Performance Appraisals: How to Make Them Easy

September 25, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (4)

I know that companies are always trying to get you to set goals in categories like "Trust" and "Teamwork" and "Leadership." Those are gushy little categories that leadership teams just love, but for managers it's a huge pain. Since I promised to make your next year's performance appraisal writing a snap, I'll tell you how to set goals so that the appraisal just falls into place.

A typical goal for teamwork would read something like this: "Suzanne will work with her team members to successfully execute all necessary tasks. She will collaborate with her coworkers in order to increase the departmental knowledge base and facilitate the timely completion of projects."

If this were my goal, and my manager had to evaluate how well I did on "teamwork," she'd probably end up curled into a little HR-avoidance ball. Finally, at the last minute, some additional gobbledygook would be written on my appraisal and I'd be assigned a number (4.2). But that's a pain, and what does it mean, anyway?

Instead, let's get SMART about it. SMART objectives meet the following criteria:

S—Specific
M—Measurable
A—Achievable
R—Relevant
T—Time Frame

So, if I still have to have a goal about "teamwork," let's see how a SMART objective would work.

Specific: Suzanne will participate in semimonthly team meetings. She will present her projects and receive reports on her team member's projects. She will work to build the team's knowledge base by presenting summaries of her projects. Likewise, she will increase her knowledge base by listening to her team's presentations. She will update the team via E-mail at least weekly as to project status.
Measurable: Weekly E-mails, semimonthly meetings, and presentations.
Achievable: This goal is achievable.
Relevant: This builds teamwork and contributes to timely completion of other goals.
Time Frame: Specific expectations are listed (semimonthly meetings, weekly E-mails).

Now, if I have the SMART objective, think about writing that performance appraisal. You just have to ask the question, did Suzanne do what you set out? Yes, she sent weekly update E-mails; yes, she attended team meetings; yes, she did presentations and asked for input. Easy, easy, easy appraisal.

Now, of course, teamwork isn't the only goal. There would be others. But, if they are all written in this fashion, when it comes down to evaluating the employee, it's almost like a check-box review.

This also helps with the delivery because there are no surprises. The employee knows exactly what she was supposed to do and knows in advance if she screwed up. It allows for easy monthly or quarterly checkpoints. You can re-evaluate the goals if things change throughout the year. But, at the end of the day, these SMART objectives will make your life easy. So, when you are writing your goals, make sure you keep this in mind.

Suzanne Lucas has nine years of Human Resources experience, most of which has been in a Fortune 500 company setting. She holds a Professional in Human Resources Certificate from the Society for Human Resource Management. She blogs at Evil HR Lady.

***

Useful Related Posts:
How to Write Performance Appraisals
5 Rules for Laying Off an Employee
How to Make a Lazy Worker Move (Or Move On From a Lazy Worker)

Tags:
employment,
careers

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

It's amazing that such dinosaurs (performance review systems, not the people) are still around. They must be, however, since a book has been published called “Get Rid of Performance Reviews’. Yet despite the outcry against reviews, there's nothing wrong with them that can't be fixed by getting managers off of center stage. Top management can fix the basic problems the review system faces.

Critics argue that performance reviews not only don't accomplish what they're supposed to do - that is, improve performance, enhance employee skills and achieve planned outcomes - they have unintended negative consequences. In many cases, unfortunately, that's true. But it doesn't have to be that way. What companies need to abolish is not performance review itself, but the idea that it's a “management tool. Here are some practiced paradigms that must be discarded:

Performance Review is designed, as the name suggests, in support of managers. If you believe this, your management is one of the roadblocks to exceptional performance. The most useful performance review support work relationships between employees (managers too are employees). Both parties need to address the question of how to best serve the goals and outcomes and align their work efforts.

Performance review is a management tool. Managers are not necessarily the best qualified to assess their staff’s accomplishments. In fact, they may have a very limited or biased view. A more complete and accurate picture results when employees and managers seek feedback from a variety of customers, team leaders, professional peers, and others inside or from outside the unit.

Performance reviews include judgments from a “higher authority”. Judgments produce compliant workers – people who are told what to do – not innovative ones. People hate performance reviews because most of them are fault-finding. How much better to ask, “What did we learn from this? What can we each do different the next time?”

The manager is responsible for obtaining input from the employees. 21st century employees can’t assume a passive role in performance review, providing “tough-minded” self-assessments and valuable insights only on request. They must take the initiative, soliciting feedback from their managers and others. No risk taking to solicit the complete picture and no learning means no improvements.

Managers should be trained in performance reviews, then prepare their employees for the process. If performance review is to be a productive partnership with employees taking the active role and both parties committed to exchanging knowledge and ideas, managers and employee need to be trained together.

Milan Moravec of CA 8:06PM August 19, 2010

Yeah, that anonymous poster is off-base. The objective was about teamwork, not specific responsibilities or results.

Ask a Manager of DC 7:03PM September 25, 2008

Don't listen to the last poster. You're awesome, Evil HR Lady! Rock on!

worker bee of HI 6:21PM September 25, 2008

On Careers

Find savvy job advice from the brains behind top careers blogs, including Ask a Manager, Lindsay Olson, Keppie Careers, CareerBliss, Kontrary, Jobhuntercoach, Career Sherpa, Eat Your Career, Marty Nemko, Infusive Solutions and Marla Gottschalk.

advertisement

Slide Shows

20 Work-Life Balance Hacks

Tips that will help you get more work done and have more time to play.

Quiz: The Hottest Healthcare Jobs This Decade

Take this quiz to learn more about the best jobs for healthcare workers.

14 Must-Have Items for Any Business Trip

Make sure to pack these essentials for your next trip.

advertisement

Latest Video