Rep. Blumenauer on Bikes: "Republicans Don't Get It."

February 9, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)

After Senator Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) proposed an amendment to the stimulus that would prohibit funding of bicycle paths, outspoken bicycle supporter and Oregon Representative Earl Blumenauer went on the warpath. In a blog post he wrote for the Huffington Post, Blumenauer described Republicans as "out of touch."

Said Blumenauer:

To their detriment, they are continuing their trend from last Congress of using the most economical, energy-efficient, and healthy forms of transportation as their whipping post. Investment in bike paths will not only improve our economy, and take our country in the right direction for the future; it is exactly the kind of investment the American people want.

Moreover, bicycle and pedestrian paths are precisely the kind of infrastructure projects our country needs. These projects tend to the most "shovel-ready" and are more labor-intensive than other projects-- therefore putting more people to work per dollar spent.

He also lays out a bunch of bike factoids, such as:

  • Transportation surveys indicate that 52% of Americans want to bike more than they do now - but don't, because of the lack of safe and connected bicycle facilities.
  • More than 50% of working Americans live less than 5 miles from work, an easy bicycle commute.
  • More than 490,000 Americans bike to work.
  • Individually, [bicyclists] are saving $1,825 in auto-related costs, reducing their carbon emissions by 128 pounds per year, saving 145 gallons of gasoline, avoiding 50 hours of being stuck in traffic, burning 9,000 calories, reducing their risk of heart attack and stroke by 50%, and enjoying 14% fewer claims on their health insurance.
  • If we doubled the current 1% of all trips by bike to 2%, we would collectively save more 693 million gallons of gasoline - that's more than $5 billion dollars - each year.

BikePortland checked in with Blumenauer's office today and found out that the anti-bike amendment did not end up in the bill.

What do you think - do bike paths belong in the stimulus bill?

Tags:
cycling,
environment

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I live and commute to work via bike in Austin Texas. Our city buses have racks for bikes, making bike commuting possible for those who don't live close in. Biking is certainly an important element of urban commuting here. I'd like to see that we continue to focus travel toward bicycle trails.

Bike Commuter of TX 1:40PM February 10, 2009

I accept not spending my tax dollars on bike paths when all interstate highways are toll roads.

C Glaser of OH 11:30PM February 09, 2009

If we're going to spend the tax dollars, a good bet is to put them towards bike paths.

In a nation with out of control obesity, sky rocketing health care, a junk food nation that is at the mercy of foreign oil, we can save all around by allowing people to at least have the option to ride a bike - rather than adding another lane to a 6 lane highway or another car to the road. Dollar for dollar it's a good play. If everyone biked to work twice a week, the above problems would be cut in half.

Ed of PA 7:44PM February 09, 2009

Fresh Greens

Maura Judkis is a producer at U.S. News. She writes about the green movement and looks for ways to be an ecofriendly consumer without breaking the bank. Send her your green tips.

advertisement

advertisement