Private Sector Jobs With the Best Retirement Benefits

November 3, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

Private sector companies have steadily provided less retirement benefits to workers over the past decade. The value of retirement plans for employees, including traditional pensions, 401(k)s, retiree medical insurance, and post-retirement life insurance, dropped from 7.8 percent of pay in 2002 to 6.9 percent of pay in 2008, according to a Watson Wyatt analysis of 183 medium and large private sector employers over the 7-year period. About half of the decline is due to the elimination of retiree health plans at most companies. The shift from traditional pensions to 401(k)s also eroded the total value of retirement benefits.

For companies that eliminated a traditional pension and now provide only a 401(k), total retirement benefits dropped from 8.7 percent of pay in 2002 to 5.5 percent of pay in 2008. Many of these companies increased their 401(k) contributions when the pension plan was eliminated, by an average of 2.7 percentage points, but this gain covered only about half of the value employees lost when their pension plan was frozen or closed.

"The tumult of the last decade, with its market bubbles and crashes, two recessions, rising healthcare expenses, and compensation pressures, has caused employers to scramble to look for savings," says Jim Shaddy, North America retirement practice director at Watson Wyatt. "As a result, a number of employers have pushed some of the risk and cost in their retirement plans onto employees' shoulders."

Employers that provided only a 401(k) or similar retirement plan for the past 7 years actually increased retirement benefits slightly from 5.3 percent of pay in 2002 to 5.6 percent of pay in 2008, due to higher employer contributions to 401(k)s. Companies that maintained traditional pension plans throughout this period reduced the value of overall retirement benefits from 9.4 percent to 8.6 percent of pay, largely due to a significant cut in retiree health benefits. The employers also lowered the value of retirement benefits by converting to hybrid pension plans, reducing benefit accrual rates, trimming early retirement subsidies, and eliminating supplemental benefits.

A related Watson Wyatt analysis of 600 companies found that the highly profitable pharmaceutical and energy industries tend to provide significantly more generous retirement benefits than the retail and construction industries. But almost all sectors somehow cut retirement payouts over the past decade. Only one industry, the growing healthcare sector, gave even a slight increase in retirement benefits to workers. Here’s a look which jobs provide the most retirement benefits and how their value has changed since 1998.

Retirement Benefits as a Percentage of Pay in 2008

(Percent change from 1998 to 2008 is in parenthesis.)

  • Chemicals, drugs and pharmaceuticals 12.41 percent (-1 percent)
  • Energy and natural resources 10.66 percent (-12 percent)
  • Gas, electric, and water 10.28 percent (-23 percent)
  • Finance 7.54 percent (-17 percent)
  • Health Care 6.94 percent (.29 percent)
  • Communications and telecom services 6.60 percent (-31 percent)
  • Manufacturing 6.39 percent (-41 percent)
  • High-tech 6.09 percent (-24 percent)
  • Transportation 5.97 percent (-36 percent)
  • Construction 4.82 percent (-28 percent)
  • Professional services 4.18 percent (-19 percent)
  • Retail and wholesale 3.97 percent (-18 percent)

Source: Watson Wyatt

Tags:
retirement

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Defined benefits for Federal Civil Servants were cut from 56% at 30 years service to 30% in 1984--if you want you can invest in a 401K on the side, so while benefits remain good, they don't make top ten past ten years--YOU stick it out in DoD trying to help kids come home alive with all the red tape and see how much fun that is.

You never make more than inflation related raises--If you made 10k in 1970 buying 3.4K cars, 40K houses, you need 100K today tobuy the "same" 34K car and identical $400K house--and that's exactly where you are.

It's a living, if you think it's so easy, grab a computer and try to qualify for a job you think is so cushy.

Good friggin luck.

Bletsu Fatsamatta of VA 8:19AM March 23, 2010

Quoting ...""The tumult of the last decade, with its market bubbles and crashes, two recessions, rising healthcare expenses, and compensation pressures, has caused employers to scramble to look for savings," says Jim Shaddy, North America retirement practice director at Watson Wyatt. "As a result, a number of employers have pushed some of the risk and cost in their retirement plans onto employees' shoulders.""

Private Sector TAXPAYERS continue to suffer ....... but Public Sector (Civil Servant) pensions & benefits continue to rise .

What's wrong with this picture ... why aren't they sharing in society's burdens, while we, the TAXPAYERS (who get so little) pay for the vast majority of their pensions & benefits ?

Its way past time for reductions in pensions & benefits for CURRENT, not just new civil Servants..

Bull of NY 8:58AM November 04, 2009

another aspect of finding the right job fit is to determine if the compensation being offered is a match for your skills. this can be difficult to ascertain initially, but a website called SalaryFor.com http://www.salaryfor.com/ helps make this easier by listing real salaries from an incredible number of companies and positions.

Karen of WA 4:20PM November 03, 2009

Planning to Retire

Senior editor Emily Brandon tells you how to get ready financially for retirement and to make your golden years the best they can be.

advertisement

Our retirement readiness calculator will provide a rough idea of how long your retirement savings and income will last.


advertisement