-
5 Simple Steps to Make Any Home a Green Home
Tweet Share on Facebook March 16, 2009 Comment (3)What are the five simplest things any homeowner can do to green his or her residence? That's the question the New York Times posed to Eric Corey Freed, the author of “Green Building & Remodeling for Dummies.” The five tips that follow are pretty low-tech, and most are so uninvasive that even a renter can do them without involving a landlord.
-
Freeganism: You're Doing it Wrong
Tweet Share on Facebook March 12, 2009 CommentEnvironmental queries are slowly beginning to make their way into the mailboxes of advice columnists nationwide and, since they're coming from people seeking help with difficult problems, the types of people portrayed in these questions tend to be a little extreme. Take Salon's Cary Tennis column from last month about an environmentalist husband who prohibited his wife from using the dryer or water heater. Through a laborious analogy, Tennis chastizes the environmentalist for being holier-than-thou (and rightly so, in this case, because the wife had already done plenty to be green and at this point, he was prioritizing the water heater over his marriage).
Slate's Dear Prudence faced an environmental query this week, too:
-
How 5 of Your Favorite Clothing Stores are Going Green
Tweet Share on Facebook March 12, 2009 Comment (5)Today's TreeHugger list of 5 Surprising Fashion Brands Going Organic tries to ameliorate two activities that are not so good for the environment - shopping in a mall and fast fashion. We learned last week that shopping in a mall uses way more energy than purchasing from the comfort of your home computer. Fast fashion, too, promotes a cycle of cheaply- and unsustainably-made disposable clothing. These five brands in your local mall are taking some environmental steps that can make you feel better about heading to the mall for the latest trendy tee.
-
Want a New iPod Shuffle? Recycle Your Old One, First
Tweet Share on Facebook March 11, 2009 Comment (12)Apple has just unveiled the new iPod Shuffle - a sleeker, smaller device than the previous iterations, of course - and gadget-lovers across the internet are ravenous for it. It features 4 GB of storage for up to 1000 songs, VoiceOver, a feature that can tell listeners what song they're hearing, and also the ability to store music by playlist. To make the device smaller than the size of a key, volume controls have been moved to the headphones, where they will supposedly be easier to navigate.
What this means for our landfills, though, is that thousands of old iPod Shuffles, many in perfect condition, will be abandoned for landfills. And when technology makes it into a landfill, it often leaches hazardous chemicals into our water supply. Here's what to do if you're buying a new iPod Shuffle:
-
Obama Drafts Van Jones as Green Jobs Adviser
Tweet Share on Facebook March 10, 2009 Comment (56)Author, activist and think tank fellow Van Jones will be joining the Obama administration next week as a special adviser on green jobs, reported the White House Council on Environmental Quality today. Jones will work with agencies and departments to advance the administration's climate and energy initiatives, with a special focus on improving vulnerable communities, according to a White House statement. Jones is the founder of "Green For All," an environmental group dedicated to bringing green jobs to the disadvantaged, and the author of "The Green Collar Economy." Environmental groups are, of course, thrilled with the decision - in their opinion, no one knows green jobs like Van Jones.
But there are a few questions raised - first, about the role of Hilda Solis, Secretary of Labor. A proponent of green jobs, it was thought that the responsibility would fall to her, but Climate Progress (a blog run by Jones' think tank, the Center for American Progress) assures us that, yes, both positions are necessary. "The Labor Secretary can’t tell any other Cabinet officer or agency what to do — so if you want to coordinate a crosscutting initiative that affects so many different departments, including energy, EPA, Commerce, and so on — you need to do this out of the White House." His title, by the way, does not contain the word 'Czar' - another issue raised by the Wall Street Journal regarding 'Czar fatigue.'
Jones has long been a proponent of environmental justice. He, along with other advocates like Majora Carter, try to raise awareness of the fact that the communities most hurt by unsustainable practices are often the poorest. Jones told Mother Jones Magazine last year:
"The only reason that we have the unsustainable accounting that we have right now is because incinerators, dumping grounds, and sacrifice zones were put where poor people live. It would never have been allowed if you had to put all the incinerators and nasty stuff in rich people's neighborhoods; we'd have had a sustainable economy a long time ago... We don't want to be first and worst with all the toxins and all the negative effects of global warming, and then benefit last and least from all the breakthroughs in solar, wind energy, organic food, all the positives. We want an equal share, an equitable share, of the work wealth and the benefits of the transition to a green economy."
Another two favorite quotes from Jones come from his speech at the Power Shift weekend last month:
"We could power the country with clean coal, or we could have unicorns pull our cars for us."
"If women are making 75 cents to a dollar in our green economy, something is wrong with it."
-
10 Ways to Green Your Laundry and Save Money
Tweet Share on Facebook March 9, 2009 Comment (3)Washers and dryers use a lot of energy - the dryer is second only to the refrigerator in energy use for the typical household's appliances - but it doesn't have to be that way. Now that spring is in the air, there are plenty of ways to launder your clothes in a more eco-friendly fashion. Here are some tips:
- If your neighborhood association permits one, use a clothesline. According to the New York Times, if all Americans line-dried for just half a year, it would save 3.3 percent of the country’s total residential output of carbon dioxide, experts say. Pinned to a line outside, your clothes will smell like a spring day. Apartment dwellers don't have to be left out, though. Indoor clotheslines and drying racks are a good alternative for small loads (I have one that fits in my shower).
- When you wash your clothing, use cold water whenever possible. It uses less energy than warm or hot.
- Disposable dryer sheets can amount to a lot of waste. Some people swear by using tennis balls to fluff your clothes (but this is a practice that the Soap and Detergent Association discourages.) A safe bet is dryer balls, which look a little bit like dog toys. Here's one place to buy them.
-
Daylight Saving Time: How Much Energy Does It Really Save?
Tweet Share on Facebook March 6, 2009 Comment (18)From a previous U.S. News article about 13 Facts about Daylight Saving Time:
"Daylight saving time was first used during World War I, as part of an effort in the United States and other warring countries to conserve fuel. In theory, using daylight more efficiently saves fuel and energy because it reduces the nation's need for artificial light."
This fact has long been disputed by politicians and energy experts. Many believe that the extra artificial light needed in dark Daylight Savings mornings cancels out the benefit of brighter evenings. However, a 2008 Department of Energy report to Congress found that Daylight Savings Time does indeed save energy, though not as much as we'd hoped. According to the report, the total energy savings throughout the period of Daylight Saving Time add up to 17 Trillion Btu of primary energy consumption, which is only .02 percent of the country's total use in 2007.
To put that number in perspective, the average household uses 106 million Btu per year. So, the energy savings throughout the period of daylight savings would be roughly equivalent to that of merely 160,000-some households, which is about the population of Vancouver, Wash.
This will be the second year that we adjust for Daylight Savings in March, not April, so don't forget: Sunday is the day to "spring ahead."
-
Local Bottled Water: Green(er) or Greenwashing?
Tweet Share on Facebook March 5, 2009 Comment (5)The passionate debate about bottled water is thus: On one hand, bottled water is healthier than soda and can be cheaper to produce. Bottled water companies say that their industry is supporting the economy of countries that export water, like Fiji. On the other hand, there's plenty of evidence that bottled water is a very un-environmental product, using large amounts of energy and resources to package and ship something that flows from our tap nearly for free. Now, one additional business model for bottled water has thrown its hat into the ring.
Tap'dNY is a company that bottles and sells local New York City tap water, which is often rated as one of the best-tasting tap water sources in the country. By bottling and selling it locally, the company has cut out the emissions from transporting water halfway around the globe. They encourage their customers to drink water from the tap when they're near one. Tap'dNY wants to be the second-choice alternative - a brand that people will reach for when they are on the street and don't have a refillable water bottle at hand, but don't want to purchase an unhealthy soda. The bottles are designed to be reused, and the company, of course, encourages recycling. Their advertising is starkly honest, and there's no deception about the source of the water inside.
The greenest option of all is to bring your own reusable water bottle with you. There are many people who would argue that bottled water is an unsustainable industry, no matter how local the water is, or how many carbon offsets are purchased. But what do you think - is local bottled water green, or greenwashing?
-
24, Late Night with Jimmy Fallon: Two Green Shows
Tweet Share on Facebook March 4, 2009 Comment (2)Two shows - one a longtime obsession for legions of fans, the other an eagerly anticipated new personality - have taken on a green makeover of their sets and practices. Fans of Fox's 24 and NBC's Late Night with Jimmy Fallon will be pleased to learn that the former has gone carbon-neutral, and the latter has retrofitted its studio in an entirely green way.
Here's how the shows are green:
24:
- The eco-friendly production offices replaced incandescent lighting with SFLs and installed motion monitors in bathrooms and kitchens.
- Scripts, schedules and memos are digitally distributed to eliminate paper waste.
- The show's producers purchase wind, solar and hydro power from California utilities for a savings of 940 metric tons of CO2.
- Hybrids and bio-diesel reduced gas usage by 1,300 gallons (though this is just a fraction of what the show consumes each week).
- Unfortunately, to achieve true carbon neutrality, many of the most exciting elements of the show would have to be tampered with. That's why the show has chosen to offset the remaining 1,239 tons of CO2 through investments in carbon credits, instead.
Late Night with Jimmy Fallon:
- Fallon, on the set makeover that he ordered: "Everything is recycled. We are building everything with recycled metals and using all green lighting. We are starting [construction] from scratch so it is NBC's policy that we make everything from the ground up entirely green. Everything…I wrote up a three page Word document and gave it to the set designer. The craziest stuff I asked for - believe it or not, I got."
- The set features sustainable building practices such as low- or no-VOC (volatile organic compounds) paint, seating reclaimed and refurbished from Radio City Music Hall, and carpeting on the audience risers and the band platform from recycled materials.
- Doors and metal were reclaimed from local salvage stores for the set.
-
Online Shoppers are Greener Than Mall Rats
Tweet Share on Facebook March 4, 2009 Comment (2)Prefer to shop from the comfort of your couch or home office? Turns out, you're doing the environment a favor. A recent study from Carnegie Mellon University has found that shopping online - especially from a retailer that ships products directly from wholesalers, rather than collecting and sorting items at a warehouse - can cut out 35 percent of the CO2 produced by an average trip to the mall.
Much of the CO2 that results from purchasing an item comes from a consumer's trip to the mall. Researchers compared an online and mall purchase of a flash drive - calculating the drive's emissions from manufacturer to final destination in the consumer's home - and learned that online retail is more efficient in pretty much any scenario, even when the item is being air shipped overnight (but barely - it's basically a draw). Both e-commerce and traditional shopping were evaluated for the energy used by computers, customer transport, product transport, retail stores, warehouses, and packaging.














