measures of underlying inflation have been trending downward," the Fed reported in its latest update on the economy. "Longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable."

[See why you might be better off than you think.]

The Fed, of course, is technically correct. The overall inflation rate is just 1.5 percent, and not long ago, it seemed like deflation—a more pernicious problem than inflation—might be the Fed's biggest challenge. But the Fed's views don't entirely reflect the real world. For many consumers, inflation is in fact considerably higher than the Fed and many economists make it out to be.

The first reason is gas prices, which have an outsized effect on the psyche of consumers. Few goods gyrate as wildly in price as gasoline, which peaked at $4.05 per gallon in the summer of 2008, plunged to $1.60 six months later, and now stands at about $3.10. With prices posted on practically every corner, gas represents a totemic index of consumer attitudes: confidence rises and falls in inverse proportion to pump prices.

It's not just a psychological effect, though. Gas is a staple item for many people, so when the price goes up, it's hard to save money by buying less of it; people need to commute to work and drive their kids to soccer practice, no matter the price of fuel. And it turns out that the cost of other must-have items has been rising as well. Many of the items getting cheaper, meanwhile, are conveniences that are nice to have, but possible to live without.

The government measures the cost of more than 200 items every month when computing the consumer price index, which is the official gauge of inflation. To determine how inflation affects overall business conditions, economists often measure "core inflation," which excludes the prices of volatile items like food and energy. But to measure the effect on consumers, that makes no sense, since most people can't eliminate food and energy expenditures from their monthly budget. Food and energy, in fact, are major expenses for a lot of people, and for lower-income people more than others.

[See why baby boomers are bummed out.]

To measure the effects of inflation on ordinary people a bit differently, I used government data to determine price increases for things that are essential, and for things that are merely nice-to-have. These are my own designations, and some categories, like toys or pet food, could arguably be labeled as either. But overall, the must-have items are things people can't do without, while the nice-to-have items are much more discretionary.

Since the beginning of 2007, the overall CPI has risen by a very low 8.3 percent, which equates to an annual inflation rate of just over 2 percent. Over the same time, wages have grown by 7.9 percent, which indicates that the average worker is not quite keeping up with inflation. Here's how the prices of a variety of goods and services have changed over the same time period:

Price increases for must-have items

Gasoline: 32 percent

Water, sewer, and trash services: 24 percent

College tuition: 24 percent

Eggs: 19 percent

Butter: 18 percent

Cereal: 16 percent

Funeral expenses: 16 percent

Public transportation: 16 percent

Child care: 15 percent

Medical care: 14 percent

Car insurance: 14 percent

Car repairs: 14 percent

Food, overall: 12 percent

Rent: 9 percent

Household cleaning supplies: 9 percent

Household energy: 7 percent

Milk: 7 percent

Fruits and vegetables: 7 percent

Housing, overall: 5 percent

Clothes: 1 percent decline

[See who will prosper in 2011.]

Price increases for nice-to-have items:

Pet food: 22 percent

Airfare: 21 percent

Dry cleaning: 13 percent

Chicken: 13 percent

Restaurant meals: 12 percent

Cable TV: 7 percent

Movie tickets: 6.3 percent

New cars: 1.2 percent

Sporting goods: 0.5 percent

Major appliances: 0 percent

Hotel rooms: 3.5 percent decline

Tools: 4 percent decline

Furniture and bedding: 6.5 percent decline

Toys: 21 percent decline

Computers: 35 percent decline

TVs: 61 percent decline

[See how U.S. consumers are conquering debt.]

Here's what the numbers reveal: Many things are falling in price, especially electronic items that are made cheaply overseas. That helps keep overall inflation very low. But people strapped for cash aren't buying a lot of laptops, flat-screen TVs, or iPhones. They're probably not taking advantage of relatively low prices on new cars or furniture either, buying used instead or just holding on to what they've got. Flat prices on major appliances are a nice break for consumers—but only if you can come up with $400 or more for a new dishwasher or refrigerator.

Many of the things that poor people must buy, meanwhile, are going up in price the most. It's possible to cut back on food and energy consumption, but not by a lot. Paying the rent usually isn't an option. Working parents can't leave young kids unattended, so the rising cost of child care eats up a growing chunk of their pay. Parents wanting the best for their kids have to come up with tuition payments somehow. And nobody can forestall death—or the rising cost of paying for it.

Everybody gets a break from price declines in a few categories, like clothing and toys. But the inflation gap is a genuine problem for Social Security recipients, other people living on fixed incomes, and anybody hoping for a raise. Overall inflation has been so low lately that there will be no cost-of-living increase in Social Security payments this year, and many other types of payments linked to inflation will remain flat as well. Employers love to point to low inflation to justify puny raises, or even salary cuts. But if raises or cost-of-living adjustments were indexed to things that every worker must buy—like food or healthcare or transportation—they'd amount to 3 or 4 percent per year.

[See how we're learning to be happy with less.]

It's even possible that inflation is lower for people with more money, and higher for people with less. If you have enough money to splurge on TVs, computers, furniture, and a new car every few years, then the inflation rate for the basket of goods you purchase may be very close to overall inflation—which is close to historic lows. But if you can only afford to pay for basics like food, rent, utilities, and gas for your old jalopy, your personal inflation rate could be three or four times higher than the official one. Try explaining that to your boss when it's time to ask for a raise.

Twitter: @rickjnewman

Tags:
inflation,
Federal Reserve,
Ben Bernanke,
gas prices

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Japan central bank impose 0% interest rate since 16 years, and make QE after QE so that small Japan has approximatively printed as much money as big USA (please Google: "global narrow money supply" in pictures). Has Japan created hyper-inflation? NO! Private banks have created worldwide from nothing 1 quadrillion $ liquidities (Google "quadrillion $ derivatives", in text). Has they created hyper-inflation? NO! So the FED QE2 of 0,0006 quadrillion $ will not create hyper-inflation! The only way to create hyper-inflation is to hyper-inflate the financial costs to 21%, as Adolph Volcker did in 1981, rising massively Consumer Prices in the eighties, because farmers have debts, and if the banks want 21% financial costs from the farmers, then farmers must pay 21% interests, so they must rise all food prices! In China, central bank inflate financial costs now, and farmers are forced to rise food prices +10%. In USA, financial costs are low, but israeli traders speculate on cereals, because they want that Tunisia, Egypt, Algeria, Iran etc changes to democratic countries... And banksters speculate also on oil price, because they are allowed from Basel 3 to use a leverage factor of 33! USA would need a QE3, but only combined with a pharaonic project to give work to 50 millions discouraged workers in USA: without pharaonic project, QE3 would be stupid!

Jean-Francois Morf, Charrat, Switzerland 3:58AM February 16, 2011

those who feel inflation is under control and the economy is improving have

their head in a position similar to the ostrich. They most certainly are driving

a foreign car, wearing clothes made abroad, eating imported food(and not

Chilean sea bass) and wondering why everyone is not employed as they are.

If there is an answer you must look inside yourself to find it.

The John of NJ 9:45AM February 12, 2011

Recently the Chinese communist leader told us that the American dollar is a product of the past. Well I hate to say it but that commie bastard is probally right. Our "own" "American" corporations have sold us out to the Chinese for a fast buck. Remember that most of these are international corporations and see no difference between American labor and third world labor. They have been allowed to place the American people upon an unlevel playing field with regards to wages and free trade. Without stiff tarrifs we can't compete with the pitifull wages. Look at lack of environmental regulations in China! And what about red tape that companies have to put up with In the USA. The new carbon taxes, clean water regulations, taxes, fees,lawsuits, fines ect.... Wake up America or it will soon be a quick down hill slide into third world status.

richard of SC 2:33AM February 12, 2011

Rick Newman

Rick Newman

The global economy is mysterious, even scary. Chief Business Correspondent Rick Newman connects the dots. In addition to his writing for U.S. News, Rick is the co-author of two books: Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon on 9/11, and Bury Us Upside Down: The Misty Pilots and the Secret Battle for the Ho Chi Minh Trail.


Read Rick's latest blog entries here.

advertisement

advertisement