3 Easy Ways to Meet Retirement Savings Goals

May 3, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)

It’s well known that most employees aren’t on track to maintain their current standard of living in retirement. The typical U.S. employee will need to accumulate 15 times his or her final pay using a combination of Social Security, pensions, retirement accounts, and other savings in order to retire comfortably, according to Hewitt Associates calculations released today. That number jumps to 15.7 times final pay when inflation and retiree medical costs are factored in.

[Use our Mutual Fund Score to find the best investments for you.]

Social Security alone is expected to provide 4.7 times final pay for most people over their lifetime, Hewitt calculated. Employees must come up with 11 times their salary on their own and using company-sponsored retirement plans. But most workers aren’t on track to save that much. Only 18 percent of employees who contribute to a 401(k) throughout their entire career are expected to accumulate 11 times their final salary before retirement, according to Hewitt’s analysis of over 2 million employees at 84 large companies. The typical worker in the study is on track to replace 13.3 times final pay (including Social Security), which would mean they will only have 85 percent of what would be needed to maintain their current lifestyle in retirement. Workers with only a 401(k) or similar type of retirement account are projected to meet just 74 percent of their financial needs in retirement, compared to 91 percent among employees who are or were enrolled in a traditional pension at some point during their career.

However, there are some fairly painless ways to make sure you are on track to meet your income needs in retirement. Here are three relatively easy ways to increase your chances of accumulating 11 times your final pay before retirement.

[See 7 401(k) Mistakes You’re Probably Making.]

Start young. Workers who start saving for retirement at a young age are the most likely to be on their way to meeting their retirement needs. For example, a 25-year-old employee who makes $30,000 annually could save enough for an adequate retirement income by saving 11 percent of pay each year throughout his career and earning a 5 percent annual 401(k) match, Hewitt found. If a worker waits until age 40 to participate in a 401(k) he needs to save an average of 17 percent of pay each year to achieve the same results.

Save 1 percent more. Workers who increase their contributions to a retirement account by 1 percent each year for 5 years are more likely to be able to maintain their lifestyle in retirement. Gradually escalating your retirement savings rate would put 70 percent of employees on track to coming reasonably close to producing an adequate retirement income, Hewitt found. “Small increases in saving levels can have a very positive impact on retirement income adequacy for employees of all ages,” says Rob Reiskytl, Hewitt’s leader of retirement plan strategy and design. “Many employers make it easy for their workers to accomplish this goal by offering tools like automatic contribution escalation, which enables employees to automatically increase their contribution rate each year without having to proactively take action.”

[ See 7 Retirement Risks You Need to Prepare For.]

Work 2 years longer. Delaying retirement packs the double punch of giving you more time to save and reducing the amount you must accumulate. Postponing retirement until age 67 drops the amount of savings you need from 15.7 times final pay to 14.4 times your last annual salary. “Workers who put off retirement for just two years have a much greater chance of retiring comfortably,” says Reiskytl. “Social Security benefits are increased, there’s more time to accumulate retirement savings, and assets will be withdrawn for a shorter period of time.” The typical employee at the large companies Hewitt studied is on track to replace 14.2 times final pay if current savings habits are maintained and they work until age 67. That means many people would be able to meet 98 percent of their future retirement needs simply by delaying retirement.

Tags:
retirement

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Perhaps preparing for retirement is not the same for current workers as it was for you, coberly. Social Security (for example) is much more generous to current retirees than it will be to future retirees. How it will change is yet to be seen; that it will change is certain. This a matter of demographics, not of the lack of foresight of current workers nor the shrewdness of today's retirees.

I am happy that you and many like you are "doing fine." However, I think you dismiss the author's advice a little too freely, apparently on the grounds that is doesn't apply to you. It isn't directed at you. The road to retirement security for the article's intended readership is much rockier than yours was. It involves choices you should be glad you didn't have to make. Not listening to any financial advisors is almost certainly bad advice. Doing nothing is not an option.

We certainly agree on one thing: regardless of the advisor, one should "at least be careful about listening to them." Well said.

some other guy of MD 5:29PM July 06, 2010

see, the way to save for retirement is to PUT OFF RETIRING. brilliant. send that man to the deficit commission.

and we have seen how reliable those 401k's are... of course if you can wait forty more years before retiring you can be sure you will come out ahead in the end.

and i know I certainly don't want to have to struggle through retirement on only 85% of my pay while working. after my house is bought and the children are grown and out of college. i mean, what is retirement without the Love Boat? or trips to Vegas.

better to start early and save 10% of my income while my income is barely minimum wage, i have two kids in diapers, a mortgage, and have yet to buy my first reliable car. god knows i'll have plenty of time to go skiing after i retire at age 67.

or I can just let the President and the Congress "fix" Social Security, use my Social Security money to pay off the national debt... and , hehe, raise the retirement age, or cut my benefits so i can't afford to retire anyway.

look folks. i did it. retired. i'm doing fine. but i didn't listen to any financial advisors. you ought to at least be careful about listening to them.

coberly of OR 4:26PM May 04, 2010

Planning to Retire

Senior editor Emily Brandon tells you how to get ready financially for retirement and to make your golden years the best they can be.

advertisement

Our retirement readiness calculator will provide a rough idea of how long your retirement savings and income will last.


advertisement