What Enviros Are Saying About Obama's Speech

February 25, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

The best of the blogosphere's commentary on Obama's speech last night, regarding energy and environmental concerns:

"Notice that 'it begins with energy'—before health care, even. Wonder if that says anything about his major legislative priorities. Also noteworthy: Obama reiterated, in no uncertain terms, his support for cap-and-trade legislation (in case anyone thought this might quietly slip under the cushions)." --Bradford Plumer, The New Republic

Mr. Obama also had kind words for often-overlooked areas such as transmission and energy efficiency...Perhaps most noteworthy for clean-energy advocates, Mr. Obama clearly stated his support for a cap on carbon dioxide emissions." --Kate Galbraith, NYT's Green Inc.

"Even the political capital of the popular Mr. Obama is not unlimited. We hope he does not spread it so broadly that he is left without the means to extinguish the fires raging now." -- Editorial board of the Washington Post

"We were especially struck by his determination to pass a carbon "cap and trade" regime, despite the costs it would impose on the economy amid a recession. Only last year Midwest Democrats rebelled against those costs when the Senate debated cap and trade. But in the past week Mr. Obama's green advisers have declared that the Administration will soon formally declare that carbon must be regulated like any pollutant under the Clean Air Act. This will unleash a flood of new regulatory controls across the economy, and perhaps Mr. Obama believes this imperative will drive Congress to act, almost as a kind of relief. But the economic uncertainty alone will further retard business risk-taking just when we need such daring for the economy to recover." -- Editorial board of the Wall Street Journal

"Notice the order here. We address our infrastructure, we focus on our economy through building retrofits and we push forward on renewable energy, all within the overarching context of climate change action. I agree completely. Climate change legislation is huge for efficiency." -- Lane Burt, Natural Resources Defense Council's Switchboard

"Sorry Mr. President, but America did not invent the automobile. You (or your speech writer) made a very common mistake. We may have simplified it, perfected it and made it affordable to the common man, but we didn’t come up with the idea. Credit for the first motorized conveyance goes to a Frenchman, Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot. In 1769 Cugnot built a steam-powered tractor that was designed to pull military equipment...But a German, Karl Benz in 1885, invented the first gasoline-powered automobile. Yes, the same Benz that is part of today’s Mercedes-Benz." -- Rick Trawick, The Examiner

"The GOP solution Jindal offered sounded something like the Obama proposed just before, but included nuclear power and increased oil and gas drilling." --Kate Sheppard, Grist

"The madness continues on the right-wing’s crusade against a mythical high-speed rail to Las Vegas project that Harry Reid is alleged to have snuck into the stimulus bill...In a last-minute change, the total quantity of funds available was increased. But there’s no special plan for Las Vegas. The money will be spread all across the country." Matthew Yglesias of Think Progress, who notes that Louisiana, not Las Vegas, will be getting high-speed rails. 

 

Tags:
environment

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

An organic farms kills with the plow. What do you suppose happens to all those lizards, moles, gophers, ground squirrels, snakes, mice, rats, skinks, salamanders, butterflies, toads, frogs, ground nesting birds, rabbits, insects and the "eco-system in general when the plow cuts through it?

Furthermore, I have seen all of the above listed animals happily co-existing on a cattle ranch - none survive on an "organic farm".

I suspect most enviros live in a city. What do you suppose lived where you do before somebody poured 4 inches of concrete or hot asphalt over that "eco-system", before we had to make way for your clan?

You use electricity? Natural gas? Petro Chemicals? What do you think - hydroelectric dams don't come with a price in animal life. Do you suppose that mines, industry, factories and transportation don't have an environmental price?

Even if we retreat back to the caves - leaving 99% of the human race to die in the process - do you suppose we would remain there, watching our children starve and our parents die at 35?

Do you ever think below the warm and fuzzy surface of an issue? You have the permission of the Nature Goddess - retreat back into her nurturing embrace - not for an "eco-trek weekend", wearing a fanny-pack and sipping bottled water, but forever - in your frail human nakedness. See if the animals you love so much "cut you any slack" - show you any charity... They won't even say "Grace" as they devour you.

R.L. Schaefer of CA 1:48PM April 05, 2009

It doesn't matter whether someone emits CO2 in The US or another nation, it ends up in the same atmosphere. If an immigrant to the US uses less oil, and emits less greenhouse gases, because of a change in our national policies, then the whole planet benefits. If they come here and adopt the wasteful, over-comsuptive lifestyle that the Bush administration promoted and subsidized, then the whole planet suffers. Immigration has nothing to do with the urgent need for global CO2 reductions - wherever we live, we still have to reduce.

The myth of "immigrant hordes" is intended to play to unconscious race-based fears. The fact is that immigrants, including undocumented immigrants, contribute far more to the US economy than they take out. They do difficult, low-wage work, pay taxes for social services they use at about half the rate of native-born, and many pay into social security accounts which they will never draw on. Without immigrants our recession would be even deeper.

It is the relatively well-off individuals and corporations in the US, Europe, and Japan who emit the majority of greenhouse gases, even though we are a small minority of the golbal population. Let's stop blaming immigrants and start cleaning up our own act.

Daniel of CA 8:20PM March 02, 2009

The Dems want to bring in a hundred million immigrants and illegal aliens to perpetuate Dem rule. Comprehensive immigration "reform" is an Obama priority. How is this consistent with CO2 reduction and oil conservation?

Luther of IL 9:46PM February 25, 2009

Fresh Greens

Maura Judkis is a producer at U.S. News. She writes about the green movement and looks for ways to be an ecofriendly consumer without breaking the bank. Send her your green tips.

advertisement

advertisement