• Comment (7)

Homeowners Receive $25 Billion Mortgage Settlement, But Is It Enough?

February 10, 2012 RSS Feed Print

About one million distressed homeowners are expected to receive mortgage relief in the form of a major settlement on behalf of big banks. In what is the largest attempt to aid the U.S. housing crisis to date, the government will be collecting approximately $25 billion from Bank of America, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, and Ally Financial, and putting it in the hands of struggling mortgage holders.

Reason for the Settlement. It all started in late 2010 when major mortgage servicers came under investigation for filing the documents necessary to begin the foreclosure process without following proper protocol. Banks were found guilty of signing off on foreclosures without reviewing them on a case-by-case basis and without the presence of a notary public, in order to speed up the process in what is now known as the robo-signing scandal.

[See 50 Ways to Improve Your Finances in 2012.]

The banks involved in robo-signing not only routinely broke the law, but were responsible for evicting thousands of homeowners on the basis of incorrect or invalid documentation, prompting a months-long freeze on all foreclosure proceedings in the nation and undoubtedly worsening the already dire U.S. housing situation.

Well, it's finally time for the banks to pay--to the tune of $25 billion--but many question whether the settlement is really enough to aid homeowners or penalize banks.

Who Is Eligible for Relief?

Details regarding who, exactly, will be granted settlement funds are not finalized, but NationalMortgageSettlement.com breaks down how the money will be allocated:

• $17 billion--principal reductions: Homeowners who are underwater and delinquent/at risk of default on their mortgages as of the settlement date are to have the total principal owed on their loans reduced, for a total savings of up to $17 billion.

• $3 billion--refinancing: Those who are currently paying a high mortgage rate or have an adjustable-rate mortgage that's about to reset can refinance to today's rock-bottom rates, putting lenders at an estimated loss of $3 billion in interest.

• $1.5 billion--cash payments: The 750,000 qualifying homeowners who lost their homes to foreclosure between 2008 and 2011 can expect to receive a $2,000 check.

[See 6 Strategies for Dealing With an Underwater Mortgage.]

The remainder of the settlement will go toward funding efforts such as consumer-protection programs and reforms to servicing standards.

If you think you've got some money coming to you, don't get too excited yet. The next 30 to 60 days will be spent simply selecting an administrator tasked with ironing out the details and enforcing payment. Then it will take an additional six to nine months to determine which homeowners are to be compensated.

Finally, the settlement will be executed over the next three years.

Is It Enough?

Federal officials hope to bump up the total relief dollars to $39 billion, but the question of whether this settlement will be large enough to provide true relief can only be answered with a disappointing "it depends" for now.

Paul Dales, a housing economist with Capital Economics, tells MSN, "You’re hardly skimming the surface. It could help some people a lot, individually. But in terms of the big-picture, overall economy and housing market, it’s really just a drop in the ocean of the problem." Only the five banks mentioned above (and all states but Oklahoma) have agreed to the settlement, while mortgages funded by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are exempt. That cuts more than half of homeowners from eligibility right off the bat.

[See The Future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.]

The New York Times explains that the formula by which homeowners will be compensated is far from simple, although banks will be incentivized to help borrowers with the most severely underwater mortgages first.

Slap on the Wrist for Banks

While the numbers appear impressive at first glance, most experts agree that $25 billion will do little more than put a dent in the total funds needed to pull the U.S. housing market out of its hole. And when it comes to holding banks accountable for the mess they caused, the numbers fall short again. Much of the relief funds going to homeowners will be in the form of "soft dollars," with banks paying out very little cold, hard cash.

Then there's the matter of enforcement. As Matt Taibbi of Rolling Stone explains:

"With the rest of it--collecting on the settlement, enforcement of the decrees, all the stuff put in there to balance the deal in the consumer's direction--there will be an uphill battle from this point forward to get the banks to comply. The banks meanwhile have no such uphill battle. They will get the full benefit of the deal (a release from costly litigation) from the moment the ink is dry."

However, while many are pointing out the flaws in this plan--namely, that it probably isn't enough money to make an impact on the current state of the housing market, or punish the mortgage servicers who have prolonged the housing crisis--those actually in danger of losing their homes due to unaffordable mortgage payments will likely agree that it's better than no help at all.

Casey Bond is editor-in-chief of www.GoBankingRates.com, which provides readers informative personal finance and investing content, as well as the best interest rates on financial services nationwide.

Tags:
personal finance

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

LET ME TELL YOU FOLKS MY STORY...IN 2002, MY HUSBAND AND I BOUGHT 10 ACRES AND PUT A NEW HOME ON IT. OUR REAL ESTATE AGENT DIRECTED US TO A COMPANY WHO COULD BUILD OUR HOUSE, AT THE SAME TIME, MY IN LAWS HAD BOUGHT LAND AND WENT THRU THE SAME COMPANY TO BUILD A NEW HOUSE AS WELL, WELL AFTER MOVING IN AND LIVING THERE FOR ABOUT A YEAR, I GET A LETTER FROM THE COUNTY I LIVED IN STATING WE WERE BEHIND ON PROPERTY TAXES, HAVING ESCROW I KNEW THAT COULD'NT BE POSSIBLE, I CONTACTED OUR LENDER AND EXPLAINED AND THOUGTH EVERYTHING WAS TAKEN CARE OF, ANOTHER YEAR GOES BY AND WE ARE STILL OWING PROPERTY TAXES. COME TO FIND OUT, OUR LNDER WAS PAYING MY IN LAWS TAXES FROM OUR ESCROW, THEY LIVED IN A DIFFERENT COUNTY, THE LENDER PAYS UP OUR TAXES AND OUR HOUSE PAYMENT JUMPS UP $300 MORE A MONTH, I CALLED THE LENDER TO TRY TO GET THINGS STRAIGHT AN CONTINUE MAKING THE NEW PAYMENT, AFTER ANOTHER YEAR, AND ANOTHER LETTER FROM THE COUNTY STATING WE WERE BEHIND ON TAXES AGAIN, I CALLE AGAIN THE LENDER, THEN OUR HOOUSE PAYMENT GOES UP ANOTHER $200/MONTH. WELL WE COULD NOT AFFORD IT ANY MORE SO DECIDED TO SELL THE HOME IN A SHORT SALE INSTEAD OF FORECLOSING, WE HIRED AN AGENT WHO IN TURN, SOLD OUR HOME IN THE SHORT SALE, SO WE MOVED OUT THINKING WE AVOIDED A FORECLOSURE, BUT THAT FELL THROUGH TOO. WE RECEIVED DOCUMENTS ON THE FORECLOSURE PROCESS AND IT WASN'T EVEN OUR HOME. IT WAS MY IN LAWS PROPERTY. SO LONG STORY SHORT, OUR LENDER REALLY SCREWED OUR PAPERWORK UP AND GOT US MIXED UP WITH OUR IN LAWS BECAUSE THEY WENT TRU THE SAME LENDER AS WELL. WE MOVED OUT IN 2008 AND DIDN'T MAKE A HOUSE PAYMENT THE LAST 2 YRS WE LIVED THERE.

CYNTHIA RILEY of OH 2:07PM January 20, 2013

What the banks got away with is pure CRIMINAL. I bought a house in a very nice neighborhood for 274,000.00 I was self employed, and went stated loan. After escrow closed, 2 weeks later, my daughter was born. For the next 8 years, I never missed a payment, some months I sent in a double payment. I worked for a Casino where I was paid minimum wage plus tips. In 2007, I was diagnosed with advanced stage prostate cancer, however, I continued to limp along with the pain and continue working. Finally, the casino found a technicality to fire me. In August,2008 I pleaded with my bank to lower the interest rate. What they offered was a half percent reduction. We went to a modification specialist who guaranteed me that they could get my rate from 6.75 down to at least 1 or 2 percent. At that time Monthly mortage was3,600.00. We were instructed to have no contact with our lender(Chase Bank). Every time I called to check on the progress, the same answer:"We're still working on it. Jan, 2009, my neurologist and urologist retired me because the casino would not allow me to work without a letter from my MD,giving me clear bill of health. My monthly award was $929.00 Finally I started calling the bank and they said they had no knowledge of a company representing us. The Modification even told me they were trying to get past due payments forgiven because of my health. At the casino I was earning over 5,000.00 per month in tips alone, however when they calculated my monthly Social Security award, they did not recognize tips. I had the records of deposits proving I had earned this money. NO. Finally on December 11, 2009 I was returning home from my daily radiation treatment to find the sheriff at my home and a man was changing the lock. My home was sold at auction. From there on, life was a downward spiral. We stayed at the Holiday Inn for 2 weeks until we could secure a rental house. The wonderful new owner said he would open the house one day and we could get our possessions. He called 12-24-09 at 6am and said the house is open. Because it was Christmas Eve, I paid 3500.00 to move 4 miles away in the same city. So here I sit in the rental, cancer is in metastases to 100% bone cancer, with a life expectancy of 2-3 years. They say Retirement is supposed to be the golden years of your life. I can't even afford to eat 3 times a day. Chase auctioned off my home for $425,000.00 New owner sold it 2 months later for $525,000.00 The Bank had all of my medical info and they knew my income depended on tips. They said just sign here. With the economy in the toilet, they took the bail out money and paid themselves 3 million dollar bonuses and up. In the movie Too Big To Fail, the character Hank Paulson, treasurer of the Federal reserve, said" We did it because we were making too much money". The Banks Set us up to fail and they don't want to compensate when they got caught with their hands in the cookie Jar.

Kenton Sellgren of CA 5:47AM September 11, 2012

I rarely participate in these comments, but I really have to share my story with 1 company which has tremendously helped me. I just turned 74, many obstacles have come in the way of my retirement including a divorce a few years ago which really hurt me financially, to be honest I had this feeling that my savings and SS income were not going to be enough. Months and months of research and dealing with big banks - nothing but a big headache and they wanted to charge an arm and leg - I was considering a standard home equity loan but then I started reading about reverse mortgages. Long story short, i found this company while searching online - reverse mortgage lenders direct - they were able to automatically compare lenders for me and quote me a fantastic quote. I am not saying you need to do a reverse mortgage (for me this has been excellent and recommendable) but if you do here is their number 877 700 0534 - you can find the site online search for reverse mortgage lenders direct.

erikjohnson400 of CA 10:35AM May 14, 2012

My Money

advertisement

rounded corners

Slideshows »
10 ‘Digital Utilities’ You Need Every Day

Latest Video

advertisement