Financial Security and Flexibility in a Retirement Plan?

September 1, 2009 RSS Feed Print

Most workers who save for retirement do so through their workplace retirement plan. Some 61 percent of employees view their company’s retirement program as the primary vehicle to save for retirement, and 29 percent of workers say they would not save for retirement without it, according to a Watson Wyatt survey of  2,232 full-time workers released today. These are the features employees say they want from their workplace retirement plan.

A pension. More employees with a traditional pension (62 percent) are satisfied with their retirement program than those with only a 401(k) or similar retirement plan (51 percent). More than half of workers with a traditional pension (52 percent) say their company’s retirement program is a key reason they continue to work for their employer, compared with one third of those with only a 401(k) plan. Workers with a pension are also more likely to want to stay with their employer until retirement (67 percent) than those with only a 401(k) (54 percent).

Flexibility. But many workers want more flexibility than most traditional pensions offer. Half of current full-time workers prefer to have the freedom to make their own investment decisions and are willing to accept investment risks for an opportunity to earn higher returns. And 53 percent of employees would like to be able to take their retirement plan with them when they change jobs.

Guaranteed retirement income. Yet, a significant portion of employees are searching for some additional investment protections, and are even willing to accept lower returns in exchange for them. A quarter of workers would prefer an investment option that offers a guaranteed benefit amount with no opportunity for higher returns and no chance of lower returns. Many employees (39 percent) would also like the option to have their retirement benefits distributed as guaranteed monthly payments for the rest of their life instead of as a lump sum. Younger workers (61 percent) in the survey were especially concerned about their future retirement benefits being reduced or eliminated.

Retiree health insurance. Retiring before you qualify for Medicare at age 65 can mean expensive health insurance premiums, copays, and deductables or even being denied coverage. Almost half (46 percent) of workers would be willing to pay a higher amount out of their paychecks throughout their working life to ensure they have guaranteed medical benefits in retirement and 40 percent would be willing to pay for retiree medical coverage if they retire before age 65.

Tags:
retirement

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

It's not that policemen and firemen haven't earned security through hard work. It's that mechanics, factory workers, farmers, construction people and all kinds of others have likewise earned security but don't have it BECAUSE they depend on corporations and you depend on government.

Certain classes of workers are "overdone" with benefits. Others are way "underdone".

Some of us would like that playing field leveled. Only legislation can do that.

Muser of NM 9:56AM September 02, 2009

To "Tough Love of NJ" You really don't have a clue. Police and Firefighters deserve the pensions that they work for. Firefighters and Police Officers contribute to their pensions each and every payday. They also pay their taxes and mortgages just like all working people. So you can imagine my ire when you call Policemen and Firefighters "parasites". We have our pensions because we "DESERVE" them and have earned "THEM". How dare you slam public servants who have and will lay down their very lives to protect you and your family. You obviously have never needed to call for help. Your problem is that you are envious. I can't believe that you honestly feel that CURRENT pensions that Policemen and Firefighter's have EARNED should be ended or reduced.

Mitch Parnell of OK 6:09AM September 02, 2009

The fisrt commentor had it right.

But let me add ..... Taxpayers are getting quite the shaft in funding EXTRAORDINARILY generous Pensions & retiree healthcare for Civil Servants (& especially cops & fireman). At retirement, the "value" of the TYPICAL civil Servant's pension & benefits is 3 times that of a similarly situated (in pay, years of service, and age at retirement) Private Sector worker. For Cops & Firemen, its SIX times.

It's long past time to end this and REDUCE these Pensions & Benefits for CURRENT (now just new ) Civil Servants.

Their GREED had turned them into parasites on the back of taxpayers.

Tough Love of NJ 10:23PM September 01, 2009

Planning to Retire

Planning to Retire

Associate editor Emily Brandon tells you how to get ready financially for retirement and to make your golden years the best they can be.

advertisement

EASY RETIREMENT CALCULATOR

Our retirement readiness calculator will provide a rough idea of how long your retirement savings and income will last.


Latest Video

advertisement