Bringing Snack Brands Back From the Dead

August 25, 2008 RSS Feed Print

Not only are snack makers scrimping on ingredients these days, they're also reviving left-for-dead brands in their product lines. Why? When the going gets tough, it's apparently more cost-efficient to resurrect an old brand than to develop a new product, reports the New York Times.

Last week, Kellogg reintroduced Hydrox cookies, Oreo-like knockoffs that were discontinued in 2003. (During the second quarter, the maker of Pop-Tarts and Keebler cookies managed to grow its North American snack sales by 6 percent.)

Eagle Snacks, the brand sold off by Anheuser-Busch and subsequently acquired by River West Brands, are also back. Another strategy companies use in a slumping economy includes launching new products associated with well-known brands. (The Times cites Alka-Seltzer Wake-Up Call, a hangover-relief tablet, as an example.)

So, how did these products become "ghost brands" in the first place? A number of factors could be responsible, says the Times: declining sales, stronger competitors, advertising budget cuts, or a company's desire to focus on newer brands.

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Hydrox cookies were the originals. They are being re-released on the 100th anniversary of their initial release.

Charles S. Williams of NC 10:43PM August 25, 2008

Please check your facts. Oreos are Hydrox-like knockoffs, not the other was around as you stated. Hydrox were first introduced in 1908 and Oreos followed in 1912.

Walter of MA 10:19PM August 25, 2008

New Money

Katy Marquardt, a senior editor at U.S.News & World Report, takes a contemporary look at happenings in the financial world and aims to help young investors get going with their portfolios--or just sound cool at cocktail parties. Have a question? E-mail Katy at newmoney@usnews.com

advertisement