Why Employers Suspend 401(k) Matches

February 3, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)

Approximately 218 companies suspended their 401(k) match between January 2008 and November 2009, according to a new analysis by the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. Researchers Alicia Munnell and Laura Quinby estimate that 4.9 percent of all 401(k) participants were newly matchless at some time during this period. The majority of employers slimmed their match between December 2008 and May 2009, with the peak occurring in February 2009.

[See Will Your Employer Eliminate Its 401(k) Match?]

The companies that suspended their 401(k) contributions generally did so due to a lack of liquidity that rendered them unable to continue their previous contributions, suggests the study of 127 employers with newly suspended contributions and 1,734 non-suspenders. “Firms with more short term assets relative to liabilities are less likely to suspend their match,” the authors write. Large firms and companies in the manufacturing sector were also more likely to suspend their 401(k) match.

[See After a 401(k) Match is Cut, Do Workers Stop Saving For Retirement?]

The typical employer match is 50 cents for each dollar a worker saves up to 6 percent of the employee’s salary. When a match is eliminated, an employee effectively takes a 3 percent pay cut. For a worker earning $50,000 annually, that’s $1,500.

[See 401(k) Match Comes Out of Retirement.]

401(k) match suspensions during the 2001 recession were temporary and they may prove to be for this recession as well. Several large companies, accounting for 1.2 percent of 401(k) participants, have recently restored their employer contributions to retirement accounts. Check out Boston College’s table of companies that suspended their 401(k) match here.

Tags:
retirement

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

1. I think a ROTH IRA is generally better than the 401k IF (a) there is no company match, and (b) if your contribution is not going to be more than the $5,000 ($6,000 age 50+) a year anyway.

2. My former employer paid the "going rate" which was defined as just enough to keep their employees from going. Eliminating the company 401k match is usually just another way to squeeze the employees. I bet the generous supplemental pensions and benefits for the top execs were not curtailed.

Jake of OH 12:39AM February 24, 2010

As a Financial Advisor, I've found that when I meet others in public and the topic of 401(k)s come up, several people have commented that they don't participate any more because the company no longer matches. Thanks for sharing the exact numbers. Whenever I hear someone say something like this, I always try to explain that whether or not the employer matches any of your contribution, you still need to contribute because its YOUR retirement savings.

The pretax contributions also reduce your taxable income so that it should only cost about $75-$80 out of your check for a $100 in contributions.

Dean Voelker of IN 10:27AM February 06, 2010

Planning to Retire

Senior editor Emily Brandon tells you how to get ready financially for retirement and to make your golden years the best they can be.

advertisement

Our retirement readiness calculator will provide a rough idea of how long your retirement savings and income will last.


advertisement