Cracking Into Your Nest Egg Early

July 24, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (7)

Most people who diligently tuck money into a 401(k) know that those dollars are intended for retirement. But many 401(k)'s have provisions that allow workers to take loans when necessary. And economically squeezed workers are increasingly raiding their retirement plans to make ends meet.

Here's how 401(k) loans work. If your 401(k) plan allows loans, you can borrow $50,000 or one half of the vested balance from your retirement account, whichever is lower. Any loan has to be repaid within five years, except for loans taken out by first-time homeowners who get up to 15 years to repay.

If you don't make payments, the outstanding loan amount is considered a taxable distribution from the 401(k), and if you're younger than 591/2, you'll also get hit with a 10 percent penalty. "If you miss a loan payment, you hurt your credit rating. If you miss a payment on a 401(k) loan, it is considered to be in default," warns Michael Kresh, a certified financial planner in Islandia, N.Y. "Under many plans, a defaulted loan is considered a taxable distribution, and it will immediately trigger an income tax on the total amount of the loan." (My Money Blog has an interesting discussion going about how 401(k) loan repayment can affect taxes.)

The average loan amount grew by 61 percent from $4,912 in 1995 to $7,932 in 2004, according to a recent report by the Center for American Progress think tank. While 401(k) loans help workers in the short term, many workers don't save—or save less—during repayment than they otherwise would have. And that hurts retirement security for the future. A worker who takes a fairly modest loan of $5,000 in 2008 dollars and makes only loan payments during repayment reduces his total retirement savings between 13 and 22 percent, CAP calculated.

It also helps if a worker can continue to make regular contributions to the 401(k) while repaying the loan. But for the workers who take out loans because of a spell of unemployment, bad health, or to purchase a home, it may be unrealistic to think that families can make their original contributions while also repaying the loan, Christian Weller and Jeffrey Wenger, the authors of the CAP report, write.

The Pension Rights Center in Washington, D.C., is advocating a zero tolerance for preretirement access to 401(k) accounts. "While this might mean that some employees would not contribute quite as much to their 401(k) plans, it would also mean that what they did contribute would be there for retirement," the center says in a statement for the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging, which held a hearing on reducing 401(k) losses caused by loans and withdrawals last week.

Tell us, would you contribute to a 401(k) knowing you could not get the money for any reason until retirement?

Tags:
401(k),
personal finance,
retirement

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

This is just a ridiculous piece of rubbish. Borrowing from your 401K has an opportunity cost that isn't mentioned...

Josea Samuels, CPA of ID 1:20PM April 30, 2009

I disagree regarding getting taxed twice. You're forgetting that you never got, nor ever will get, taxed on the 401(K) loan amount you took out. Think of it this way > if you took out a $10K loan (which is untaxed $) & immediately repaid it w/ the $10K you just took out then you would never have paid w/ taxed money (your salary). That $10K, now safely back in the 401K, would get taxed whenever down the road you decide to withdraw. If you think of re-paying the $10K w/ "separate" income you make (ie., taxed dollars) then, yes, that money will be taxed twice. But you're forgetting the $10K you took out which will never get taxed. The only double-tax I see is on the interest you pay on the 401(K) loan.

ben of NH 3:25PM March 30, 2009

I would welcome comment on the following:

What if the 401k lost and is losing money and one has credit card debt running at anything from 4.8% to 29%pa on amounts for instance of say 4k to 30k? Or if one is going or nearly going into foreclosure on ones prime home? What is the sense considering to almost 'bankrupt' oneself in order to bleed -6%pa?

Many people have lost the equivalent amount that could have paid down considerable amounts of the credit card debt but what's done is done why should they be penalized in making an effort to become financially stable with a home by using some or all of their 401k. Let's say this 401k is with an old employer and not the current one which contributions to the max are being made.

What other investments can be made with an IRA and not a 401k, ie can one buy land, or resl estate and just 'sit on it' until retirement or infact us real estate buying and selling for the IRA investment instead of mutual funds? How can one reconcile ones debt situation with ones retirement and tax situation today?

simmons of NC 12:36PM March 17, 2009

Planning to Retire

Senior editor Emily Brandon tells you how to get ready financially for retirement and to make your golden years the best they can be.

advertisement

Our retirement readiness calculator will provide a rough idea of how long your retirement savings and income will last.


advertisement