Why Companies Don't Respond to Job Seekers

November 10, 2008 RSS Feed Print

One of the biggest complaints I hear from job seekers who write to me at Ask a Manager is about companies that don't respond to job applicants: no rejection, nothing.

There's a real divide on the issue. Job seekers think it's incredibly rude, while many companies feel perfectly justified in not putting resources into dealing with candidates they're no longer interested in hiring.

Personally, I think it's inexcusable—throughout the hiring process but particularly after a company has engaged with an applicant in some way, like a phone interview or an in-person interview. It's callous and dismissive and lacks any appreciation for the fact that the candidate is anxiously waiting to hear an answer—any answer—and keeps waiting and waiting, long after a decision has been made.

Some companies defend this practice by claiming they couldn't possibly find time to respond to all the tens of thousands of applications they get. I call BS on that. Have an intern send out a form letter by E-mail. It's fast, and it's free. If your company is so large—and thus your applicant pool so mammoth—that an intern would be overwhelmed by the project, then you're large enough that you're probably using some kind of database to track applicants. Use it to E-mail them a rejection, too.

But if nothing else, employers have an obligation to warn candidates that they may not hear anything: If you're committed to being rude, at least state clearly on your website that you won't get in touch unless you're interested in talking more with an applicant, so that at least people know what to expect.

And for the record, my organization makes a point of responding (often with a form letter, granted, but it's a response) to each and every applicant who approaches us. I am amazed by the number of rejected candidates who E-mail us back to thank us for simply letting them know they are out of the running. Goodwill isn't a bad thing to generate among people we might want to hire in the future, to say nothing of it simply being the right thing to do.

Alison Green is chief of staff for a medium-size d nonprofit where she oversees day-to-day management of the staff as well as hiring, firing, and staff development. She is working with the Management Center to coauthor a book on nonprofit management. Her writings have been published in the Washington Post, the New York Times, Maxim, and dozens of other newspapers. She blogs at Ask a Manager.

Tags:
careers

Reader Comments Read all comments (22)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Couldn't agree more Allison. I am one of those people who email companies to thank them for sending correspondence even if I didn't get the position, simply because it is so rare these days for them to correspond with applicants at all. Thanks for another wonderfully validating article!

Lacey of CO 11:51PM November 15, 2011

I see since this post 3 years ago, maybe it's worse. I was wondering the same, why after interviewing a candidate would you not at least sorry, but no thanks. Worse yet saying I'll get back with you in a couple day, then not and also not respond to the "follow up" email. I understand not responding to the hundreds of applicants that apply for a position but in my opinion there is no excuse to not let someone know who you have interviewed. It's rude and extremely frustrating for the person who is seeking employment. I wonder how they would feel if they were on the other side of things.

Chris of IL 4:24PM October 28, 2011

I think that if you're having job applicants go through up to a half-hour or more of their time filling out applications, then the least that can be done is to be sent a form email saying you're out of the running. Even if your company doesn't have a resume management program, what about Outlook, BCC, and copy-paste? Why be so lazy as to be inconsiderate.

But what I think is worse is when employers actually interview me as a job applicant - over the phone, and/or in person, and then don't respond. I have to take time out of my schedule, prepare for the interview, study up on the company, get my hair done, buy a nice outfit, drive a long way in my beater car, pay for parking that isn't reimbursed, etc., which is a heck of a sacrifice for me as a grad student working two part-time jobs that don't pay much. I interview with these people and the interviewer says "we'll call you next week for next steps" and even ask for my schedule. Then the employer doesn't bother to send anything, not even a two-or-three line email, saying I didn't get the job. Nothing justifies that.

Jaye of OH 12:17AM September 15, 2011

On Careers

On Careers

Find savvy job advice from the brains behind top careers blogs, including Ask a Manager, Lindsay Olson, Keppie Careers, Young Entrepreneur Council, CareerBliss and Glassdoor.

Jobs That May Interest You

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement