Stylish Recession Cyclists Make Fashion Statements on Expensive Bikes

April 16, 2009 RSS Feed Print

New recession "trend": Riding a bike to work can be stylish.

Well, yeah. This is because many people who ride a bike to work do so in their normal clothes, which also happen to be stylish. It's a common misconception of biking that you need all sorts of un-hip Lance Armstrong gear, like spandex, before you're able to become a bike commuter. For those who are making a leisurely trip to work during daylight hours (not training for an upcoming triathlon), a few adjustments to your normal wardrobe are all that's needed to arrive at work unrumpled. There are really only three things you need to do:

  1. Roll up your pant leg so it won't get caught in the gears (or fasten it back with a cuff).
  2. Wear layers, in case you get hot.
  3. Wear a helmet.

I must emphasize number three, because the New York Times story today is quite cavalier about it. Interviewee James Vicente, a court attorney at the Kings County Criminal Court in Brooklyn, says he's just not that into helmets after witnessing bike culture on a trip to Amsterdam:

“I liked the perversity of it,” he said. “I liked saying: ‘Anyone can do this. It’s normal.’ I never ride with a helmet either, even when people are telling me I’m an idiot. Riding a bike should be normal, and you shouldn’t have to wear a funny Styrofoam hat.”

It deserves capslock: THIS IS DUMB. The reason many people in Europe do not wear helmets when they ride is that drivers are used to bicyclists on the road, making it a safer place to ride. Studies have found that when a critical mass of bikers shares the road with drivers, the drivers become safer, and more mindful of cyclists. Not the case here in America - biking isn't popular enough yet. Until then, get over your vanity, do your hair in the office bathroom, and wear a helmet. Oh, and read this article in the Washington City Paper, which should make you think twice about going without.

Anyway, the Times story focused on a particular brand of status bike - the Dutch Bike, sold in Club Monaco stores and costing nearly $2,000 - and also on men's fashion. Women who bike have it both easier and harder: Easier because we can wear sleeveless shirts in the summer and loose, flowy skirts that will never get caught in the chain; and harder because we can wear loose, flowy skirts that billow up embarrasingly when you pick up any speed at all.

Women who bike to work in a skirt should opt for one that's stretchy or loose, and of course, not too short. If there's a chance the wind could lift your skirt up, wear leggings or shorts underneath, and just slip them off when you get to your destination. Some fashion statements are perfect for bikers - skinny jeans or pants don't even need to be cuffed. A nice pair of flats will do. Put a basket or panniers on your bike to hold your heels and purse.

There are numerous blogs devoted to bike fashion with editors who have devoted themselves to becoming the Sartorialist of the two-wheeled set. I enjoy The Chic Cyclist, who chronicles Bostonian bikers, and Copenhagen Cycle Chic, from the world capital of bike fashion.

Tags:
fashion,
cycling,
environment

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I like this article and I like your concern with wearing a helmet, I think so many people are far to fashion focused and think its stupid, but how fashionable would it be to get brain damage or something like that. Sure you can look cool riding a bike, well my brother seems to think so. I caught him riding home from the beach, no helmet no shirt and yes you guessed it no hands, flying down the road at about 100 miles per hour.

So yes bycicle riding can be fashionable and totally cool, but I just don't understand how people ride when they are on their way to work. i know you say you needn't worry about the lycra part but i have trouble walking to work in some of the clothes i wear, so if you are going to get down to basics in your wardrobe I am sure riding to work will not be any trouble, but if you wanted to wera even the slightest heel of layer. CATCH THE BUS.

kaylorlanna 8:32PM May 11, 2009

Thanks for your thoughtful response - I'm glad you weighed both sides and wrote in. I agree with you that many people perceive safety as a huge barrier to bicycle commuting, and it's something that advocacy and safety organizations will have to fight. The health benefits of biking are proven to outweigh the risks. Certainly, more bikers on the road will improve this further, as it will train drivers to be more cautious. But the roads are not there yet. The amount of bikers is increasing quickly, but there's a still a learning curve for drivers. I hesitate to even say this, because I don't want to scare people away either, but last summer was a particularly dangerous one for bikers, since there were so many inexperienced ones (unlike you) on the road - people were calling it the 'summer of splat.' Of those accidents, there were certainly people who were wearing helmets and who died anyway. That's not always going to be the case, though. You can't really be sure how an accident will turn out - people can suffer major head injuries from simple spills, or from getting doored, while others will get up and walk away with some bruises. I'm a bike commuter too, and I don't think it's worth the risk, even if wearing my helmet gets uncomfortably hot in the summer, or does terrible things to my hair. At the same time, I think that smart bicycling plays a big part in preventing accidents. But to cite that eye-rolling cliche: better safe than sorry.

As for the $40 barrier to entry - if we're getting people out of their cars and onto a bike, a one-time cost of $40 for a helmet is a heck of a lot of saved money compared to the price of a daily car (or even subway) commute. So I don't think cost is the issue - it's comfort, as you've demonstrated. I also think it's really interesting that bike organizations (like the DC one cited in the article I linked to) won't take a position on the issue because it's too controversial among bikers. You may see that as the future topic of a post.

Maura Judkis of DC 5:50PM April 17, 2009

alas...

gwadzilla has been left out

forgotten

before these other bicycle blogs

and in some ways better than these other bicycle blogs

http://gwadzilla.blogspot.com/

take a peek

it may amuse you

gwadzilla of DC 5:34PM April 17, 2009

Fresh Greens

Fresh Greens

Maura Judkis is a producer at U.S. News. She writes about the green movement and looks for ways to be an ecofriendly consumer without breaking the bank. Send her your green tips.

advertisement

advertisement