Can You Appeal a Job Rejection?

April 6, 2009 RSS Feed Print

Can you appeal a job rejection? Short answer: No. Well, usually not.

Every few weeks or so, I'm contacted by a job candidate who asks me to reconsider our rejection of his or her application. Here's the internal dialogue in my head when this happens, and I can almost guarantee you it's the same for other hiring managers: "Reconsider the decision? But we rejected you for a specific reason, because you weren't a match with what we're looking for. On what basis are you suggesting we reconsider? Oh, no basis. You just want us to change our minds and decided to take a shot at it. Well, on the off chance that some sort of horrible clerical error happened, let me pull out your resume and make sure. Hmmm, let's see... Yes, the decision was right the first time."

Unfortunately, the reality is that you got rejected for a reason. Maybe your qualifications aren't as strong as you thought they were, or maybe they are very strong but other candidates' are stronger. Or maybe you don't have an accurate understanding of what the job is all about, and therefore your opinion of how qualified you are is built on an erroneous foundation. Whatever it is, you have to remember that the hiring manager knows what she's looking for better than you do.

Because of that, appealing a rejection can come across as saying: "Even though all I know of this job is the one-page job description I read--whereas you know the job, the organization, and the culture intimately--I'm going to reject your judgment and tell you that I know better." You don't want to come across that way.

Some rejected candidates even decide to dispense with me entirely, and instead try to contact the head of my organization to complain about the decision. He immediately forwards them to me--because he trusts me to be competent at my job. Going over the hiring manager's head doesn't endear you to anyone. It's not a good strategy.

All that said, there is one very specific situation where it's OK to appeal a job rejection: when you realize that you have left out pertinent information that might have made a difference. For example: You've just been rejected for a job that requires bookkeeping experience. Your resume doesn't show any, but you've volunteered for years as the treasurer for a local nonprofit, where you're responsible for tracking all the finances and training others in using the bookkeeping software. You didn't think to include it on your resume (although you can and should include volunteer experience, by the way), but now you realize that it might have helped your candidacy. In a case like this, you can send a follow-up email explaining this additional experience and ask if it might change anything. Make sure you explain why you didn't mention it originally.

For tips on how not to get rejected in the first place, see more advice here.

Alison Green is chief of staff for a medium-sized nonprofit where she oversees day-to-day management of the staff as well as hiring, firing, and staff development. She is working with the Management Center to coauthor a book on nonprofit management. Her writings have been published in the Washington Post, the New York Times, Maxim, and dozens of other newspapers. She blogs at Ask a Manager.

Tags:
careers

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I agree with Anonymous. I think that in some cases, employers don't give an accurate representation of the job in the posting.

For example, I had a phone interview a couple of weeks ago for a position at a local corporate office of a national company. They posted the description in what I thought to be clear terms, as well as the qualifications (both required and preferred) for the job. I fit all of them and then some, and from the job description it sounded like it was something I was proficient in doing and something I would want to do.

However, during the phone interview, the interviewer asked me what made me qualified for the position and why they should hire me, first saying that he assumed I knew what the job entailed. So I clearly laid out what made me qualified for the position and why I should be hired. Then the interviewer asked me questions about qualifications that seemed miles away from the position as described - stuff that has nothing to do with my field at all. Then after that he said that the position entailed something totally different than what was described in the posting, and that people who do the kind of work I do in their company (what the job looked like it was for) are in New York City.

On one hand, I'm glad to have been given the heads-up about the company organization and where to apply for jobs relevant to my professional background. I'm also glad that it wasn't an in-person interview.

At the same time, it would be nice if employers were more accurate in their job descriptions. HR should remember that job applicants are oftentimes on the outside looking in, and all we can go on is the description. If it's getting misinterpreted, it's going to hurt the company/department because they may not find the kind of applicant they're looking for, and like you mention Alison, you get lots of applicants that do not understand what the job is about. Accurate communication is important, not only on the applicants' part, but on the employers' part. If you do not properly communicate what the job is about, it's unreasonable to expect for job applicants to read your minds.

Jaye of OH 10:50PM September 14, 2011

"Or maybe you don't have an accurate understanding of what the job is all about, and therefore your opinion of how qualified you are is built on an erroneous foundation."

Upon reading the above, my mind formed a picture of a train grinding to a dreadfully screeching halt. Your applicants don't have "an accurate understanding" of what you are requesting, and are building an "erroneous foundation" in their cover letters and/or resumes? Don't you think that it is a part of your job description to provide an accurate representation of the available position?

It's like putting in an advertisement, "looking for someone with experience making food for a fast-food industry." Someone sends you an application saying they were a God of making hamburgers for Burger King. You reject them because you're looking for someone who's good at making tacos and burritos - perhaps someone who had previously worked at a Taco Bell.

Tl;dr - save everyone's time, including yours, by being accurate about what you are looking for in the first place.

Anonymous 3:36PM August 21, 2011

Hi Alison,

If the unsuccessful candidate achieved a points score over what was the target amount to be offered the job, yet still didn't get offered the job - what then? Do you think there would be grounds for appeal?

On a similar theme, if this candidate was not given a role for a specific reason, for example, lack of experience in a particular field, but another candidate with the same (or lesser) experience was given the same job despite a lower points score - what then?

I like to think I'm not bitter as per some of the other comments here. I would just like to know whether or not there is actually good reason for me to try an appeal because at the same time I wouldn't want to scupper future opportunities which may arise.

AN Other 5:29AM June 13, 2011

On Careers

On Careers

Find savvy job advice from the brains behind top careers blogs, including Ask a Manager, Lindsay Olson, Keppie Careers, Young Entrepreneur Council, CareerBliss and Glassdoor.

Jobs That May Interest You

advertisement

Latest Video

advertisement