Republicans Are More Confident About Retirement Than Democrats and Independents

October 22, 2008 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)

Roberta Tim Quan, 74, a retired elementary school educator in San Pablo, Calif., recently sustained a loss of $38,000 in her 403(b) retirement account. "My situation is in shambles, with expenses exceeding income," she said at a congressional hearing about retirement security this morning. "I am retired and unable to re-earn the lost funds."

Quan, like many retirees who have experienced catastrophic losses in their retirement accounts, is looking for the government to provide some answers. But how the government should address the retirement needs of retirees who suffered market losses is hotly debated.

Fully funding Social Security in its current form to ensure that Americans receive their guaranteed benefits is a desired government response for 57 percent of Americans, according to a Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies survey of 3,258 Americans ages 18 and up in early September. But other ideas to ease the burdens of retirement planning vary widely, and none was overwhelmingly supported by a majority of the survey respondents. Here's a look at some other roles survey respondents suggested the president and Congress should play in retirement planning.

The top priorities the new president and Congress should focus on to help Americans achieve a financially secure retirement:

  • Fully fund Social Security in its current form to ensure Americans receive their guaranteed benefits (57 percent)
  • Implement a financial literacy curriculum in the schools (34 percent)
  • Encourage 401(k) plans to offer to pay benefits in a form that guarantees retirees a set level of monthly income, regardless of how long they live (28 percent)
  • Provide tax credits to workers earning up to $50,000 of annual income who make contributions to an IRA, 401(k), or 403(b) plan (26 percent)
  • Provide incentives for the purchase of long-term care insurance (24 percent)
  • Ensure that all workers have the ability to contribute to a 401(k) or other retirement plan (21 percent)
  • Ensure that all workers not covered by a 401(k) or similar plan have the ability to make regular IRA contributions at the workplace through payroll deduction (20 percent)
  • Privatize Social Security by creating individual savings accounts (18 percent)
  • Encourage financial education at the workplace through employer incentives and other reforms (15 percent)
  • Other (18 percent)

Source: Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies, 2008.

"It should be noted that the survey was fielded several weeks ago, before the historic storm that has struck the financial markets," says Catherine Collinson, president of the nonprofit Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies. "Since then, Americans are without a doubt even less confident and have increased their expectations of the next president and Congress to address their concerns."

A correlation emerged in the survey between political party affiliation and retirement confidence. More than half of Democrats (53 percent) and 48 percent of independents feel less confident in their ability to achieve a financially secure retirement than they did 12 months ago, compared with only 34 percent of Republicans. But backers of both parties listed preserving Social Security in its current form as a top priority. Some 65 percent of Democrats believe the administration should fully fund Social Security and ensure Americans receive their guaranteed benefits, compared with 49 percent of Republicans and 58 percent of independents. Conversely, 31 percent of Republicans are open to the privatization of Social Security by creating individual savings accounts, compared with 10 percent of Democrats and 16 percent of independents.

Overall, Republicans view their retirement prospects as slightly rosier than Democrats see theirs, according to the survey. Some 63 percent of Republicans expressed confidence in their ability to retire comfortably, compared with 52 percent of Democrats and 54 percent of independents.

Here's a look at Barack Obama's and John McCain's plans for your retirement accounts.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
retirement,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The example of the retired school teacher, Mrs.Quan brings out another huge problem for all California educators that retire from the State Teachers Retirement System. Even if teachers retire with Social Security benefits, the Government Pension Offset and Windfall Elimination Provision are two provisions of federal law that reduce the amount of Social Security benefits, spousal benefits, or survivor benefits a person can receive if he/she is also receiving a public pension.

This inequity not only potentially hurts Mrs.Quan but greatly impacts the recruitment of new teachers at a time of qualified teacher shortages. FOR EXAMPLE: A person works for 15 years as an accountant and contributes to social security. That person then goes into teaching and works for 15 years, contributing to the State Teachers' Retirement System. When that person retires from teaching, after a total of 30 years of work, he or she loses all social security benefits for which he or she had paid for 15 years! And if the person's spouse was a social security payer and predeceased our teacher, any social security spousal benefit which the teacher would have been entitled to ends when the teacher retires!

Depressing when you consider the we are using the federal bail billions to bail out of the same jerks whose greed that caused much of our current financial fiasco.

Bob of CA 7:37PM October 25, 2008

It is no secret that the social security fund has been systematically robbed by members of both parties in congress with the approval of presidents of both parties for years.

So, insstead of growing with even just minimum interest, it has become perilous for the future because what was "borrowed" was not replaced with or without minimum interest.

It is a government guaranteed promise to all that have participated and played by the rules. It is the government that has not.

People can have all kinds of savings and/or investment accounts they please. But that should not take away from nor replace the government guaranteed program that the government has mismanaged.

The "borrowers" should bring spending on all sorts of things including prolonged wars of choice long after the tyrants regime has been overthrown and bring spending under control instead of forfeiting on their promise to the people that contributed and played by the rules.

HillbillyBill of TN 7:27AM October 23, 2008

Planning to Retire

Senior editor Emily Brandon tells you how to get ready financially for retirement and to make your golden years the best they can be.

advertisement

Our retirement readiness calculator will provide a rough idea of how long your retirement savings and income will last.


advertisement