Should Vegetarians Pay Lower Insurance Premiums?

November 17, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)

Many studies have offered evidence that vegetarians lead longer, healthier lives. Knowing this, PETA has offered their money-saving solution to Blue Cross Blue Shield of Vermont: Increase your premiums for meat-eaters, and lower them for vegetarians. "Given the latest news about the effects of E. coli on meat-eaters -- and the mountain of evidence linking meat consumption to some of our nation's deadliest diseases -- this change will benefit Blue Cross Blue Shield's bottom line while also helping to ensure that your policyholders don't flat line," wrote Tracy Reiman, executive director of PETA.

Kevin Goddard, vice president of external affairs for Blue Cross, dodged the issue by pointing out that the discrepancy is illegal under Vermont law. It would also be difficult to enforce - as Treehugger points out, anyone could check the box claiming to be a vegetarian. And what about the flexitarians? Should they get half of a premium cut?

So, here's a poll:

Should vegetarians get lower insurance premiums because they are typically healthier?
Seems fair to me. Why should I pay for other people's heart attacks?
I know plenty of unhealthy vegetarians, and plenty of people who go to the gym before they eat a steak, so I'm not sure.
Totally unfair. PETA has, once again, gone too far.


View results without voting

 

Requires JavaScript

Tags:
health insurance,
environment,
food and drink

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

http://www.newsreview.com/sacramento/californias-state-of-hunger/content?oid=4978550

kaiku of AZ 2:00AM February 10, 2012

With some alterations to the system, I think that their should be premium discounts. In particular to vegans should get the discount, vegetarians still eat a plethora of unhealthy animal products. I do not think meat eaters should have their premium raised either, and overall you have to look at the lifestyle of the person, and do a holistic background check. With the right minds at work, this could be a big disaster, or bloom into something beautiful.

Sara Muniz of UT 8:41PM July 28, 2011

I've heard some non-smokers get discounts. If someone is a vegetarian, give them a discount. If they don't smoke, give them more a discount. If they don't drink, give them a discount. In general, a much higher percentage of meat eaters are overweight (68% vs less than 18%). Vegetarians do have a 50% less chance of developing Heart Disease, the #1 killer. Also less chance of cancer and diabetes. It makes sense. Why should I, as a vegetarian, have to pay more and more every year when I have a clean bill of health, yet some of my friends (same age, meat eaters) are suffering from obesity and Type 2 diabetes? I know A LOT of very healthy, and older, vegetarians who don't deserve the increase rates because of others.

dks of TX 7:54PM March 06, 2010

Fresh Greens

Maura Judkis is a producer at U.S. News. She writes about the green movement and looks for ways to be an ecofriendly consumer without breaking the bank. Send her your green tips.

advertisement

advertisement