Keeping Older Workers on the Job

July 17, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (12)

Companies that fear a shortage of qualified workers are trying to entice older workers to stay on the job longer. The Los Angeles-based defense and technology corporation Northrop Grumman is exploring innovative ways to keep baby boomers at their desks and get them to teach younger workers their vital skills. I recently spoke with Ian Ziskin, chief human resources and administrative officer for Northrop Grumman, about how he balances new hires with older worker retention. Excerpts:

How much of your workforce is planning to retire in the next decade?
If you look at the demographics of the workforce for Northrop Grumman, which are pretty consistent with the demographics of the aerospace and defense industry in general, we have about 122,000 employees, approximately 50 percent of whom are going to be able to retire over the next five to 10 years.

Why do you want older workers to continue to work longer?
This company is moving into a mode where we want to encourage more people to stay if it fits with their life plan. We're in a situation where it's beneficial for employees who wish to stay longer, and it's beneficial to the company to make them want to stay, assuming they have the right skills. The number of people qualified to fill engineering and technical positions that require a good, strong background in engineering and mathematics is a shrinking population of people that many companies are competing for.

Are you having difficulty finding enough qualified workers to replace the employees who are retiring?
We hire quite a few new people each year. We've had a lot of success hiring really good people, but it's always a challenge. The number of people who are coming out of school with the required math and science skills that we need in order to do the kind of work we do is shrinking. One of the challenges that Northrop Grumman and the aerospace and defense industry have is we generally require security clearance, which by definition means that they have to be U.S. citizens.

It is better for the company to retain older workers or hire younger and cheaper people?
Like any company, you always have to have the appropriate balance with those who are coming in brand new. The people who are at the later part of their career certainly have the more in-depth technology knowledge that we need to serve customers. We're going to continue to hire new people into the company. We tend to hire somewhere between 14,000 and 15,000 new people every year, and that's going to continue.

Are there any programs in place to facilitate the transfer of knowledge between older and younger workers?
There's an opportunity to retain some of those workers longer who might have an interest in doing so and transfer knowledge to others behind them. We've asked those near retirement to help coach and mentor others who are coming behind them. Those programs—while effective where they exist, there aren't enough of them. Our plans over the next few years are to expand them.

What incentives to keep older workers are you likely to implement?
What I think you will see going forward is making sure that the work assignment that we're asking our more senior people to take on continues to be very challenging and also asking them to take on more mentoring and coaching knowledge transfer roles, which, in some cases, they can do directly in the jobs that they are in. There will be more flexible work practices with regard to scheduling. People might work from home occasionally, work a part-time schedule, or work a schedule that is a little bit more concise as they ease their way into retirement.

What types of retirement questions do employees most often ask HR about?
First and foremost, the question they ask is, "Can I really afford to retire?" which is not a question that we [can] answer. What we do is provide them with the information they need about their anticipated pensions and payments and other information related to the retirement process or direct to them to a financial adviser to help them decide when they might be comfortable retiring. The other types of questions they come to us with have a lot more to do with the process of deciding what they are going to do with their time when they do retire, which is one of the things that leads me to believe we could put their talents and skills to good use.

What advice do you have for a baby boomer who wants to work longer?
Make your aspirations to stay known if you are interested in continuing to work. Help companies like Northrop Grumman and others understand what is important to you in terms of challenging work and more flexible workplace preferences that would make you want to continue to work.

Tags:
Northrop Grumman,
careers,
retirement

Reader Comments Read all comments (12)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Ian, our HR guy is gone.

Aerospace Systems of Northrop has targeted employees 50+ age.

The government will pay a heavy price and Wes Bush could care less.

This CEO is all for maximizing his wealth by taking away pay and benefits.

Northrop Grumman is is not a Technology company like the previous TRW but solely

an airplane company.

Northrop Grumman bought TRW to raid tpark to get one last buck before he dumps us.park he pension plan.

They are destroying their future and will soon pay for it in 2013.

Business is in a rapid deterioration mode.

Within 3-5 years Wes Bush will sell Space Park and run to the bank laughing all the way,

with no oversight from others and on the back of the taxpayers.

He is the highest paid CEO out there when his company profits are shrinking.

From a real insider at this place

Engineer of CA 9:26AM March 08, 2012

Give please. If God had wanted us to vote, he would have given us candidates.

I am from Guinea and also now teach English, please tell me right I wrote the following sentence: "With that in mind, discovering how to pass a drug test will probably be useful to you in the future."

Thanks 8-). Nikki.

Nikki of DC 2:30PM February 15, 2009

I am no engineer, but I am a Boomer who has seen the "downside" of how companies maneuver older workers out the door and off their pensions....regardless of the decades of loyal and exemplary service. It's sad that a person can give 20+ years to a company and then get hustled out the door without so much as a "thank you".

It has been my experience that 'sharing knowledge' with the younger worker can also have "negative consequences". If the older worker mentors a younger worker, the elder is put in a vulnerable position by being "encouraged" to pass on their expertise to retain their "usefulness", and simultaneously rendering themselves obsolete once the "transfer of knowledge" runs it's course. Many older workers have been "pushed out" whether they were ready to retire or not...

The new "norm" is for an employee to change companies every few years, or risk their skills becoming obsolete. Many younger workers have "milked" their mentors dry then promoted their own position by rendering their mentor obsolete. That is the downside of mentoring....

and shows that bottom line profits are more important to any company than any employee, regardless of decades of loyalty and service.

T of CA 1:39PM August 18, 2008

Planning to Retire

Senior editor Emily Brandon tells you how to get ready financially for retirement and to make your golden years the best they can be.

advertisement

Our retirement readiness calculator will provide a rough idea of how long your retirement savings and income will last.


advertisement