Get Your Chopsticks Ready for Sustainable Sushi

October 22, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (7)

Your mouth may water at the thought of California rolls, spicy tuna, and crispy eel, but the ecofriendliness of ingredients on the menu of your favorite sushi varies widely. Three conservation organizations are helping consumers make better sushi choices with new sustainable sushi guidelines, which were released today. The Blue Ocean Institute, Environmental Defense Fund, and Monterey Bay Aquarium have developed color-coded guides that classify the sustainability and health risks of common sushi menu items, both in English and Japanese. The guides can be printed out or downloaded to mobile phones.

Green sushi lovers may be disappointed to see a few of their favorite ingredients on the "do not buy" list. Love the taste of octopus, bluefin tuna, freshwater eel, or farmed salmon? You're out of luck. Choices on the red list, according to a joint press release from the organizations, are "overfished, farmed with aquaculture methods that pollute the ocean, or caught using methods that destroy ocean habitats or kill large amounts of other sea life." Look instead to the wild Alaskan salmon and pollock, crab, squid, and farmed bass.

The responsibility to choose sustainable sushi may lie with the consumer because, as Gourmet magazine notes, many sushi chefs are slow to jump on the sustainability bandwagon that so many other restaurants across the country have taken up. "The whole tradition of Japanese food is based on what is to hand and what can be found locally," said Caroline Bennett, managing director of U.K. sushi restaurant Moshi Moshi.

To promote awareness for sushi chefs, the organizations hope that people across the country will go to their favorite sushi restaurants this week and ask the chefs about sustainability. I'll be on the prowl for some sustainable salmon and shrimp.

Tags:
fish,
environment

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

David from MA made many excellent points in response to Mr. McErlain's comments. I will add just a few extras.

1) Health information on the sushi guides is absolutely backed 100% by peer-reviewed science and government guidance. Omega-3 levels are from the USDA Nutrient Database, and mercury/PCB recommendations are based on EPA's National Guidance, which was reviewed by the National Academies of Science and found to be appropriate.

2) Nowhere do we say that salmon (wild or farmed) are high in mercury. However, there are numerous peer-reviewed studies showing that farmed salmon have significantly higher levels of PCBs (a probably human carcinogen) and other contaminants than wild salmon.

3) In an ideal world all fisheries would be well-managed, all fish farms would have minimal environmental impacts, and all seafood would be free of contaminants and high in omega-3s. Unfortunately this is not the case, so we actively encourage eco- and health-conscious consumers to pick fish that are good for them and the oceans.

4) Monterey Bay Aquarium, Blue Ocean Institute and EDF are environmental not-for-profit organizations, not lobbyists. In fact our tax status (501c3) places strict limitations on the lobbying we can do. And with respect to nutritional advice, EDF has an active environmental health program with medical expertise on staff.

And in the spirit of full disclosure, I am a marine scientist with Environmental Defense Fund, creator of one of the guides mentioned above.

Tim Fitzgerald of NY 10:25PM October 23, 2008

As the Senior Science Manager for the Monterey Bay Aquarium Sustainable Seafood Initiative (which released one of the three sushi pocket guides), I would like to respond to Mr. McErlain's comment.

The Monterey Bay Aquarium provides a peer-reviewed, independent source of fisheries information that does not have an inherent conflict of interest.

Our consumer pocket guides have, since 1999, become the most widely trusted source of information about seafood sustainability. Our state-of-the-art, science-based methodology -- which we continually update and refine -- provides a fair, proven way to compare seafood products along a variety of sustainability metrics.

Every seafood recommendation on our sushi card and other pocket guides is accompanied by an exhaustive 50- to 100-page scientific report, which undergoes peer review by leading experts, in a manner similar to the way that scientific journals conduct peer review. The contaminant data in each report is based on allowable levels for mercury and PCBs as specified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Geoff Shester, Ph.D. of CA 6:50PM October 23, 2008

I have a post card from the early 1900's. It shows dozens of pilot whales on a beach at Nantucket. Families of locals ( no they aren't trying to rescue them) are shown hacking at the whales with axes, saws and knives, while the, still living whales, watched with bulging eyes as they were cut up alive.

The caption beneath the picture reads, "NANTUCKET ISLANDERS REAP THE HARVEST OF THE SEA"

A couple of observations;

I note these whales had beached themselves before the advent of SONAR, and my, my, how our sensibilities have changed...Free Willy Sushi anyone?

R.L. Schaefer of CA 11:34PM October 22, 2008

Fresh Greens

Maura Judkis is a producer at U.S. News. She writes about the green movement and looks for ways to be an ecofriendly consumer without breaking the bank. Send her your green tips.

advertisement

advertisement