Why It's the Thinkers vs. the Action-Takers at Work

August 20, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)

There are times when it seems as if the workplace is divided between people who are prevention-oriented and those who are remedy-oriented.

The “Preventives” are thinkers. They can conjure up a worst case scenario in seconds. They scout out the territory and like to spot the many ways in which some project or action might go wrong. They love flow charts, procedures, and safeguards. They double-check and then check some more. Assurances that all is well make them nervous. Fear is their bedfellow. Risk is their enemy.

[See 15 ways good bosses keep their best employees.]

The “Remedials” prefer action. They are impatient and believe that all plans have some flaws, many of which will only be revealed once the plan is in motion. They are not ashamed of doing repairs while the car is moving because they regard action as preferable to what they believe is paralysis by analysis. They are comfortable with levels of risk that would cause many Preventives to fall into a fetal position.

The Preventives grouse that the Remedials are reckless and sloppy. They dislike any lax attitudes toward rules and procedures and have nightmares about the day when the Remedials generate a scandal or a lawsuit.

[View more career advice at the U.S.News Careers site.]

The Remedials whistle along with an “All’s well that ends well” attitude. They have difficulty understanding why the Preventives get so upset about actions that might not follow every rule or procedure but which get undeniable results.

It is not surprising that many Remedials wind up in executive positions. These are bold decision-makers who know how to get things done quickly. The Preventives, of course, make great staff officers. They can be found in the ranks of attorneys and HR professionals.

A sizable amount of entertainment or frustration can be triggered when the two camps talk past one another. Bridging the gap between the two sides is one of the most important challenges for any organization.

Michael Wade writes Execupundit.com, an eclectic combination of management advice, observations, and links. A partner with the Phoenix firm of Sanders Wade Rodarte Consulting Inc., he has advised private and public-sector organizations for more than 30 years.

Tags:
careers

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I had this great comment written about the "Translator" role (the one that is missing from the article), but the comment gremlins ate it. I'll attempt to rewrite it below...

The role that is missing from the above is the "Translator". This is the person whose job it is to handle communication between the two camps listed in the article. They are the peacemakers on the team, who everyone seems to turn to to "vent" or to ask for advice on how to deal with this person's "wrong" approach. In general, they are the critical "people" people on the team, who keep everyone else from throwing sand at each other.

Because they are good at understanding both sides, they are often chosen to handle communication on behalf of the team to the business units (accounting, sales, merchandising, etc). This is because they have a knack for explaining all sides of things without throwing anyone under any bus, and the project sponsors trust them implicitly.

They often also get pegged to handle writing end user training materials, documenting support processes and generally dealing with the end users because the Project PMs and Developers/Engineers quite simply "can't". It isn't their skill set.

How do I know so much about this role? Because I am a Translator! It's a great role -and I love every minute of it!

AC in Cincy of OH 12:16PM September 10, 2010

My own similar paradigm is extroverts (E) versus introverts (I), and I do have some insight, as I've been both, at least according to my Myers Briggs Type Inventory test scores. E's tend to act and speak without considering, and they don't seem to have much of an inner dialogue. I's, on the other hand, tend to spend more time thinking by themselves, planning things out mentally. I'm more of an I nowadays, although more middling, and I do look at E's as being kind of foolish and stupid, that they don't realize that if they held back and thought a bit, they could be so much more effective in action. At the extreme of I, you might have people over-thinking, but that is actually rare, since there are 3 times more E's, action-takers, that there are I's.

As an middling I, I tend to plan things out, but not to the nth level. I make wire-diagrams of my application designs, scribble notes on paper, and at some point I start building. When problems occur, I'll step back and think out a procedure for analyzing the causes, as well as a an ordered set of steps to solve problems, but even this little bit of I seems exceptional compared to all the flailing about about some E's engage in. As for my negatives, which are positives in the appropriate situation, is evident in the level of excellence I bring to software development, because I think out all sorts of possible bad situations, and then design to handle/avoid such situations; my concern with negatives can seem a 'downer' but it guarantees and excellent product.

james of NY 6:59AM August 26, 2010

Sorry but I am not totally buying this. The theory is too simplistic.

anasue of MO 10:02PM August 22, 2010

On Careers

Find savvy job advice from the brains behind top careers blogs, including Ask a Manager, Lindsay Olson, Keppie Careers, CareerBliss, Kontrary, Jobhuntercoach, Career Sherpa, Eat Your Career, Marty Nemko, Infusive Solutions and Marla Gottschalk.

Jobs That May Interest You

See Jobs Near You

advertisement

Slide Shows

What Will the Job Market Look Like in 2020?

How will the job market look at the end of this decade?

25 Career Mistakes to Banish for 2013

Remove these mistakes from your repertoire.

10 Wardrobe Musts For Your Next Interview

Tips on what clothing items job seekers need.

Latest Video

advertisement