Why Companies Don't Respond to Job Seekers

November 10, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (24)

One of the biggest complaints I hear from job seekers who write to me at Ask a Manager is about companies that don't respond to job applicants: no rejection, nothing.

There's a real divide on the issue. Job seekers think it's incredibly rude, while many companies feel perfectly justified in not putting resources into dealing with candidates they're no longer interested in hiring.

Personally, I think it's inexcusable—throughout the hiring process but particularly after a company has engaged with an applicant in some way, like a phone interview or an in-person interview. It's callous and dismissive and lacks any appreciation for the fact that the candidate is anxiously waiting to hear an answer—any answer—and keeps waiting and waiting, long after a decision has been made.

Some companies defend this practice by claiming they couldn't possibly find time to respond to all the tens of thousands of applications they get. I call BS on that. Have an intern send out a form letter by E-mail. It's fast, and it's free. If your company is so large—and thus your applicant pool so mammoth—that an intern would be overwhelmed by the project, then you're large enough that you're probably using some kind of database to track applicants. Use it to E-mail them a rejection, too.

But if nothing else, employers have an obligation to warn candidates that they may not hear anything: If you're committed to being rude, at least state clearly on your website that you won't get in touch unless you're interested in talking more with an applicant, so that at least people know what to expect.

And for the record, my organization makes a point of responding (often with a form letter, granted, but it's a response) to each and every applicant who approaches us. I am amazed by the number of rejected candidates who E-mail us back to thank us for simply letting them know they are out of the running. Goodwill isn't a bad thing to generate among people we might want to hire in the future, to say nothing of it simply being the right thing to do.

Alison Green is chief of staff for a medium-size d nonprofit where she oversees day-to-day management of the staff as well as hiring, firing, and staff development. She is working with the Management Center to coauthor a book on nonprofit management. Her writings have been published in the Washington Post, the New York Times, Maxim, and dozens of other newspapers. She blogs at Ask a Manager.

Tags:
careers

Reader Comments Read all comments (24)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

As someone who has been seeking gainful employment for the last 2 1/2 years, I have to say that I find i peculiar and frustrating that employers expect professionalism from prospective employees without quid pro quo. I understand that in our current economical situation, it may be difficult for employer "wade thru" the numerous resumes in a timely fashion much less respond to them all personally. But I find it very discourteous when an employer invites me for an interview, engages with me for an hour or more, usually ending on what seems a positive note, and then refuses to at least extend me the courtesy of some sort of communication informing me of my status. This negligence comes after I have sent a polite thank you letter or email within 24 hours and waited at least a week before I contact them about my status. In one case I contacted one employer once a week via email for over two months before they finally decided to respond, informing me that budget cuts had eliminated the position. It is my hope that someday employers will hold themselves to the same standards they expect of thos of us who desire to be their employees.

Irked of CA 7:11PM August 24, 2012

After being employed at the same company for twelve years, I was recently laid off, becoming another one of the 'faceless, unworking masses.' I am shocked at how much has changed in the employment culture since then. From the 'convenient' on-line application process (by which I mean a thirty minute odyssey, filling out little boxes with the same information my resume already has), to 'behavioral' interview questions (tell you about my most Zen-like experience??). What I've found to be the most disheartening is how impersonal and just plain rude most potential employers have become. Its hard not to be jaded and defensive. I don't want to waste my time feeling vindictive either - after all, I'm sure they'd forgotten about me as soon as the interview was over. But it does affect my opinion of the companies that treated me this way. Especially the smaller, local businesses. To me, it is almost the same as a bad, unresolved customer experience...

shell shocked of WA 6:15PM July 12, 2012

Couldn't agree more Allison. I am one of those people who email companies to thank them for sending correspondence even if I didn't get the position, simply because it is so rare these days for them to correspond with applicants at all. Thanks for another wonderfully validating article!

Lacey of CO 11:51PM November 15, 2011

On Careers

Find savvy job advice from the brains behind top careers blogs, including Ask a Manager, Lindsay Olson, Keppie Careers, CareerBliss, Kontrary, Jobhuntercoach, Career Sherpa, Eat Your Career, Marty Nemko, Infusive Solutions and Marla Gottschalk.

Jobs That May Interest You

See Jobs Near You

advertisement

Slide Shows

What Will the Job Market Look Like in 2020?

How will the job market look at the end of this decade?

25 Career Mistakes to Banish for 2013

Remove these mistakes from your repertoire.

10 Wardrobe Musts For Your Next Interview

Tips on what clothing items job seekers need.

Latest Video

advertisement