Investors' Incredible Shrinking Stock Allocations

November 21, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

A chart posted on The Big Picture today (courtesy of FusionIQ) illustrates how much stock allocations have dropped compared with a 21-year historical average of 60 percent. Today, allocations are 15 percent less than that historical mean. Blogger Barry Ritholtz says that's significant because it mirrors the readings seen at other major lows in 1987, 1990, and 2002. "Now while it doesn't mean we bottom tomorrow (though we could) it does mean stocks are certainly in the eighth or ninth inning of the decline and not the third or fourth (however, as we know in baseball, even the last few innings can get ugly sometimes before the game ends)." He also points out that very low stock allocations are bullish for stocks because it means "investors have sold in droves, thus reducing much of the selling pressure from the market...the low equity allocations suggests a large buildup in sideline cash (i.e., new buying power) from many individuals."

Here's the chart:


(Courtesy of FusionIQ)
Tags:
stocks,
investing,
stock market

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The chart shown may confuse some because it is, in fact, a flow-of-funds chart rather than a net allocation chart. The normalized allocation among individual investors is 60% which, as one comment points out, would naturally drop with the drop in the market. This chart, however, does not portray that allocation. Rather, it portrays the changes in allocations brought on by adding or deleting stock from portfolios, and the rate at which those changes occur. Thus, if this graphed line held steady at 0% (third line up from the red line) it would mean that the allocations remained relatively constant. As AAII members consciously increase or decrease their absolute holdings, however, the graph moves higher or lower (i.e., up or down from 0% change).

Bruce Lick of MN 12:17PM December 03, 2008

If stock market prices are down 50%, how can there possibly be a large buildup in sideline cash? Nobody that I know! We can only wish!!!! The clients I studiply have remained 100% in the market-I think this is the usual case!

I say entire portfolios have plummeted thanks to this great stock market-cash remains virtually the same while the market is down 40-50%-of course, the percentage allocation to stock is down!! Please do the math!

Jeff Haskett, CPA of CA 4:16AM November 23, 2008

My recent (last few years) "allocation" has been 95% FDIC bank CDs and 5% stocks. Obviously, I have regretted not selling the 5% starting in November, 2007. It's now about 3%.

I don't plan to go headlong into stocks, even now. Remember, the depression started in 1929 and the market bottomed in 1932.

of 1:09PM November 21, 2008

New Money

U.S. News Money takes a contemporary look at happenings in the financial world and aims to help young investors get going with their portfolios--or just sound cool at cocktail parties.

advertisement

advertisement