No Social Security Increase in 2010

October 15, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (41)

Retirees will not receive a Social Security cost-of-living increase in 2010, the Social Security Administration announced today. This will be the first year without a boost in Social Security payments since automatic increases for inflation went into effect in 1975.

Social Security payments are currently tied to the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, which did not increase between the third quarter for 2008 and 2009. Existing Social Security recipients will receive the same amount as last year, under current law. “Last year when consumer prices spiked, largely as a result of higher gas prices, beneficiaries received a 5.8 percent cost-of-living adjustment, the largest increase since 1982,” says Michael Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security. “Social Security is doing its job helping Americans maintain their standard of living.” The maximum amount of earnings subject to the Social Security tax will also remain at $106,800.

[See 6 Ways to Maximize Your Social Security Payout.]

To counteract the stagnant retirement benefits, President Obama announced his support for a one-time $250 payment for seniors, veterans, and people with disabilities yesterday. Under the proposal, checks would be mailed to 49 million Social Security beneficiaries, 5 million Supplemental Security Income recipients, 2 million veterans, 500 thousand railroad retirement and disability beneficiaries, and about 1 million public-employee retirees. The amount is equivalent to a 2 percent increase in benefits for the average Social Security recipient and would cost $13 billion. Only one payment would be allowed per person.

The measure would extend for an additional year a provision of the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act which distributed $250 economic recovery payments to seniors in May 2009 at a cost of $13.7 billion. “These payments will provide aid to more than 50 million people in the coming year, relief that will not only make a difference for them, but for our economy as a whole, complementing the tax cuts we’ve provided working families and small businesses through the Recovery Act," says Obama in a statement. "This additional assistance will be especially important in the coming months, as countless seniors and others have seen their retirement accounts and home values decline as a result of this economic crisis.” Obama's proposal is similar to several bills currently being considered by Congress.

[See New Bills Aim to Boost Social Security Checks.]

The earnings limit for Social Security recipients who are younger than their full retirement age (age 66 for people born in 1943 through 1954) will remain $14,160 in 2010. After that amount, 50 cents of each dollar earned is temporarily withheld from Social Security checks. For Social Security recipients turning 66 in 2010, the earnings cap is raised to $37,680 between January and the month the worker turns 66. Workers who earn more than that will have 33 cents of each dollar temporarily deducted from Social Security payments. Once beneficiaries reach their full retirement age there are no penalties for continuing to work while claiming Social Security. Employees who had some or all of their Social Security payments withheld due to earnings may have their benefits recalculated to a higher amount when they reach their full retirement age to reflect their increased lifetime earnings.

Tags:
retirement

Reader Comments Read all comments (41)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I became disabled and totally unable to work; and therefore, I qualified for SSI in December 2011. I was told that the Federal government (Obama & the Democrates in power) capped SSI to $715 in December 2009 to where no one can receive more that $715 a month, no matter how much they have put into their social security accounts. How does anyone live off of $715 a month? I was awarded only $180 from the Federal government and I'm very concerned I will lose my home. I cannot live off of this small amount and I don't have any family support or anyway to provide for myself. I had to cash out my retirement which was very small;and now I literally have nothing else to live off of.

angie of CO 8:18PM February 13, 2012

I just don't get it: why can't the Presiden, the Senate, and Congress forego their salaries for just one month to see how is to live like Joe Q Citizen? Rather than fly First Class they should fly Commercial, except for the jerk running this Country due to so much Security. But just once I'd love to have those in power see how it really is to live on a fixed income, struggle to pay for the necessities of life, etc. Simply put they just damned sure couldn't do it.

Bj Howell of AL 11:56PM October 11, 2010

Who gave the government permission to use SOCIAL SECURITY ON OTHER PROGRAMS? We have paid into most of our lives, SOCIAL SECURITY was set up for that purposes and was not to be used for anything else. Now their saying we are running out of money and therefore our children will not have social security .

I know for a fact that if a person comes to the united state and are 65 they can collect social security and have not worked a day in the united state.I think that befor the government ask for a rate in creases in pay.The better look at reelection time.

I dear all government officials try living on $400 a month or even $1000 a month for one year.A NOT IN THEIR HOMES! GO OUT AND RENT A PLACE ON WHAT MOST REGULAR GET FROM SOCIAL SECURITY AND PAY UTILITIE, FOOD, MEDICATION, GAS,INSURANCE, ECT.

Anita Casey of OR 3:00PM August 17, 2010

Planning to Retire

Senior editor Emily Brandon tells you how to get ready financially for retirement and to make your golden years the best they can be.

advertisement

Our retirement readiness calculator will provide a rough idea of how long your retirement savings and income will last.


advertisement