Bill Proposes Tougher Penalties for Scamming Older Investors

September 11, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)

Legislation introduced in the House and Senate yesterday would enact harsher penalties against people who commit securities violations against senior citizens. Under the proposed Senior Investor Protections Enhancement Act, each infringement targeted toward an investor age 62 or older would carry an extra $50,000 civil fine in additional to the normal penalties. Violations could include selling products unsuitable for the older investor’s age, failing to disclose fees, charging large penalty fees, or giving the customer a different investment product than the one that was marketed.

“Certain unscrupulous financial advisers have already taken enough from hardworking Americans. It is despicable to think of them preying on our seniors by selling them investment products they don’t need, charging them large penalty fees, or otherwise taking advantage of them,” says Congresswoman Gwen Moore, a Wisconsin democrat who cosponsored the bill in the house. “These two pieces of legislation will help ensure that only legitimate financial advisers are selling products to seniors and will punish those who take advantage of them.”

[See Finding a Financial Adviser You Can Trust.]

A second bill, the Senior Investor Protection Act, creates a grant program for states to encourage state regulators to adopt a uniform standard for the accreditation of financial advisers and educate seniors about various financial adviser credentials. States could use the funds to hire additional staff to investigate and prosecute senior investor fraud cases, fund new technology, equipment, and training for regulators, prosecutors, and law enforcement, and to provide educational materials about various financial adviser designations.

[Find out if $1 Million is Enough to Retire.]

“Seniors should be able to trust the people who invest their money,” says Senator Herb Kohl, a Wisconsin democrat and chairman of the Special Committee on Aging. “They should not be worried that the title after their advisor’s name is scarcely more than a marketing ploy, and that it was not earned through sufficiently rigorous financial education or training.”

Tell us, would these 2 bills help protect senior citizen inventors from fraud?

Tags:
retirement

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

are not as important as whether investments are appropriate for specific investors. Remember, over-zealous "credentialing" and "licensing" are too often advocated and used by SOME to stifle the competition from others.

Also, fines to government are never as important as restitution to victims.

So, I don't KNOW whether these bills are the best they could be or not.

Muser of NM 4:15PM September 11, 2009

Fraud becomes a less punishable crime because the victim may be younger? If a behavior warrants a penalty, give it one. Fraud is fraud. I don't see why the age of your victim should make it more or less of a crime.

chronic.individuality of SC 3:23PM September 11, 2009

Planning to Retire

Senior editor Emily Brandon tells you how to get ready financially for retirement and to make your golden years the best they can be.

advertisement

Our retirement readiness calculator will provide a rough idea of how long your retirement savings and income will last.


advertisement