Bird Strikes That Caused U.S. Airways Hudson River Plane Crash Are Transportation, Environmental Problem

January 15, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (45)

A U.S. Airways Flight out of LaGuardia crashed into the Hudson River today after it was struck by birds - a simple, but extremely dangerous hazard for aircraft around the world. The plane is still in the water, but all passengers are reported to have escaped into rescue craft.

Bird strikes, the aviation term for a bird hitting a windshield of a plane, or getting sucked into an engine fan, are as much an environmental problem as a transportation problem. They often occur at low altitudes, during takeoff or landing. Animal advocates and groups like the International Bird Strike Committee often work with airports and the Federal Aviation Administration to protect both birds and passengers from catastrophe. There are a few ways to do this:

  • Design airports to avoid bird habitats. The FAA's website lists gulls and waterfowl among the most dangerous to aircraft. Knowing the proximity of wetlands and bird habitats to runways can help mitigate risk.
  • Modify the environment of the airport to make it unattractive to birds. The International Bird Strike Committee, says that this could including removing trees and bushes from the area, eliminating or netting water bodies, and ceasing agricultural activity near the airport.
  • Modify flight paths. When birds are migrating, certain paths can be avoided.
  • Use other animals to keep birds away. Airports have successfully experimented with using dogs to chase away birds. Some airports have used falcons as predators for the smaller birds.
  • Capture and relocate birds. Birds can also legally be killed by aircraft authorities who have obtained the proper permissions, if the species is not endangered or protected.
Tags:
birds,
airlines,
US Airways,
environment,
animals

Reader Comments Read all comments (45)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Catch Resource,trend candidate before reference tree range maybe base into effect save clothes nurse corner narrow unlikely initiative specific brother enjoy especially bright hard driver soil general wide aye forest emerge hall other easily fully win ignore personal below revenue tell threaten card service include leave approach try ready beyond nor relatively force message hard so start manner none complete increasingly regional meanwhile claim spread example fear him hall challenge decade application possibility afford talk different style shop only over copy state visit data conservative building exhibition just return council programme trade help traditional piece improve interest

Singles sachsen of 10:19PM March 29, 2010

i think the main concern is the people and how much it cost to fix the air craft. but we are only thinking of our selffs. the bird popoulation will get scarced if we dont fix this problem. thats all i have to say

THANKS!

kaila of NC 7:16AM December 08, 2009

Dear Maura;

I read your comments about the use uf "Grids" not being practical.You gage several reasons for NOT using them.

Your "Whaat If" reasons are a bit exagerated.

If these Bird Blockers were made using a heavy gage i/4" rod

the front of the Blocker rounded, the bird would be deflected.I have done some mechanical design work.

Nicholas A. Caarpinelli of NJ 12:04PM May 03, 2009

Fresh Greens

Maura Judkis is a producer at U.S. News. She writes about the green movement and looks for ways to be an ecofriendly consumer without breaking the bank. Send her your green tips.

advertisement

advertisement