How Target-Date Fund Fees Impact Retirement Income

April 6, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (1)

When you hold a fund over the long term, fees can add up significantly over your lifetime. Most target-date fund participants lose 30 percent or more of their potential retirement income to fees, according to a recent Towers Watson analysis of target-date funds. That works out to be between 5 and 15 years worth of retirement income that is deducted from 401(k) accounts over a worker’s lifetime. Passively managed and institutionally priced target-date funds generally had the lowest fees, while actively managed retail funds charged the most, the study found.

[See 7 Tips for Picking a Target-Date Fund.]

Consider a worker with a starting salary of $45,000 who saves 8 percent of his salary annually between ages 25 and 62. If he invests his savings in a target-date fund charging 1 percent annually he will lose 13.9 years worth of retirement income to fees, according to Towers Watson calculations. But if he chooses an ultra low cost target-date fund charging 0.2 percent in fees, he sacrifices just 3.2 years worth of retirement income to fees. A target-date fund with 0.5 percent annual fees would deplete his saving by 7.7 years worth of retirement income.

[See Target-Date Funds Have Hidden Risks.]

Target-date funds fees were found to have a bigger impact on a saver’s retirement income than the investment strategy of the target-date fund. Target-date funds differ in the percentage of the fund allocated to equities at various stages of a person’s lifetime, but most differences did not alter retirement income by more than two years, Towers Watson found. Target-date fund fees, however, eliminated between 7 and 12 years of worth of retirement income by charging between .5 percent and 1 percent fees annually over a participant’s career. In contrast, funds charging 0.2 percent in fees typically reduced retirement income by between 1 and 3 years. Workers who saved the highest percentage of their income for retirement often paid the most in fees.

Tags:
retirement

Reader Comments Read all comments (1)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

It's amazing that people are still cavalierly suggesting the mutual funds are the only option to build a nest egg. John C. Bogle, founder of the Vanguard Group has written scathing indictments about the industry he helped create. Here is one of several stunning reports: http://www.vanguard.com/bogle_site/sp20030708.htm If people are truly concerned about their retirement income meeting their needs, they must quit listening the the shysters in the financial services business. Isn't it ironic that they get paid even if the account values plummet? Two suggested readings: Richard Babbel's 2007 report on how to invest for retirement. Get it here: http://www.retiredsafely.com/index.php?p=1_23_Requesting-Babbel-Report

Also, Garrett Gunderson's book, Killing Sacred Cows will give you a realistic look at the entire set of myths perpetrated on the American public. You should read this book!

Randy McKee of SD 9:30AM April 07, 2010

Planning to Retire

Senior editor Emily Brandon tells you how to get ready financially for retirement and to make your golden years the best they can be.

advertisement

Our retirement readiness calculator will provide a rough idea of how long your retirement savings and income will last.


advertisement