Your 401(k) May Be Making Someone Else a Millionaire

April 10, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)

Starting to save for retirement in your 20s and continuing throughout your life can make even modest earners millionaires. But you may also be making someone else a millionaire in the process.

A 25-year-old couple with a combined income of $75,000 who together saved $5,000 annually in a 401(k) with a $2,000 employer match, would accumulate almost $2.5 million after 40 years in the workforce, assuming an annual 7.5 percent return, according to calculations by David Loeper, president and CEO of Wealthcare Capital Management and author of the new book Stop the Retirement Rip-off: How to Avoid Hidden Fees and Keep More of Your Money. A financial services company charging 1.5 percent worth of fees to that account would make $ 1,033,880 over the same time period, Loeper calculated.

Even small fees erode your nest egg over time. An annual fee of just half a percent of the account balance over a 30-year career can reduce purchasing power in retirement by one-eighth, according to recent calculations by the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.

It seems obvious that retirement savers should try to minimize fees as much as possible, but this is far from a simple task. Most 401(k) plans have a limited number of investment choices, and sometimes it requires scrutinizing the fine print to spot all the fees charged. “Expense ratios are not transparent and people aren’t aware of these fees,” says Loeper. Perhaps retirement savers are able to overlook 1.5 percent fees during bull markets, but in a year of double digit 401(k) losses, fees only further diminish your account balance. Loeper says a reasonable expense ratio is 0.75 percent of the account balance or less. “That should be the absolute maximum,” he says.

Tags:
retirement

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

WOW! How enlightening!

Taking this thought out a little further, just think how much I could save if I never went to the dentist. Take that money and invest it at 7.5%, or better yet, never have my car serviced, or not having kids, so I don't have any doctor's hospital bills.

There is no free lunch. These authors LOVE to work people up on fees on their investments. If we'd see their accounts, they are no doubt paying these fees. Shut Up already.

Alan Bond of CO 8:36AM April 14, 2009

yes it costs to save, no one is going to give it to you for free

in the above example there is before tax savings (will that be a benefit in the future? who knows) an employer match and positive earnings

also in the example (I agree with the others, 1.5% in fees does not come out what is indicated)what would it cost the same person to buy that kind of savings outside of the employer, on their own, with limited before tax savings, no match, etc.

again nothing is free, and 401k's were suppose to be a part of retirement savings, along with ss and personal savings

if someone finds a free one, let me know!

Leann Green of OH 11:16AM April 13, 2009

but $500K is still high.

Now, boys and girls, imagine how much worse off we'd be if we "privatized" Social Security so that someone could "manage" that pot of money too.

Yes, I know somebody will come along and say that if social security was in private accounts that the government could not "borrow" and spend it elsewhere. But,

the market can certainly borrow and lose it elsewhere (to traders)---as you just saw happen to the 401(k) accounts.

Muser of NM 11:27AM April 11, 2009

Planning to Retire

Senior editor Emily Brandon tells you how to get ready financially for retirement and to make your golden years the best they can be.

advertisement

Our retirement readiness calculator will provide a rough idea of how long your retirement savings and income will last.


advertisement