Retirees Become More Conservative, Frugal

July 16, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (4)

Baby boomers still in the work force have some time left to boost their nest eggs. But people who retired before the recession began have less hope for recovering diminished retirement funds. Almost half of retirees (49 percent) are feeling less financially secure than when they first retired, according to a new survey. When these same 1,011 retirees ages 55 to 75 with $100,000 or more in household investable assets were interviewed in February 2008, 20 percent had less confidence in their financial prospects than they did when they first retired. Only one in four of these relatively affluent retirees are very confident they have saved enough for retirement, a 12 percentage point drop from last year.

To cope, many of the retirees are now seeking safety in their investments. The proportion of retirees describing themselves as conservative investors increased from 53 percent in 2008 to 70 percent in April 2009, the study by the Society of Actuaries, International Foundation for Retirement Education, and LIMRA, an association of insurance and financial services companies, found. While only 12 percent of the retirees considered themselves aggressive investors in 2008, that number has since dropped to 7 percent. About a quarter of the retirees now say they are evenly balanced. The retirees that changed their risk tolerance say it was due to concerns about the economy (79 percent), inflation (45 percent), not enough time to recover from the downturn (39 percent), and the value of their house changed (28 percent). A few of the retirees also sought out a financial adviser to assist in growing their assets. About 61 percent of the retirees surveyed have a personal financial adviser, up from 56 percent last year.

In addition to tweaking their investment strategy, many of the retirees have also become more frugal since 2008. Only 22 percent of the retirees now spend whatever they want compared to 38 percent in 2008. Most of the retirees (71 percent) now describe themselves as having enough money to cover basic needs and some extras. There was a modest increase in those who are now on a strict budget from 4 percent in 2008 to 7 percent this year. Slightly less than half of the retirees reported not receiving enough income from Social Security and traditional pension plans to cover their basic living expenses without using their savings in both 2008 and 2009.

Tags:
retirement

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Muser apparently likes to get 7-8% mortgages and high taxes to produce a grest US economy. The tax and spend ( in reverse order) mentality is a primary reason we, personally and collectively, as a nation got ourselves in the economic fix we now have. Blaming Republicans, seemingly makes some folks feel good, but overlooks the real cause of economic strife: personal economic responsibility.

Bob M.

Bob Marks of MT 7:48PM July 22, 2009

Since when are retirees with $100,000 in investable assets considered "relatively affluent"? If you apply the standard formula of withdrawing no more than 4% a year from your assets to avoid outliving your savings, a retiree with merely $100,000 would have a whopping $4,000 a year income to live off. It's no wonder they might feel insecure about their retirement! Anyone writing about retirement needs to understand the realities associated with the actual costs involved. While $100,000 might seem like a lot of money to a younger saver, the reality is that even $1,000,000 yields only $40,000 a year at 4%. Given that only Government workers and teachers get defined benefit pensions any more, $40,000 plus social security income results in a pretty tight budget for most couples.

Frank of MA 2:25PM July 22, 2009

Interesting article, but what does it mean for those still in the work force? Truth is, most already retired are benefiting from both social security and a traditional pension. A traditional pension plan being one that comes with the guarantee of a certain amount of earnings or a percentage of the retirees last salary? I don't call market based pension plans traditional, instead they are creating a retired working class that must work to make ends meet. Often working well into their 80's or 90's with major health ailments and all. I saw a man that had to be in his 80's pushing shopping carts at a supermarket. I watched him for about ten minutes and noticed that he could only push about two carts at a time and it took him forever to get them out of the lot before he shuffled back for two more. I don't think he does it just to keep busy or fit. He's working because he has to, and this will become reality for most of the working class, unfortunately.

Niche Who?

www.nichewho.com

Niche Who? www.nichewho.com of NJ 10:44AM July 17, 2009

Planning to Retire

Senior editor Emily Brandon tells you how to get ready financially for retirement and to make your golden years the best they can be.

advertisement

Our retirement readiness calculator will provide a rough idea of how long your retirement savings and income will last.


advertisement