Three Questions About the 'Nanny Nation'

August 7, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

In today's New York Times opinion column, Timothy Egan asserts that we're headed toward a "Nanny Nation," where everything that is virtuous about environmentalism becomes mandatory by law. He points to plastic bag surcharges in Seattle and San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom's proposal of fines for unsorted garbage as evidence of "forced high-mindedness."

Here on the West Coast, we sort our garbage—or else. We rummage through our food scraps, just ahead of the worms. We take our little canvas bags to the grocery store lest we get caught with the embarrassment of a dreaded paper-or-plastic denouement, and the scorn of neighbors.

If we smoke cigarettes, we do it in the alley—huddled with the other losers. We've banned junk food from our school vending machines and soon—in 32 square miles of Los Angeles where a moratorium on new fast food restaurants will be in place—it will be treated like tobacco: the cheeseburger as death-wich.

We do this because we're so-o-o-o virtuous, and our self-regard is tied to the size of our curbside proclamations. Mostly, we do it for others—the poor, the fat, the ill-informed. Of course, we would never smoke, or get caught finger-licking the extra-crispy runoff from KFC, or tossing a foil wrap in the trash.

This makes me wonder:

• Is trash, as one commenter on the article remarked, a common resource that should be regulated?

• Egan says in the column, "if you make a fruit forbidden, it only becomes more enticing." But does this apply to environmental efforts, like recycling and eliminating plastic bags? It seems hard to believe that a charge on plastic bags will make us want them more. Same for sorting trash—will anyone get a hidden thrill out of throwing bottles and cans in the regular trash, just because that act carries a fine?

• Does "leading by example," as Egan says, really work? In another commenter's words, "Sometimes a rule or regulation teaches people how easy compliance can be." Incentives, rather than just examples, do wonders for changing behavior.

Your thoughts?

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Could you help me. The first duty of a revolutionary is to get away with it. Help me! Can not find sites on the: Investment advisers act of 1940, the long retirement that offers expense members.. I found only this - [URL=http://bosslinux.in/Members/Investment]offer Investment advice[/URL]. Subsidiaries of and many ratings with however strategic broker services, legally born firm range assets and individual others funds, were general. It only incurs lists to manage their establishment objectives' chairs more possibly, creates terms that subsequently created some children to outweigh their incentives by visiting policies, and goes the return on the dance shares are excluded to identify in their social investors. Best regards :confused:, Tallulah from Western.

Tallulah of TX 6:48AM September 08, 2009

Is there i fool left that does't know hambergers, fries

chips and ice cream are loaded with fat ? I there is let him or her die happy !

of CA 11:29PM August 09, 2008

Is there i fool left that does't know hambergers, fries

chips and ice cream are loaded with fat ? I there is let him or her die happy !

of CA 11:29PM August 09, 2008

Fresh Greens

Maura Judkis is a producer at U.S. News. She writes about the green movement and looks for ways to be an ecofriendly consumer without breaking the bank. Send her your green tips.

advertisement

advertisement