Why Are Companies Sitting on Cash But Not Hiring?

September 7, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (4)

Contrary to public opinion, "companies" are not sitting on cash, nor are "companies" making decisions not to hire you. From now on, whenever you hear someone talk about "companies" doing this or that—or not doing this or that, or acting one way when we all would rather them act another—substitute the word "we" or "us" for "companies."

[See 22 ways to be a better boss.]

Companies do not do anything. People do. And people are making some educated and very rational guesses about the future. In my own little company—fewer than 100 people—our health insurance costs went up nearly 25 percent, and that was the cheapest alternative of many more expensive choices. Our current provider gave us a bid that was up more than 125 percent. "We" would like to hire. But now? Nope.

Another thing: "Companies" do not fire people. "We" fire people and it is incredibly hard and sad to do. So, it is human nature to make sure there is enough business ahead of us so we do not have to fire people again.

[See how to beat the job search blues.]

Luckily, however, there is some good news on the horizon. I see that the Department of Labor has decided to create their very own job board. (See Huffington Post article.) After all, there are only about 75,000 existing job boards out there right now, serving employers and job seekers in every state, city, and industry niche. (Disclosure: my company is LinkUp.com, a job search engine for jobs found on company websites.)

Just be glad that the government did not decide to get into the clothing store business. After all, I sometimes have problems finding the right size.

G. L. Hoffman is a serial entrepreneur and venture investor/operator/incubator/mentor. Two of his companies have traveled the entire success path from the garage to IPO. Currently, he is chairman of JobDig, which operates LinkUp, one of the fastest-growing job-search engines. His blog can be found at WhatWouldDadSay.com.

Tags:
careers

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Why are companies sitting on 1.6 trillion of cash?

Ask John Galt!

If the Republicans take over both houses of congress then John will signal the end of the strike!

edge.

edge of NJ 11:37AM October 04, 2010

You could just as easily hire part-timers to fulfill the needs that one full-time employee would meet. Let them know there's no promises or guarantees, and they can tailor their schedule to attend other job interviews if they so wish (or set up their own practice as contractors and get new clients).

That would make some sense.

Anonymous of FL 1:50PM September 10, 2010

people do.

Same argument

Alan Karls of CA 12:33PM September 08, 2010

On Careers

Find savvy job advice from the brains behind top careers blogs, including Ask a Manager, Lindsay Olson, Keppie Careers, CareerBliss, Kontrary, Jobhuntercoach, Career Sherpa, Eat Your Career, Marty Nemko, Infusive Solutions and Marla Gottschalk.

Jobs That May Interest You

See Jobs Near You

advertisement

Slide Shows

What Will the Job Market Look Like in 2020?

How will the job market look at the end of this decade?

25 Career Mistakes to Banish for 2013

Remove these mistakes from your repertoire.

10 Wardrobe Musts For Your Next Interview

Tips on what clothing items job seekers need.

Latest Video

advertisement